Obesity is associated with the chronic inflammation and senescence of adipose tissues. Macrophage is a key mediator of chronic inflammation that infiltrates obese adipose tissue and stimulates metabolic disorders. However, the fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration and senescence, especially the influence on intramuscular adipose tissue, have remained unclear. We investigated the fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration and senescence in obese bovine adipose tissue from three different anatomical sites (subcutaneous, intramuscular and visceral). Macrophage infiltrations and crown-like structures were observed in visceral adipose tissue, although there were few macrophages in subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues. The positive reaction of senescence marker SA-βgal activity was observed in visceral adipose tissue. In contrast, the activity of SA-βgal in subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues were low. The expression of p53 gene, the master regulator of cellular senescence, in visceral adipose tissue was higher than that of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissue. At the cellular level, p53 gene expression was negatively correlated with the size of subcutaneous adipocytes. In contrast, p53 gene expressions were positively correlated with the size of intramuscular and visceral adipocytes. These results indicate that anatomical sites of obese adipose tissue affect macrophage infiltration and the senescent state in a fat depot-specific manner.
Obesity is associated with the chronic inflammation and senescence of adipose tissues. Macrophage is a key mediator of chronic inflammation that infiltrates obeseadipose tissue and stimulates metabolic disorders. However, the fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration and senescence, especially the influence on intramuscular adipose tissue, have remained unclear. We investigated the fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration and senescence in obesebovineadipose tissue from three different anatomical sites (subcutaneous, intramuscular and visceral). Macrophage infiltrations and crown-like structures were observed in visceral adipose tissue, although there were few macrophages in subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues. The positive reaction of senescence marker SA-βgal activity was observed in visceral adipose tissue. In contrast, the activity of SA-βgal in subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues were low. The expression of p53 gene, the master regulator of cellular senescence, in visceral adipose tissue was higher than that of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissue. At the cellular level, p53 gene expression was negatively correlated with the size of subcutaneous adipocytes. In contrast, p53 gene expressions were positively correlated with the size of intramuscular and visceral adipocytes. These results indicate that anatomical sites of obeseadipose tissue affect macrophage infiltration and the senescent state in a fat depot-specific manner.
Obesity is associated with the chronic inflammation of adipose tissue. Adipose tissue
inflammation influences the risk of metabolic syndrome in a fat depot-specific manner. Excess
visceral adipose tissue accumulation is closely related to the risk of metabolic disorders
[10]. In contrast, subcutaneous adipose tissue has
been shown to exhibit less inflammation than visceral adipose tissue, even in obese conditions
[6, 11].
Macrophage is a key mediator of inflammation, which infiltrates into adipose tissue and
stimulates metabolic disorders via increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines [1, 50]. Macrophage
infiltration is more abundant in visceral adipose tissue than in subcutaneous adipose tissue
of obesemice [2, 31]. These results indicate the crucial role of macrophage in the regulation of
obesity-induced metabolic disorders through visceral adipose tissue inflammation.Obesity is also strongly associated with the senescence of adipose tissue. Tumor suppressor
p53 (p53) is a transcription factor that acts by inducing cellular senescence and promoting
cell death [26]. The expression of p53 in adipose
tissue was significantly higher in obesemice than in controls [53]. The upregulation of p53 in obesemouseadipose tissue increased
macrophage infiltration and elevated the activity of senescence-associated β-galactosidase
(SA-βgal), a marker of cellular senescence [28]. In
contrast, the inhibition of p53 in obesemouseadipose tissue markedly decreased macrophage
infiltration and suppressed the SA-βgal activity [28].
