| Literature DB >> 30112192 |
Srdjan Saso1,1, Maria Tziraki2,2, Neil T Clancy2,2, Lipei Song2,2, Timothy Bracewell-Milnes3,3, Benjamin P Jones1,1, Maya Al-Memar1,1, Joseph Yazbek4,4, Meen-Yau Thum5,5, Ahmad Sayasneh6,6, Tom Bourne1,1, James Richard Smith1,1, Daniel S Elson2,2, Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami1,1.
Abstract
AIM: Uterine transplantation (UTx) is proposed for treatment of uterine factor infertility. Our aim was to assess whether Endoscopic Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis (eLASCA) could evaluate pelvic blood flow at anastomotic sites required for sheep and rabbit UTx. RESULTS/Entities:
Keywords: graft anastomosis; oxygen saturation; surgical imaging; tissue perfusion; uterine transplantation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30112192 PMCID: PMC6088268 DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Sci OA ISSN: 2056-5623
Measurement site for Endoscopic Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis performed on a sheep uterus.
This photograph was taken shortly after the abdomen was opened and the uterus was exteriorized.
Graph showing contrast portrayed as a function of frames (data acquired at 660 nm). The contrast and the spectrum of the contrast.
(A) Graph showing raw contrast as a function of time. (B) Graph showing contrast after detrending and interpolation. (C) Graph showing frequency spectrum of the interpolated contrast.
Graph showing contrast portrayed as a function of frames (data acquired at 660 nm).
Graph showing the variation of oxy-hemoglobin concentration with time.
Fibre bundle pattern applied and removed.
(A) Focused and imaged fiber bundle pattern in the donor. (B) Image of interest when the low pass Butterworth filter was applied. It removed the fiber bundle pattern thus ensuring that the contrast is mainly from the fiber pattern and not from the sample.
Image acquisition preretrieval.
(A) Intensity distribution of the various frequencies of speckle contrast at 660 nm.
(a) 0.13 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 7.8 breaths per min (b) 0.38 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 22.8 breaths per min or to any vibration of the system (c) 1.83 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 109 bpm (d) 2.13 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 127 bpm. (B) Intensity distribution of the various frequencies of the oxygenation map. (a) 0.23 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 13.8 breaths per min. (b) 0.38 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 22.8 breaths per min or to any vibration of the system. (c) 1.815 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 109 bpm (d) 2.08 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 123.6 bpm.
Image acquisition post-transplantation (UTx #2).
(A) Intensity distribution of the various frequencies of speckle contrast at 660 nm.
(a) 0.13 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 7.8 breaths per min (b) 0.50 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 22.8 breaths per min or to any vibration of the system (c) 1.15 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 69 bpm (d) 1.70 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 102 bpm (e) 1.82 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 109 bpm. (B) Intensity distribution of the various frequencies of speckle contrast of the oxygenation map. (a) 0.27 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 16.2 breaths per min (b) 0.51 Hz attributed to a breathing rate of 30.6 breaths per min or to any vibration of the system (c) 0.62 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 37.2 bpm (d) 1.72 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 103.2 bpm (e) 1.81 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 108.6 bpm (f) 2.22 Hz attributed to a cardiac rate of 133.2 bpm.
Preretrieval speckle contrast results (UTx #3).
Postretrieval speckle contrast results (UTx #3).
Preretrieval speckle contrast results (UTx #4).
Preretrieval speckle contrast results (UTx #5).
bpm: Beats per minute.
Postretrieval speckle contrast results (UTx #5).