| Literature DB >> 30110114 |
Vaneza Lira Waldow Wolf1, Juan Eduardo Samur-San-Martin1, Suzy Ferreira de Sousa1, Hemerson Dinis Oliveira Santos2, Augusto Gerhart Folmann1, Roberto Régis Ribeiro3, Gil Guerra-Júnior1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness of educational interventions based on guidance on physical activity and nutrition in schoolchildren. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was carried out in four electronic databases containing articles published between October 2007 and January 2017 and addressing educational interventions with emphasis on both nutritional education and physical activity in schoolchildren and adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve articles were selected for this review, of which four included only educational interventions; four made and association between educational interventions, inclusion of healthy foods and physical activity; two made a relation between guidelines and physical activity; and finally, two associated guidelines with consumption of healthy foods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30110114 PMCID: PMC6362366 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;1;00015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr ISSN: 0103-0582
Figure 1:Article selection flow chart.
Description of studies based on educational interventions only.
| Study | Sample | Goals | Intervention | Evaluation | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casazza and Ciccazzo, 2007 |
3 schools Age range: 13-18 years. CON: n=1,599; CBI: n=2,565; TDI: n=2,573 | To compare the results of two methods of service delivery to health education programs in order to determine whether the strategy was effective to adolescents adopting a healthier lifestyle. |
11 weeks. CON: recruitment and evaluations. CBI: CD-ROM education, study guide. TDI: lectures, leaflets | Weight; BMI; 24-hour reminder; FFQ; nutritional knowledge questionnaire; PAQ-a; trust on diet and exercise survey; social support survey; questionnaires after the intervention. |
BMI: no difference between groups, but TDI group presented pre<post reduction (23.1±0.7 to 22.9±0.7, p<0.001). Knowledge about nutrition: CON = CBI = TDI; CBI< knowledge of nutrition, pre- and post- (40.4+1.25 to 53.2+1.19, p<0.001); TDI> knowledge about pre- and post-nutrition (42.8±1.19 to 50.9±1.12, p=0.003). Physical activity: CON = CBI = TDI. Physical activity pre<post: CBI (17.6±5.92 to 19.6±5.82, p=0.005); Calories intake: pre<post: CBI (p=0.006); TDI (p=0.009). Fat intake: CBI pre<post (p<0.001); CON = TDI. Meals ignored: CBI pre<post (p=0.001). Social support in diet: CBI and TDI pre<post (p<0.001). |
| Fairclough et al., 2013 |
12 schools Age range: 10-11 years; CG: n=152; IG=166 | To evaluate the effectiveness of the program “Change” in body composition, physical activity practice and food consumption. |
20-week intervention and 10-week IG: 20 weekly lesson plans, homework, spreadsheets and a CD-ROM. CG: received information during school classes, but not related to the program. | Weight, BMI, waist circumference, accelerometers, 24-hour record, APHV and 20m SRT |
waist circumference: IG≠CG pre-post: IG> WC (β=-1.63 (95%CI -2.20--1.07) cm, p<0.001). zBMI and LPA: IG≠CG pre- WC: OW≠NW, OW>WC (β=-2.82 (95%CI -4.06--1.58) cm, p<0.001) NW (β=-1.34 (95%CI -2.00--0.72) cm, p<0.001). Girls >BMI e zBMI: BMI (β=-0.39 (95%CI -0.81-0.03) kg/m2, p=0.07) zBMI (β=-0.18 (95%CI -0.42-0.06) cm, p=0.14). Boys <BMI e zBMI: BMI (β=0.47 (95%CI 0.03-0.91)) kg/m2, p=0.04) zIMC (β=0.27 (95%CI 0.02-0.52) cm, p=0.04). |
| Ezendam et al., 2012 |
20 schools Age range: 12-13 years; IG: 11 schools (n=485); CG: 9 schools (n=398) | To check the relevance and understanding, as well as news about information provided by FATaintPHAT, and the association between behaviors after four months of follow-up. |
10 weeks IG: eight 15-minute lessons via internet. CG: recruitment and assessment | Weight, waist circumference, BMI. Pedometers in five students per class for seven consecutive days, questionnaire after each module, food frequency questionnaire, food frequency questionnaire for snacks, leisure physical activity questionnaire, active transport and screen time, questionnaire for frequency of activities for more than 60 minutes, demographic data questionnaire. |
4 months IG≠CG IG> intake of more than 400 mL of sugary beverages. IG> intake of snacks per day (β=0.81 snacks/day). IG< intake of vegetables (β=19.3 g/d). IG< intake of fruit (β=19.3 g/d). IG> steps (β=-10.856 steps/week). No effect on weight, BMI, waist circumference and physical activity. Also no difference in 2-year follow-up. |
CON: control; CBI: computer based education; TDI: traditional education; CG: control group; IG: intervention group; BMI: body mass index; FFQ: Food Frequency Questionnaire; PAQ-a: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents; APHV: age at peak height velocity; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; zBMI: BMI Z-score; LPA: leisure physical activity; p: statistical significance; WC: waist circumference; OW: overweight or obese; NW: normal weight; :β: regression coefficient; 20m SRT: 20-m shuttle test.