These results indicate the importance of p53 as a key regulator of obesity-induced adipose
tissue inflammation and senescence. However, the fat depot-specific differences of p53
expression have remained unclear.Hypoxia is also a potent inducer of adipose tissue inflammation. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α
(HIF-1α) is a transcription factor that regulates oxygen homeostasis and physiological
responses to oxygen deprivation [3]. The
adipocyte-specific overexpression of HIF-1α in obesemice increases adipose tissue
inflammation [14]. In addition, adipocyte-specific
HIF-1α knockout in obesemice reduces adipose tissue inflammation [23]. These results indicate that HIF-1α plays a key role in adipose tissue
inflammation. However, few studies have examined the relationship between HIF-1α expression
and adipose tissue depots.Recently, ectopic fat deposition, especially intramuscular adipose tissue accumulation within
the skeletal muscle, has been recognized as a new risk factor of metabolic syndrome [5, 45]. However, the
macrophage infiltration and senescence in intramuscular adipose tissue, in both humans and
rodents, has not yet been investigated. In beef cattle, the amount of intramuscular adipose
tissue is especially important for determining the quality grade of beef. In particular,
Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) are characterized by the ability to accumulate
high amounts of intramuscular adipose tissue [30].
Intramuscular fat percentages of longissimus muscles of fattening Wagyu
cattle are typically higher than 30% [30], which is
about ten times higher than the established animal model of intramuscular fat accumulation in
Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty (OLETF) rat [49,
52]. Therefore, for elucidating the mechanism of
intramuscular adipocyte metabolism, Wagyu is thought to be the optimal animal
model rather than rodents.In the present study, we investigated fat depot-specific differences of macrophage
infiltration and senescence in obese Wagyu cattle from three different
anatomical sites (subcutaneous, intramuscular, and visceral).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Fattening Wagyu steers (n=15) were used in this study. The
characteristics of animals are shown in Table
1. Subcutaneous adipose tissue and the intramuscular adipose tissue within the
longissimus muscle were collected between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae at
slaughter. Visceral adipose tissue was also sampled from the area surrounding the colon.
Adipose tissue samples for determining mRNA expression were collected immediately after
slaughter in RNAlater reagent (Ambion, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) and stored at −80°C for
later RNA extraction. Thin slices of adipose tissue samples were also collected
immediately after slaughter to determine the immunohistochemistry, adipocyte size, and
senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βgal) staining, as described below. After
slaughter, the carcass was physically separated into muscle, bone, and fat to measure the
subcutaneous and visceral fat tissue weight. The intramuscular fat content of the
longissimus muscle was obtained via Soxhlet extraction method. All animals received humane
care as outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (Institute of
Livestock and Grassland Science).
Table 1.
Characteristics of animals
Age(month)
Body weight(kg)
Subcutaneous fat weight(kg)
Visceral fat weight(kg)
Intramuscular fat content(%)
Means ± SE
30 ± 0.3
714 ± 18.5
55 ± 3.3
51 ± 2.4
34 ± 2.1
Range
27–32
633–871
37–79
35–73
21–54
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
mRNA expression was analyzed by real-time PCR as described previously [54,55,56]. In brief, total RNA was extracted from adipose
tissue using a RiboPure Kit (Ambion) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
First-strand cDNA was reverse-transcribed from 0.5 µg of total RNA using
the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo Co., Osaka, Japan) in accordance with the
manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed with a MiniOpticon system (Bio-Rad,
Munich, Germany) using THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo) in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences were as follows: CD68, 5′- CAG AAG GCA
GAG GGT ACA GG-3′ (forward) and 5′- ACA CAG CCA ACC TCA TGA CA-3′ (reverse); CD163, 5′-
CTG TAA TCT GCT CAG GAA ATC G-3′ (forward) and 5′- GCA AGG AAC ACC ATT CTC TTC-3′
(reverse); TNFα, 5′- CCC ATC TAC CAG GGA GGA GT-3′ (forward) and 5′- GGC GAT GAT CCC AAA
GTA GA-3′ (reverse); VEGF, 5′- GAA CTT TCT GCT CTC TTG GG-3′ (forward) and 5′- CTG GCT TTG
GTG AGG TTT GA-3′ (reverse); mmp9, 5′- CCA TTA GCA CGC ACG ACA TC-3′ (forward) and 5′- TTC
ACC TCA TTC TGG GAA CTC AC-3′ (reverse); p53, 5′- CTG AGT GCA CCA CCA TCC ACT A-3′
(forward) and 5′- TGT TCC GTC CCA GCA GGT TA-3′ (reverse); HIF-1α, 5′- GCA ACC AGA TGA TCG
TGC AA-3′ (forward) and 5′- AAT CAT AAC TGG TCA GCT GTG GTA G-3′ (reverse); ribosomal
protein large P0 (RPLP0), 5′-CAA CCC TGA AGT GCT TGA CAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGG CAG ATG
GAT CAG CCA-3′ (reverse). Reaction conditions were designed as follows: initial
denaturation at 95°C for 60 sec, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 15
sec, and 70°C for 30 sec. Expression levels of mRNA were normalized to RPLP0 as an
internal control.
