PURPOSE: Inferior vena cava filter fracture (FF) may cause life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade, although the actual prevalence remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of FF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on fracture incidence with filter brands, filter positions [suprarenal (SR) vs. infrarenal (IR)], and follow-up durations were collected from the databases of eight hospitals. RESULTS: Of 532 patients, Günther Tulip (GT), Trap/OptEase (TE/OE), ALN and VenaTech (VT) were implanted in 345, 147, 38 and 2 patients, respectively. Of these, filter retrieval was attempted in 110 (21.7%) patients and was successful in 106 (96.4%). Of the remaining 426 patients, FFs were observed in two (0.7%) of 270 GT filters and 19 (14.1%) of 135 TE/OE filters. Fragment embolization occurred in one patient with a GT filter (50.0%) and three with a TE/OE filter (15.8%) with a total follow-up interval of 718.0 ± 1019.4 days. FF occurred more frequently in TE/OE than in GT filters (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed significantly higher fracture-free rates for GT than TE/OE (p < 0.001) and IR-TE/OE than SR-TE/OE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TE/OE filters are not suitable for permanent implantation due to the relatively early and high fracture rates.
PURPOSE: Inferior vena cava filter fracture (FF) may cause life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade, although the actual prevalence remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of FF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on fracture incidence with filter brands, filter positions [suprarenal (SR) vs. infrarenal (IR)], and follow-up durations were collected from the databases of eight hospitals. RESULTS: Of 532 patients, Günther Tulip (GT), Trap/OptEase (TE/OE), ALN and VenaTech (VT) were implanted in 345, 147, 38 and 2 patients, respectively. Of these, filter retrieval was attempted in 110 (21.7%) patients and was successful in 106 (96.4%). Of the remaining 426 patients, FFs were observed in two (0.7%) of 270 GT filters and 19 (14.1%) of 135 TE/OE filters. Fragment embolization occurred in one patient with a GT filter (50.0%) and three with a TE/OE filter (15.8%) with a total follow-up interval of 718.0 ± 1019.4 days. FF occurred more frequently in TE/OE than in GT filters (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed significantly higher fracture-free rates for GT than TE/OE (p < 0.001) and IR-TE/OE than SR-TE/OE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TE/OE filters are not suitable for permanent implantation due to the relatively early and high fracture rates.
Authors: Nicholas A Rogers; Lynn Nguyen; Nicole E Minniefield; Michael E Jessen; James A de Lemos Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M L Friedell; R J Goldenkranz; V Parsonnet; J Alpert; D K Brief; B J Brener; F M Aueron Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1986-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: J Werner Ziegler; Gary J Dietrich; Sidney A Cohen; Keith Sterling; James Duncan; Michael Samotowka Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Eric K Hoffer; Rebecca J Mueller; Marcus R Luciano; Nicole N Lee; Anne T Michaels; John M Gemery Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 2.740