| Literature DB >> 30111342 |
Michael Caspers1,2, Nadine Schäfer3, Matthias Fröhlich4, Ursula Bauerfeind5, Bertil Bouillon4, Manuel Mutschler4, Marc Maegele3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: External factors following trauma and iatrogenic intervention influence blood coagulation and particularly clot formation. In particular, three external factors (in detail dilution via uncritical volume replacement, acidosis and hypothermia), in combination, referred to as the "lethal triad", substantially aggravate the hypocoagulative state after trauma. Contribution of these external factors to the resulting hypocoagulative state in trauma and especially their influence on primary haemostasis has still not been investigated systematically. This study aims to assess this contribution to the aggravating hypocoagulative state in trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) using an in vitro simulation assay. Emphasis is given to platelet contribution to clot formation and to the investigation of how platelet activation alters under the respective conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Acidosis in trauma; Dilution in trauma; Hypothermia in trauma; Lethal triad; PlateletMapping®; ROTEM®
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111342 PMCID: PMC6094881 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-018-0536-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ISSN: 1757-7241 Impact factor: 2.953
Standard blood count and cougulation testing for the respective lethal triad conditions
| Blood count | Standard coagulation tests | BGA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haemoglobin level [g/dl] | Platelets [10^3/μl] | Haematocrit [%] | aPTT [s] | TT [s] | INR | Fibrinogen [mg/dl] | pH | |
| Baseline | 11.4 (0.3) | 257 (103) | 32.7 (2.5) | 30.3 (0.3) | 16 (0.3) | 1.18 (0.1) | 250 (59) | 7.35 (0.02) |
| pH 6.8 | 12.6 (1.4) | 211 (70) | 35.4 (3.1) | 27.5 (0.3) | 17.5 (0.3) | 1.14 (0.09) | 268 (39) | 6.83 (0.05) |
| Temp. 33 °C | 11.4 (1) | 247 (98) | 33.1 (2.3) | 32.1 (0.1) | 15.7 (0.1) | 1.16 (0.13) | 243 (62) | 7.38 (0.00) |
| Dilution | 7.5 (0.9) | 167 (44) | 22.2 (2.3) | 43.3 (0.6) | 20.8 (0.6) | 1.41 (0.07) | 166 (39) | 7.37 (0.02) |
| Lethal Triad | 7.7 (0.8) | 125 (59) | 22.8 (2) | 34.9 (0.8) | 23.8 (0.8) | 1.46 (0.11) | 154 (27) | 6.83 (0.02) |
Left column: Results from standard blood count for the respective conditions, including haemoglobin level [g/dl], platelet count [/μl] and haematocrit [%]. Right column: Results from standard coagulation testing, including Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) [s], Thrombin Time [s], Quick [%], INR [dimensionless] and fibrinogen level measured via Clauss method [mg/dl]. Right column: pH values measured at respective time points
All results are given as median values. The Interquartile Range (IQR) is given in brackets
Fig. 1Clot kinetics and clot formation in ROTEM®. Functional coagulation testing using ROTEM® analysis is presented as relative changes referring to the respective baseline coagulation. Baseline coagulation is set as 100%, respectively. Results are marked as statistically significant if their error probability was less than 5% (p < 0.05; *). a: Clot kinetics in EXTEM, specified by CFT and α-angle. b: Clot formation in EXTEM, specified by MCF and clot diameter after 5 min (A5), 15 min (A15) and 25 min (A25). c: Clot formation in FIBTEM, specified by MCF and clot diameter after 5 min (A5), 15 min (A15) and 25 min (A25)
Fig. 2Platelet contribution under condition of lethal triad. a: Functional analysis of platelet contribution to clot formation using ROTEG PlateletMapping®. Results are presented as relative changes referring to the respective baseline (set as 100%). Results are marked as statistically significant if error probability was less than 5% (p < 0.05; *). b: Expression levels of CD62 on platelets surface are presented. Respectively, for each condition of lethal triad the expression levels unstimulated are shown (left column, c.f. “control, unstimulated”) and expression levels after stimulation (right column) with ADP/U46619 (left diagram) and with TRAP (right diagram). Results are presented as relative changes referring to the respective baseline (set as 100%). Results are marked as statistically significant if error probability was less than 5% (p < 0.05; *)