SA-βgal staining
SA-βgal activity was examined using the Senescence Detection Kit (BioVision Co.,
Milpitas, CA, U.S.A.). In brief, adipose tissue samples were incubated within X-gal
staining solution overnight at 37°C in the dark, followed by washing two times with
ice-cold PBS to stop the enzymatic reaction. Stained adipose tissues were photographed
using a digital camera (DMC-TZ85, Panasonic, Tokyo, Japan). SA-βgal-positive adipocytes
within adipose tissues form a blue precipitate area [28].
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemistry, frozen sections (10–12 µm) were cut from
adipose tissues with a cryostat (CM1850, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Macrophages were
identified using the VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit (Vector, Burlingame, CA, U.S.A.) in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, sections were incubated
overnight (4°C) with primary monoclonal anti-CD68 (1:300, clone EBM11, Dako, Glostrup,
Denmark), and secondary antibodies were labeled with peroxidase (1:1,000, PK-6102, Vector)
for 2 hr at room temperature. The immunoreaction was visualized using the ImmPACT DAB
Substrate Kit (Vector) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Stained sections
were photographed using an IX71 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a DP70
digital camera (Olympus).
Adipocyte size
Adipocyte size was measured as described previously [39]. In brief, adipose tissue samples were fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide at
room temperature. Then, fixed adipose tissue samples were incubated within 8 M of urea
solution. Stained adipocytes were photographed using a microscope system (Olympus) as
described above. The adipocyte diameter was measured using WinROOF software (Mitani Corp.,
Fukui, Japan). More than 300 adipocytes for each sample were measured.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as means ± S.D. Statistical significance was determined by analysis
of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The linear
regression method was used to analyze correlations. Values of P<0.05
were considered significant, and 0.05≤ P<0.1 was considered a trend
toward significance.
RESULTS
Fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltrations
Fat depot-specific differences in macrophage infiltration were measured in the three
types of adipose tissues (subcutaneous, intramuscular, and visceral). CD68 and CD163 gene
expressions were quantified as a marker of macrophage. Visceral adipose tissue expressed
significantly higher CD68 (P<0.05, Fig. 1A) and CD163 (P<0.05, Fig.
1B) mRNA than did subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues. There was no
significant difference in the expression of TNFα mRNA among adipose tissue depots (Fig. 1C). Then, we observed the macrophage
infiltrations among subcutaneous, intramuscular, and visceral adipose tissues. There are
few macrophages in subcutaneous (Fig. 1E) and
intramuscular (Fig. 1F) adipose tissues.
Macrophage infiltration was observed mainly in visceral adipose tissue (Fig. 1G). Crown-like structures (CLS), which consist
of macrophages surrounding dead adipocytes [2, 7, 31], were also
found only in visceral adipose tissue (Fig. 1H,
1I).
Fig. 1.
Fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration in obese bovine adipose
tissues. Expression of the macrophage marker gene ((A) CD68 and (B) CD163), and (C)
TNFα gene in subcutaneous (S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissue
(n=15). The middle line in the box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars
indicate the range of data. a, b: Values with different superscripts were
significantly different (P<0.05). Representative
light-microscopic images of (D) bovine spleen (positive control), (E) subcutaneous
adipose tissue, (F) intramuscular adipose tissue, and (G, H, I) visceral adipose
tissue. (G) CD68 immunoreactive macrophages and (H, I) crown-like structures (CLS)
within visceral adipose tissue are indicated by white arrowheads (magnification: (D,
E, F, G) × 40, (H, I) × 100).
Fat depot-specific differences of macrophage infiltration in obesebovineadipose
tissues. Expression of the macrophage marker gene ((A) CD68 and (B) CD163), and (C)
TNFα gene in subcutaneous (S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissue
(n=15). The middle line in the box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars
indicate the range of data. a, b: Values with different superscripts were
significantly different (P<0.05). Representative
light-microscopic images of (D) bovine spleen (positive control), (E) subcutaneous
adipose tissue, (F) intramuscular adipose tissue, and (G, H, I) visceral adipose
tissue. (G) CD68 immunoreactive macrophages and (H, I) crown-like structures (CLS)
within visceral adipose tissue are indicated by white arrowheads (magnification: (D,
E, F, G) × 40, (H, I) × 100).
Fat depot-specific differences of adipose tissue senescence
Figure 2 shows fat depot-specific differences of adipose tissue senescence. The positive
reaction of senescence marker SA-βgal activity (blue color) was observed in visceral
adipose tissue (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the
activity of SA-βgal in subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues were low (Fig. 2A). Visceral adipose tissue also expressed
significantly higher senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) marker genes VEGF
(P<0.05, Fig. 2B), and
mmp9 (P<0.05, Fig. 2C) than
did subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues.
Fig. 2.
Fat depot-specific differences of adipocyte senescence in obese bovine adipose
tissues. (A) SA-βgal staining of subcutaneous (Sub), intramuscular (Int), and
visceral (Vis) adipose tissue. SA-βgal activity (blue color) was observed in
visceral adipose tissue. In contrast, the activity of SA-βgal in subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipose tissues were low. Expression of the senescence-associated
secretory phenotype (SASP) marker gene ((B) VEGF, and (C) mmp9) gene in subcutaneous
(S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissue. The middle line in the
box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars indicate the range of data. a,
b: Values with different superscripts were significantly different
(P<0.05).
Fat depot-specific differences of adipocyte senescence in obesebovineadipose
tissues. (A) SA-βgal staining of subcutaneous (Sub), intramuscular (Int), and
visceral (Vis) adipose tissue. SA-βgal activity (blue color) was observed in
visceral adipose tissue. In contrast, the activity of SA-βgal in subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipose tissues were low. Expression of the senescence-associated
secretory phenotype (SASP) marker gene ((B) VEGF, and (C) mmp9) gene in subcutaneous
(S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissue. The middle line in the
box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars indicate the range of data. a,
b: Values with different superscripts were significantly different
(P<0.05).Figure 3 shows osmium tetroxide-fixed adipocytes from (S) subcutaneous, (I) intramuscular,
and (V) visceral adipose tissues. Compared to visceral adipocytes, the subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipocyte size distribution shifted toward smaller diameters (Fig. 3A). The mean adipocyte size increased
significantly (P<0.05, Fig.
3B) in the following order: intramuscular (133.0 ± 9.2 µm),
subcutaneous (144.6 ± 9.1 µm), and visceral (183.7 ± 12.8
µm) adipocytes (Fig.
3C–E).
Fig. 3.
Fat depot-specific differences of adipocyte cellularity in obese bovine adipose
tissues. (A) Distributions of sizes of adipocyte diameter in subcutaneous (S),
intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues (n=15). (B) Mean adipocyte
diameter of subcutaneous (S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues.