Description of studies based on educational interventions associated with nutritional counseling.
| Study | Sample | Goals | Intervention | Evaluation | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kong et al., 2013 |
Two schools Students and parents/caregivers Action: n=28 Mean age: 15±1 year. SCG: n=23 Mean age:14.6±0.7 | To evaluate whether the Action program could reduce zBMI in IG when compared to SCG. |
During school year. Action: eight motivational meetings, DVD, assessment results, print material, recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics + information leaflets for parents. SCG: one visit upon intervention start, brochure on “balance for a healthy life”, assessment results, recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics. | Weight, BMI, hematocrit in girls, cholesterol, FitnessGram Pacer, research on changes in living habits, diabetes and liver fat tests in obese or overweight students with family history of diabetes. |
zBMI pre-post: Action ≠SCG, Action>zBMI =(=-0.3 (95%CI -0.6-0.3), SCG (=0.2 (95%CI -0.1-0.8) (p=0.04). WC pre-post: Action ≠ SCG, Action >WC =(=-0.0 (95%CI -1.4-1.4), SCG (=1.7 (95%CI 0.4-2.9) (p=0.04). Screen time on week days pre-post: Action ≠SCG: Action>SCG =(=-0.4 (95%CI -1.0-0.2), SCG (= 0.2 (95%CI 0.3-0.6) (p=0.03). |
| Jago et al., 2011 |
42 schools Mean age: 11.3±0.6 IG: n=3,222; CG: n=3,191. | To investigate whether the intervention program “Healthy” led participants to increase their levels of physical activity, and the prevalence of metabolic diseases, comparing IG with CG. |
2,5 years. IG: inclusion of healthy food in diet, Flash, social marketing campaign and more active physical education classes social. CG: recruitment and assessment. | Weight, BMI, waist circumference, 20-m shuttle test (20-MST), SAPAC, MPVA time, lab tests (LDL, HDL cholesterol) and blood pressure. | No statistically significant difference in any test. |
| Willi et al., 2012 |
42 schools Age range: 11-14 years IG: n=2,185; CG: n=2,178 | To examine the effects of the intervention program “Healthy” on cardiovascular risk factors. |
2.5 years. IG: changes in eating habits and in physical activity practice, social marketing campaign to reinforce messages and images. CG: recruitment and assessment. | Weight, BMI, lab tests (LDL, HDL cholesterol) and blood pressure. | No statistically significant difference in any test. |
SCG: standard care group; CG: control group; IG: intervention group; BMI: body mass index; zBMI: BMI Z-score; Action: intervention group; Flash: Fun Learning Activities for Student Health; SAPAC: Self-Administered Physical Activity Checklist; MPVA: moderate to vigorous physical activity; LDL: low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein; : mean; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; WC: waist circumference; p: statistical significance.
Description of studies based on educational interventions associated with physical activity orientation or practice.
