| Literature DB >> 30111780 |
Stephani Kim1, Xijin Xu2, Yuling Zhang2, Xiangbin Zheng2, Rongju Liu2, Kim Dietrich1, Tiina Reponen1, Shuk-Mei Ho1, Changchun Xie1, Heidi Sucharew3, Xia Huo4, Aimin Chen5.
Abstract
Electronic waste (e-waste) is the fastest growing solid waste stream worldwide and mostly ends up in developing countries where residents use primitive methods for recycling. The most infamous e-waste recycling town, Guiyu in Southeast China, has been recycling since the mid-1990s. E-waste contains several harmful chemicals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and manganese (Mn). In 2011-12, the e-waste Recycling Exposures and Community Health (e-REACH) Study enrolled 634 pregnant women living in Guiyu and Haojiang, a control site, both in Shantou, China. The women completed a questionnaire and gave maternal blood, cord blood, and maternal urine, which were analyzed for Pb, Cd, Cr, and Mn. Maternal blood Pb, Cd, and Cr concentrations were significantly higher in Guiyu compared to Haojiang. In Guiyu, the geometric mean of Pb concentration in maternal blood was 6.66 µg/dL (range: 1.87-27.09 µg/dL) and was 1.74-fold greater than in Haojiang (95% CI: 1.60, 1.89). In cord blood, Pb concentration was 1.53-fold higher in Guiyu (95% CI: 1.38, 1.68). In maternal urine, Cd (ratio: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.72, 2.69) and Mn (ratio: 2.60, 95% CI: 2.04, 3.31) concentrations were significantly higher in Guiyu in comparison to Haojiang. In conclusion, pregnant women in Guiyu were at risk for increased exposure to heavy metals.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Chromium; Electronic waste; Lead; Manganese; Recycling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111780 PMCID: PMC6377357 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0054-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ISSN: 1559-0631 Impact factor: 5.563
Demographics of study participants in Guiyu (recycling site) and Haojiang (non-recycling site)a
| Characteristics | Guiyu n (%) | Haojiang n (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| n = 314 | n = 320 | |
| 26.5 ± 4.36 | 28.3 ± 4.34 | |
| Elementary school or less | 96 (30.6) | 61 (19.1) |
| Junior high school | 181 (57.6) | 158 (49.4) |
| High school | 17 (5.4) | 56 (17.5) |
| College or above | 4 (1.3) | 33 (10.3) |
| Farmer | 26 (8.3) | 47 (14.7) |
| Industrial Worker | 71 (22.6) | 55 (17.2) |
| Managerial/Professional | 29 (9.2) | 31 (9.7) |
| Unemployed | 118 (37.6) | 115 (35.9) |
| Other | 30 (9.6) | 42 (13.1) |
| Farmer | 15 (4.8) | 42 (13.1) |
| Industrial Worker | 82 (26.1) | 91 (28.4) |
| Managerial/Professional | 61 (19.4) | 83 (25.9) |
| Unemployed | 18 (5.7) | 25 (7.8) |
| Other | 71 (22.6) | 64 (20.0) |
| 0 pregnancies | 64 (20.4) | 143 (44.7) |
| 1 pregnancy | 105 (33.4) | 132 (41.3) |
| 2–3 pregnancies | 110 (35.0) | 43 (13.4) |
| >4 pregnancies | 32 (10.2) | 1 (0.3) |
| 8 (2.6) | 6 (1.9) | |
| 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.3) | |
| 166 (52.9) | 151 (47.2) | |
| 174 (55.4) | 168 (52.5) | |
| Less than once a week | 18 (5.7) | 40 (12.5) |
| 1–2 times a week | 87 (27.7) | 79 (24.7) |
| More than 2 times a week | 118 (37.6) | 142 (44.4) |
| 87 (27.7) | 0 (0) | |
| 39 (12.4) | 0 (0) | |
| 35 (11.2) | 0 (0) | |
| ≥ 1km | 49 (15.6) | 228 (71.3) |
| 200–999 m | 65 (20.7) | 0 (0) |
| < 200m | 66 (21.0) | 0 (0) |
| Never | 176 (56.1) | 289 (90.3) |
| Once a week | 30 (9.6) | 0 (0) |
| 2–6 times a week | 40 (12.7) | 0 (0) |
| Daily | 24 (7.6) | 0 (0) |
Total numbers may vary due to missing data
Concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cr, and Mn in maternal blood, cord blood, and maternal urine in Guiyu and Haojiang
| Metal | LOD | Guiyu n=314 | Haojiang n=320 | Guiyu vs. Haojiang Concentration Ratio | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
| n Missing | n<LOD | GM | Min | Max | CB:MB Ratio | n Missing | n<LOD | GM | Min | Max | CB:MB Ratio | Ratio | 95% CI | Ratio | 95% CI | ||
| 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 6.66 | 1.87 | 27.09 | 0 | 0 | 3.81 | 0.86 | 16.12 | 1.75 | 1.64, 1.86 | 1.74 | 1.60, 1.89 | |||
| 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 1.72 | 0.26 | 4.83 | 6 | 6 | 1.43 | 0.10 | 7.03 | 1.20 | 1.11, 1.29 | 1.21 | 1.09, 1.34 | |||