The middle line in the box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars
indicate the range of data. a, b, c: Values with different superscripts were
significantly different (P<0.05). Osmium tetroxide-fixed
adipocytes from (C) subcutaneous, (D) intramuscular, and (E) visceral adipose
tissues (magnification: × 40). White scale bar indicates 300
µm.
Fat depot-specific differences of adipocyte cellularity in obesebovineadipose
tissues. (A) Distributions of sizes of adipocyte diameter in subcutaneous (S),
intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues (n=15). (B) Mean adipocyte
diameter of subcutaneous (S), intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues.
The middle line in the box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars
indicate the range of data. a, b, c: Values with different superscripts were
significantly different (P<0.05). Osmium tetroxide-fixed
adipocytes from (C) subcutaneous, (D) intramuscular, and (E) visceral adipose
tissues (magnification: × 40). White scale bar indicates 300
µm.Figure 4 shows the p53 and HIF-1α gene expressions among three types of adipose tissues.
Visceral adipose tissue expressed higher p53 mRNA than did subcutaneous and intramuscular
adipose tissues (Fig. 4A). Morphological
analysis of adipocytes showed that the p53 mRNA expression level was negatively correlated
with the subcutaneous adipocyte size (r=−0.69, P<0.01, Fig. 4B). However, the p53 mRNA expression level was
positively correlated with the intramuscular (r=0.81, P<0.01, Fig. 4C) and visceral (r=0.52,
P<0.01, Fig. 4D) adipocyte
sizes. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the expression of HIF-1α mRNA
among adipose tissue depots (Fig. 4E). HIF-1α
mRNA expression level was positively correlated with the subcutaneous adipocyte size
(r=0.51, P<0.05, Fig. 4F),
and negatively correlated with intramuscular (r=−0.51, P<0.05, Fig. 4G) and visceral (r=−0.46,
P=0.08, Fig. 4H) adipocyte
size.
Fig. 4.
Fat depot-specific differences of p53 and HIF-1α mRNA expression in obese bovine
adipose tissues. Expression of (A) p53 and (E) HIF-1α genes in subcutaneous (S),
intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues (n=15). The middle line in the
box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars indicate the range of data. a,
b: Values with different superscripts were significantly different
(P<0.05). Relationship between p53 gene expression and (B)
subcutaneous, (C) intramuscular, and (D) visceral adipocyte size. Relationship
between HIF-1α gene expression and (F) subcutaneous, (G) intramuscular, and (H)
visceral adipocyte size. (○) subcutaneous adipocyte; (▲) intramuscular adipocyte;
(●) visceral adipocyte.
Fat depot-specific differences of p53 and HIF-1α mRNA expression in obesebovineadipose tissues. Expression of (A) p53 and (E) HIF-1α genes in subcutaneous (S),
intramuscular (I), and visceral (V) adipose tissues (n=15). The middle line in the
box-plot represents the median, and the vertical bars indicate the range of data. a,
b: Values with different superscripts were significantly different
(P<0.05). Relationship between p53 gene expression and (B)
subcutaneous, (C) intramuscular, and (D) visceral adipocyte size. Relationship
between HIF-1α gene expression and (F) subcutaneous, (G) intramuscular, and (H)
visceral adipocyte size. (○) subcutaneous adipocyte; (▲) intramuscular adipocyte;
(●) visceral adipocyte.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we showed that the macrophage infiltration into visceral adipose
tissue was higher than that of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues. We also
showed that there was no significant difference in the expression of TNFα gene among adipose
tissue depots as previously reported in ratadipose tissues [32]. As for the macrophage infiltration into adipose tissues, previous reports
also showed that macrophage infiltration was significantly higher in visceral adipose tissue
than in subcutaneous adipose tissue in obesemice [2,
31] and humans [15, 25]. These results indicate that
visceral adipose tissue is the most active adipose tissue depot as related to macrophage
infiltration both in obese monogastric animals and obese ruminants. Our data for higher
macrophage infiltration and CLS formation also suggest increasing adipocyte death within
visceral adipose tissue. Alkhouri et al. reported that macrophage
infiltration and adipocyte death were increased in the adipose tissue of obesemice [1]. Cinti et al. showed that the
frequency of adipocyte death is positively correlated with increased adipocyte size in obesemice and humans [7]. We also showed that visceral
adipocyte size was significantly larger than subcutaneous and intramuscular depots.
