Literature DB >> 30109584

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis mRNA using digital PCR as a more accurate marker of viable organism.

Samuel Phillips1,2,3, Lenka A Vodstrcil4,5,6, Wilhelmina M Huston7, Amba Lawerence8, Peter Timms9, Marcus Y Chen4,6, Karen Worthington6, Ruthy McIver10, Catriona S Bradshaw6, Suzanne M Garland11,5,12, Sepehr N Tabrizi11,5,12, Jane S Hocking5.   

Abstract

Spontaneous resolution of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) without treatment has previously been described, but a limitation of these reports is that DNA or RNA-based amplification tests used do not differentiate between viable infection and non-viable DNA. We modified a previously published CT mRNA detection (omp2) method to differentiate between viable infection and non-viable DNA in a sample of CT DNA PCR positive women. We modified a CT mRNA detection (omp2) method from reverse transcriptase qPCR (RTqPCR) to digital PCR (dPCR) and evaluated it in samples from CT DNA positive women. Firstly, CT infected McCoy B cells treated with azithromycin in vitro identified detectable mRNA levels disappeared <2 days, while DNA persisted up to 6 days. We used 55 self-collected vaginal swabs from a cohort of women diagnosed as DNA positive for chlamydia obtained pre- and 7 days of post-azithromycin treatment. Concordance with DNA results was higher for dPCR than RTqPCR (74.5% versus 65.5%). At visit 1, there was a strong linear relationship between DNA and mRNA (r = 0.9, p < 0.000); 24 samples had both mRNA and DNA detected (82.8%) and 5 had only DNA detected with a potential false positive proportion of 17.2% (95%CI: 5.8, 35.8). At visit 2, there was poor correlation between DNA and mRNA (r = 0.14, p = 0.55); eight specimens had only DNA detected (42.1%; 95%CI: 20.25, 66.50) and one had mRNA detected. DNA detection methods alone may detect non-viable DNA. Consideration should be given to further develop mRNA assays as ancillary tests to improve detection of viable chlamydia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia; DNA; Resolution; mRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30109584     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3347-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  1 in total

1.  Spontaneous resolution of extragenital chlamydial and gonococcal infections prior to therapy.

Authors:  Senu K Apewokin; William M Geisler; Laura H Bachmann
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.830

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  In-cell western assay as a high-throughput approach for Chlamydia trachomatis quantification and susceptibility testing to antimicrobials.

Authors:  Simone Filardo; Marisa Di Pietro; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Martina Manera; Fabiana Diaco; Rosa Sessa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Chlamydiae from Down Under: The Curious Cases of Chlamydial Infections in Australia.

Authors:  Martina Jelocnik
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 3.  Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Ymke J Evers; Christian J P A Hoebe; Petra F G Wolffs; Henry J C de Vries; Bernice Hoenderboom; Marianne A B van der Sande; Janneke Heijne; Jeffrey D Klausner; Jane S Hocking; Jan van Bergen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Sensitive and visual identification of Chlamydia trachomatis using multiple cross displacement amplification integrated with a gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor for point-of-care use.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Wei Yuan; Qingxue Zhou; Yan Tan; Ronghua Wang; Shilei Dong
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.073

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.