| Literature DB >> 30111297 |
Myung-Chul Kim1,2, Sung-Hyun Hwang1,2, Na-Yon Kim1,2, Hong-Seok Lee1,2, Sumin Ji1,2, Yeseul Yang1,2, Yongbaek Kim3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is a hallmark of the solid tumor microenvironment and is associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients. The present study was performed to investigate mechanisms underlying the hypoxia-induced phenotypic changes using human malignant mesothelioma (HMM) cells.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance; EMT; HIFα; Hypoxia; Malignant phenotypes; Mesothelioma; Stemness; Tumor microenvironment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111297 PMCID: PMC6094475 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4720-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1The experimental establishment of tumor hypoxia in HMM cells. (a) Hypoxia markedly increased HIF-1α expression and induced HIF-2α expression de novo in HMM cells. (b) A HIF-1/2α target Glut-1 increased in response to hypoxia and glucose starvation in MS1 cells. Abbreviations: N, normoxia; H, hypoxia
Fig. 2The effect of hypoxia on in vitro clonogenicity in HMM cells. (a) Hypoxia enhanced the colony forming ability of HMM cells. Representative microscopic examinations are presented. P value was calculated by Student’s t-test. Hypoxia significantly upregulated the expression of Oct4 at transcriptional (b) and translational (c) levels in HMM cells. P value was calculated by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test. *P value < 0.05, **P value < 0.01. Abbreviations: N, normoxia; H, hypoxia
Fig. 3The effect of hypoxia on cell proliferation in HMM cells. Hypoxia significantly decreased proliferation and viability in HMM cells at high cell seeding density. (a) Counting cell numbers. (b) MTT assay. The number of cells initially seeded is presented in parentheses. Cell cycle profiles did not appreciably differ between normoxic and hypoxic HMM cells (c). *P value < 0.05, **P value < 0.01, as calculated by Student’s t-test. Abbreviations: N, normoxia; H, hypoxia
Fig. 4The effect of hypoxia on drug sensitivity in HMM cells. MTT assay. The sensitivity to cisplatin was decreased in HMM cells under hypoxia for 24 h (a) and 48 h (b), compared to the sensitivity of those in normoxia. * indicates a significant difference compared with the corresponding normoxic cisplatin-treated control. *P value < 0.05, **P value < 0.01, as calculated by Student’s t-test
Fig. 5The effect of hypoxia on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in HMM cells. (a) Hypoxia significantly reduced apoptosis either with or without cisplatin in HMM cells. (b) Hypoxia upregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, whereas Bcl-xL levels remained almost unchanged in HMM cells. Marked increase in pro-apoptotic Bax expression was detected in MS1 cells only. The ratio of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL to Bax increased in H513 cells. (c) Hypoxia increased Bcl-2 levels and maintained the expression during exposure to cisplatin treatment in HMM cells, compared to the expression level in cells in normoxia. With cisplatin treatment, Bcl-xL expression either tended to decrease or remained unchanged in HMM cells under hypoxia, compared to the level in cells in normoxia. The cisplatin-induced increase in Bax expression was less under hypoxia than under normoxia in MS1 cells. The Bcl-2 to Bax ratio increased in HMM cells under hypoxia following cisplatin. All protein expression was normalized to endogenous β-actin level and is presented as densitometric values at the top of each protein blot. *P value < 0.05, as calculated by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test
Fig. 6The effect of hypoxia on migration and invasion in HMM cells. (a) Hypoxia significantly increased migration in HMM cells. (b) Hypoxia significantly enhanced invasion in H513 cells. (c) Phase contrast images (400× magnification) of HMM cells cultured for 48 h under normoxia or hypoxia are presented. (d) Hypoxia induced a loss of E-cadherin expression and a gain of vimentin expression in HMM cells. E-cadherin expression was not detected in MS1 cells. *P value < 0.05, as calculated by Student’s t-test