Hypertrophic adipocytes ensured an insufficient oxygen supply and were affected by hypoxic
stress [16, 17]. In addition, visceral adipose tissue is exposed to more stressors, such as
oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS), than are subcutaneous locations [12, 24, 43]. These stressors stimulate adipocyte death via the
accumulation of DNA damage [46]. Our previous study
also showed that oxidative stress was strongly associated with visceral adiposity rather
than subcutaneous adiposity in obese cattle [55].
These results suggest that increasing macrophage infiltration into visceral adipose tissue
is affected by larger adipocyte size and more stressors than in subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipose tissues.We found that, by increased activity of SA-βgal, visceral adipose tissue exhibited an
accelerated senescent phenotype as compared to subcutaneous and intramuscular tissues. To
our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate fat depot-specific differences of
SA-βgal activity, especially the senescent phenotype of ectopic (intramuscular) adipose
tissue. Cellular senescence is categorized into two distinct types. “Replicative senescence”
is associated with the cellular aging process affected by telomere shortening [35, 41]. In
contrast, “premature senescence” is induced by stressors such as oxidative stress and ROS
without telomere-independent mechanisms [51, 57]. Our previous study indicated that telomere length
was not associated with adipocyte hypertrophy from three anatomical sites (subcutaneous,
visceral and intramuscular) in obese cattle [56].
These results suggest that obese visceraladipose tissue is in a state of premature
senescence. Premature senescence leads to a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)
characterized by the increased production of cytokines and matrix metalloproteinase (mmp)
[40, 42,
50]. In the present study, we showed that visceral
adipose tissue expressed significantly higher SASP marker genes than did subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipose tissues. Our previous study also indicated that obesebovine visceral
adipocytes expressed higher levels of adipokine genes than did subcutaneous and
intramuscular adipocytes [54]. These results also
suggest that obese visceraladipose tissue is in a state of SASP.We showed that visceral adipose tissue expressed highest levels of p53 among the three
adipose tissue depots. The p53 signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of cellular
senescence [26], and the upregulation of p53 in the
adipose tissue of obesemice stimulates senescence-associated inflammation [28]. Shimizu et al. also showed that
obese conditions cause ROS-induced upregulation of p53 in adipose tissue [47]. In addition, Schafer et al. showed
that excessive nutrient intake upregulated the activity of SA-βgal, with increased
expression of p53 in the adipose tissue of obesemice [42]. These results indicate that fat depot-specific differences of adipose tissue
premature senescence and inflammation are regulated by p53. In contrast, no significant
differences in the HIF-1α expression level were observed among adipose tissue depots.