| 1.67 | 1 | 0 | 13.78 | 2.35 | 189.40 | 0 | 0 | 8.90 | 4.38 | 175.40 | 1.55 | 1.42, 1.69 | 1.55 | 1.37, 1.75 | |||
| 1.12 | 1 | 0 | 25.93 | 8.38 | 320.50 | 0 | 0 | 28.51 | 4.41 | 170.90 | 0.91 | 0.86, 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.77, 0.90 | |||
| 0.20 | 20 | 0 | 5.03 | 1.53 | 26.36 | 0.84 | 6 | 0 | 3.18 | 0.59 | 12.70 | 0.91 | 1.58 | 1.48, 1.70 | 1.53 | 1.38, 1.68 | |
| 0.20 | 21 | 171 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 1.96 | 0.13 | 16 | 124 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 2.25 | 0.18 | 0.80 | 0.75, 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.71, 0.87 | |
| 1.67 | 108 | 39 | 4.02 | 0.10 | 24.53 | 0.46 | 87 | 60 | 3.52 | 0.03 | 19.94 | 0.77 | 1.14 | 0.93, 1.41 | 1.32 | 0.98, 1.78 | |
| 1.12 | 28 | 0 | 52.93 | 20.66 | 165.90 | 2.27 | 29 | 0 | 49.69 | 16.60 | 131.20 | 2.00 | 1.07 | 1.01, 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.03, 1.21 | |
| 0.04 | 68 | 2 | 1.06 | 0.05 | 18.71 | 75 | 6 | 0.54 | 0.03 | 16.47 | 1.94 | 1.65, 2.29 | 2.15 | 1.72, 2.69 | |||
| 0.08 | 107 | 8 | 1.66 | 0.01 | 114.67 | 103 | 18 | 0.97 | 0.01 | 35.12 | 1.72 | 1.29, 2.29 | 1.63 | 1.09, 2.45 | |||
| 0.06 | 82 | 0 | 7.62 | 0.84 | 158.26 | 54 | 0 | 3.14 | 0.13 | 40.47 | 2.43 | 2.05, 2.88 | 2.60 | 2.04, 3.31 | |||
We used the machine reading values of those below LOD
Adjusted for maternal age, maternal BMI, maternal education, maternal occupation, gravidity, ETS
The unit of limit of detection in maternal urine was 1g/L LOD: limit of detection; CB: Cord blood; MB: Maternal blood
p<0.05
Unadjusted and adjusted relative risk for elevated blood lead (≥ 5 μg/dL and ≥10 μg/dL) and cadmium levels (≥1.7 μg/L)b
| Variable | Guiyu n (%) | Haojiang n (%) | Unadjusted RR [RR (95% CI)] | Adjusted RR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 232 (73.9) | 64 (20.0) | 3.70 (2.94, 4.64) | 4.03 (3.07, 5.29) | |
| 50 (15.9) | 5 (1.6) | 10.19 (4.12, 25.22) | 8.75 (2.85, 26.86) | |
| 160 (50.9) | 117 (36.6) | 1.39 (1.16, 1.67) | 1.49 (1.16, 1.91) |
Adjusted for maternal age, maternal BMI, gravidity, ETS
Cadmium levels from the CDC Fourth Report 95th percentile of adults in the United States
p<0.01
Exposure differences in the parents involved in e-waste recycling compared to those who are not
| LOD | Guiyu Parents Involved with Informal E-waste Recycling | Guiyu Parents Not Involved with Informal E-waste Recycling | Involved vs. Not Involved Metal Ratio | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 87 | n = 227 | Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||||||||
| n Missing | GM | Min | Max | n Missing | GM | Min | Max | [Ratio (95% CI)] | [Ratio (95% CI)] | ||
| 0.20 | 0 | 6.99 | 3.08 | 27.09 | 0 | 6.54 | 1.87 | 25.97 | 1.07 (0.96, 1.19) | 1.14 (1.01, 1.30) | |
| 0.20 | 0 | 1.65 | 0.26 | 4.52 | 0 | 1.74 | 0.27 | 4.83 | 0.95 (0.85, 1.05) | 0.87 (0.77, 1.00) | |
| 1.67 | 0 | 14.30 | 5.07 | 189.40 | 1 | 13.59 | 2.35 | 140.70 | 1.05 (0.90, 1.23) | 0.99 (0.80, 1.22) | |
| 1.12 | 0 | 26.88 | 8.38 | 320.50 | 1 | 25.58 | 11.19 | 50.42 | 1.05 (0.97, 1.14) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.13) | |
| 0.20 | 9 | 5.84 | 2.35 | 16.99 | 11 | 4.77 | 1.53 | 26.36 | 1.22 (1.08, 1.38) | 1.29 (1.11, 1.51) | |
| 0.20 | 9 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.76 | 12 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 1.96 | 0.96 (0.86, 1.07) | 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) | |
| 1.67 | 35 | 3.64 | 0.10 | 18.42 | 73 | 4.16 | 0.32 | 24.53 | 0.88 (0.66, 1.16) | 0.87 (0.60, 1.27) | |
| 1.12 | 10 | 51.04 | 25.33 | 101.70 | 18 | 53.64 | 20.66 | 165.90 | 0.95 (0.88, 1.03) | 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) | |
| 0.04 | 15 | 1.05 | 0.05 | 18.71 | 53 | 1.06 | 0.08 | 16.47 | 0.99 (0.77, 1.28) | 1.25 (0.91, 1.72) | |
| 0.08 | 31 | 1.73 | 0.01 | 96.75 | 76 | 1.64 | 0.01 | 114.67 | 1.05 (0.66, 1.68) | 0.94 (0.50, 1.77) | |
| 0.06 | 21 | 7.21 | 1.03 | 72.77 | 61 | 7.79 | 0.84 | 158.26 | 0.93 (0.70, 1.22) | 0.80 (0.54, 1.17) | |
We used the machine reading values of those below LOD
Adjusted for maternal age, maternal BMI, maternal education, maternal occupation, gravidity, and ETS
p<0.05