| Study | Sample | Goals | Intervention | Evaluation | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Love-Osborne et al., 2014 |
Two schools CG: n=83 Mean age: 16±1.5 years. IG: n=82 Mean age: 15.7±1.5 years. | To evaluate whether the program “HE” promotes more contact with students and improves lifestyle and results in BMI in overweight adolescents. | IG: healthy eating in school environment or the community, orientation for 1 hour of daily physical activity, self-monitoring by weekly records; IG TM: received electronic messages; IG NMT: did not receive messages. CG: preventive service, assessments | Peso, IMC, hematocrit in girls, cholesterol, FitnessGram Pacer, research on changes in living habits, diabetes and liver fat tests in obese or overweight students with family history of diabetes. |
zBMI: 55% of IG and 72% of CG had zIMC reduced or stable (p=0.025); 40% of CG and 18% of IG had zIMC reduced (p=0.02). Participation in sports: 47% of CG and 28% of IG (p=0.02) Sports practice: CG>IG (47% Students aged > 15 years had better results in zIMC reduction (p=0.03). |
| Johnston et al., 2007 |
71 schoolchildren. Age range: 10-14 years. II: n=46 SH: n=25 | To evaluate the effect of a randomized intervention in school environment as to weight loss in overweight schoolchildren. |
24 weeks II: 12 weeks of physical activity, nutritional counseling, inclusion of healthy foods, monthly meetings with parents, guidance material and 12 biweekly follow-up sessions. SH: book | Weight, BMI, lab tests (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, glucose), blood pressure and body fat percentage with electric bio-impedance scale. |
IMC: II≠SH, II>IMC (p=0.004). II>zBMI at three and six months (p=0.001). Body fat percentage: II≠SH at six months, II> body fat percentage (p=0.001) |
| Johnston et al., 2010 |
71 schoolchildren. Age range: 10-14 years. II: n=40 SH: n=20 | To verify long-term effectiveness of the intervention program carried out by Johnston | 1 and 2-year follow-up of the study conducted by Johnston et al. | Weight, BMI, lab tests (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, glucose), blood pressure and body fat percentage with electric bio-impedance scale and triceps fold. |
1 and 2-year follow-up II≠ SH II >zBMI, SH (p<0.001); II: 1 and 2 years (p<0.001, p<0.05). 1-year II>BMI (p<0.001); II>Weight (p<0.001) II>overweight percentage (p<0.001). II>cholesterol (p<0.05), II>triglycerides (p<0.05) II>triceps fold (p<0.01). |
CG: control group; IG: intervention group; II: intensive intervention; SH: self-help only condition; HE: Health Educator; BMI: body mass index; TM: text messages; NTM: no text messages; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; zBMI: BMI Z score; p: statistical significance. : mean
Description of studies based on educational interventions associated with physical activity orientation or practice and nutritional counseling.
| Study | Sample | Goals | Intervention | Evaluation | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McFarlin et al., 2013 |
Age range: 12-14 years IG: n=152; SH: n=69 | To validate a school-based intervention along 12 months, using plasma, resistin, adipokine, leptin concentrations and biological results. | IG: physical activity practice, nutritional counseling, SH: instruction manual on weight loss and weight maintenance. | Weight, BMI, blood plasma (resistin, adiponectin and leptin). |
Pre-post zBMI: IG ≠SH 6 months, IG>zBMI IG (-0.211±0.005) Pre-post six months resistin = IG≠ SH, IG> resistin in six months (p=0.001). Adipokine= IG ≠SH, six months (p<0.001); 12 months (p<0.001). Pre-post 12 months Leptin: IG≠SH, IG>leptin (p=0.013) |
| Covell, 2008 |
62 schoolchildren Age range: 14-17 years IG: n=37 CG: n=25 | To raise the level of knowledge about health, increase daily exercise practice, increase intake of fruits and vegetables, maintain blood pressure levels. |
Nine weeks. IG: classes with lectures and discussions, physical exercise, guidelines on diet and exercise and self-reported food consumption and weekly practice of exercises. CG: Life Management Class, theoretical intervention. | Blood pressure, demographic data, physical activity questionnaire, nutrition questionnaire with 2-day recall report and test for knowledge about health. |
Pre-post knowledge: IG≠CG, IG<knowledge (p=0.0001). Pre-post fruit and vegetable intake IG≠CG, IG< fruit and vegetable intake (p=0.0001). Pre-post physical activity practice: IG≠CG, IG> physical activity practice (p=0.0001), superior among girls. |
| Grydeland et al., 2014 |
37 schools. Mean age: 11,2 ± 0,3 IG: n=465 CG: n=859 | To investigate the effectiveness of a 20-month HEIA intervention program. | IG: classes, posters, inclusion of fruits and vegetables in diet, regular physical activity, campaigns for active transportation, online counseling, school and parents meetings, information leaflets for parents and a machine for cutting and selling fruit and vegetables. CG: recruitment and assessment. | Weight, BMI, height-to-waist ratio, pubertal stage, parents’ educational level, demographic characteristics. |
No significant differences in body composition between groups. Parents with low educational level, pre-post: IG >CG: 0.426 (0.422 to 0.430) CG 0.420 (0.417 to 0.423) (p=0.020) Parents with high educational level: IG>CG, pre - = 18.6 (95%CI 18.5-18.8) -; post- =18.4 (95%CI 18.2-18.6) (p=0.027) Girls IG≠CG pre-post IG>BMI, IG - =19.2 (95%CI 19.1-19.3); CG - =19.0 (95%CI 18.8-19.3) (p=0.02); IG>zBMI, IG - =0.03 (95%CI -0.01-0.08); CG - =-0.8 (95%CI -0.14--0.02) (p=0.003). |
IG: intervention group; SH: self-help only condition; CG: control group; BMI: body mass index; zBMI: BMI Z score; p: statistical significance; : mean; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.