Poulain-Godefroy et al. also reported that there was no difference in the
HIF-1α expression levels of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues in humans [36]. These results suggest that the HIF-1α expression
level in adipose tissue might not be affected by anatomical locations.At the cellular level, the present results showed that the adipocyte sizes of subcutaneous
and intermuscular/visceral depots were oppositely affected by p53 and HIF-1α expression
levels. In subcutaneous depots, hypertrophic adipocyte had lower p53 and higher HIF-1α gene
expression. In contrast to subcutaneous adipocytes, hypertrophic adipocytes in intermuscular
and visceral depots had higher p53 and lower HIF-1α gene expression. Ravi et
al. reported that p53 inhibited the expression of HIF-1α [37]. Mizuno et al. also showed that p53 knockout mice
displayed higher HIF-1α expression levels than did wild-type mice [29]. These results suggest that the HIF-1α levels in adipocytes are
negatively affected by p53 expression. Sermeus et al. indicated that under
mild hypoxic conditions, a high intracellular level of HIF-1α is maintained with a low p53
level, which stimulates the expression of target genes involved in cellular survival and
protects against cell death [44]. In contrast, anoxic
conditions induce high p53 and low HIF-1α levels, which leads to cell death [44]. These results suggest that, at the cellular level,
hypertrophic adipocytes might be exposed to more severe hypoxic conditions in visceral and
intramuscular depots than in subcutaneous locations.Daviau et al. indicated that p53 expression was significantly up-regulated
in Preadipocyte factor-1 (pref-1) knockdown WI-38 cells [8]. Pref-1 is a transmembrane protein acts as a molecular gatekeeper of
adipogenesis [48]. Our previous reports showed that
pref-1 gene expression level was fat-depot specific, and pref-1 expression level was
positively correlated with the subcutaneous adipocyte size, and negatively correlated with
the intramuscular and visceral adipocyte size [56].
These results suggest that p53 expression might be regulated negatively by the pref-1
pathway. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of pref-1 on the p53 expression
during adipogenesis.In fattening Wagyu cattle, obesity-associated adipose tissue disorders,
called “fatnecrosis” and “muscle inflammation”, occasionally develop during fattening
periods [18, 34]. The histological analysis of bovinefatnecrosis shows an increasing fibrous
area within visceral adipose tissue [20]. Obese
conditions accelerate the fibrosis of adipose tissue as a cause of severe inflammation both
in humans [9, 38] and rodents [21, 22]. These results suggest that “fatnecrosis” of bovine visceral adipose
tissue might be affected by the severe inflammatory condition induced by obesity. “Muscle
inflammation” is generally observed at the musculus trapezius and longissimus dorsi of
fattening Wagyu cattle; these musculatures contain the largest amount of
intramuscular adipose tissue among bovine muscles [18, 19]. The histological analysis of bovine
“muscle inflammation” is characterized by muscular steatosis [4, 33]. A murine model of nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease studies indicated that the expression of p53 was increased in hepatic
steatosis [13, 53]. In addition, Liu et al. reported that subcutaneous adipose
tissue was more resistant than visceral adipose tissue to cell death caused by oxidative
stress [27]. These results also suggest that not only
visceral adipocytes, but also intramuscular adipocytes might be potentially more sensitive
than subcutaneous adipocytes for stress conditions induced by obesity.In conclusion, we show that the macrophage infiltration into visceral adipose tissue is
higher than that of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues. The present results also
show that the fat depot-specific differences of adipose tissue premature senescence are
affected by p53 expression. These results indicate that anatomical sites of obeseadipose
tissue affect macrophage infiltration and the senescent state in a fat depot-specific
manner.
Authors: Saverio Cinti; Grant Mitchell; Giorgio Barbatelli; Incoronata Murano; Enzo Ceresi; Emanuela Faloia; Shupei Wang; Melanie Fortier; Andrew S Greenberg; Martin S Obin Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2005-09-08 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Naim Alkhouri; Agnieszka Gornicka; Michael P Berk; Samjhana Thapaliya; Laura J Dixon; Sangeeta Kashyap; Philip R Schauer; Ariel E Feldstein Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Marissa J Schafer; Thomas A White; Glenda Evans; Jason M Tonne; Grace C Verzosa; Michael B Stout; Daniel L Mazula; Allyson K Palmer; Darren J Baker; Michael D Jensen; Michael S Torbenson; Jordan D Miller; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Tamara Tchkonia; Jan M van Deursen; James L Kirkland; Nathan K LeBrasseur Journal: Diabetes Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Akilavalli Narasimhan; Rafael R Flores; Christina D Camell; David A Bernlohr; Paul D Robbins; Laura J Niedernhofer Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2022-10-14 Impact factor: 5.430