Literature DB >> 30110126

Toxic dinoflagellates produce true grazer deterrents.

Jiayi Xu1,2, Thomas Kiørboe1.   

Abstract

Many phytoplankton species produce toxic substances, but their functional role is unclear. Specifically, it remains uncertain whether these compounds have a toxic or deterrent effect on grazers; only, the latter is consistent with toxins as defensive tools. Here, we show that 10 of 12 species or strains of toxic dinoflagellates were consumed at lower rates than a similarly sized nontoxic dinoflagellate by a copepod. Through video observations of individual prey-grazer interactions, we further demonstrate that the dominating mechanism is through capture, examination, and subsequent rejection of vital cells, that is, a true deterrent effect that offers a straightforward explanation to its evolution. We argue that the diversity of grazer responses to toxic phytoplankton reported in the literature, including toxic effects, and the high diversity of toxin profiles between strains of the same phytoplankton species reflect different stages of an ever-ongoing evolutionary arms race, facilitated by rapid adaptation of grazers to toxic substances. We further argue that defensive toxicity requires a chemical signal exterior to the cell that informs the grazer about the toxicity of the cell. The signal can be the toxin itself or just an aposematic signal of toxicity. In the former case, allelochemical effects may emerge at high cell concentrations as a nonadaptive side effect of a predator defenses.
© 2018 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Temora longicorniszzm321990; coevolution; feeding behavior; grazer deterrent; prey rejection; toxic dinoflagellates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30110126     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Predator Chemical Cue Effects on the Diel Feeding Behaviour of Marine Protists.

Authors:  Anna Arias; Erik Selander; Enric Saiz; Albert Calbet
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Costs and benefits of predator-induced defence in a toxic diatom.

Authors:  Anna J Olesen; Fredrik Ryderheim; Bernd Krock; Nina Lundholm; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Predator-induced defence in a dinoflagellate generates benefits without direct costs.

Authors:  Fredrik Ryderheim; Erik Selander; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 11.217

4.  Copepod Prey Selection and Grazing Efficiency Mediated by Chemical and Morphological Defensive Traits of Cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Luciana M Rangel; Lúcia H S Silva; Elisabeth J Faassen; Miquel Lürling; Kemal Ali Ger
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  The Cost of Toxicity in Microalgae: Direct Evidence From the Dinoflagellate Alexandrium.

Authors:  Hannah E Blossom; Bo Markussen; Niels Daugbjerg; Bernd Krock; Andreas Norlin; Per Juel Hansen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  On biological evolution and environmental solutions.

Authors:  Blake Matthews; Jukka Jokela; Anita Narwani; Katja Räsänen; Francesco Pomati; Florian Altermatt; Piet Spaak; Christopher T Robinson; Christoph Vorburger
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Unknown Extracellular and Bioactive Metabolites of the Genus Alexandrium: A Review of Overlooked Toxins.

Authors:  Marc Long; Bernd Krock; Justine Castrec; Urban Tillmann
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.