Literature DB >> 30109485

Limited sensitivity and size over measurements of ultrasound affect medical decisions for ureteral stone compared to non-contrasted computed tomography.

Lei Hanqi1,2, Tang Fucai1,2, Zhang Caixia3, Zhong Shuman4, Zeng Guohua1, He Zhaohui5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the limited sensitivity and size over measurements of ultrasound (US) for ureteral stone, and demonstrate how this influenced medical decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed the data of patients with ureterolithiasis estimated by US and non-contrasted computed tomography (NCCT) within 48 h at our institution from January 1st 2014 to June 1st 2017. Stone size was grouped by the longest axis diameter on NCCT: < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm. Then, US and NCCT results were compared for the sensitivity and measurements.
RESULTS: A total of 614 cases of ureterolithiasis were visible on NCCT. The sensitivity of US for ureterolithiasis < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm were 63.49, 79.06, and 84.67%, respectively (P = 0.001). US overestimated the size in 63.49 and 50.54% of patients with ureterolithiasis < 5 and 5-10 mm compared to NCCT, respectively (P < 0.001). Under the assumptions that patients with ureteral stone < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm would be simply observed, received medical expulsive therapy (MET), and surgical interventions, 20.94 and 15.33% of patients with stone sized 5-10 and > 10 mm might be improperly observed due to negative US reports. Besides, 63.49 and 50.54% of cases with stone < 5 and 5-10 mm might receive more aggressive interventions ascribed to over measurements of US.
CONCLUSIONS: Limited sensitivity and size over measurements of US might significantly influence medical decisions for ureteral stone. Inaccurate evaluation of US should be taken in consideration for appropriate counseling options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical decisions; Non-contrast computed tomography; Over measurement; Ultrasound; Ureteral stone

Year:  2018        PMID: 30109485     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2444-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

1.  Can negative ureteroscopy be predicted in ureteral stone treatment?

Authors:  Mehmet Oguz Sahin; Volkan Sen; Bora Irer; Guner Yildiz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Onur Kaygisiz; Mehmet Cagatay Cicek; Ahmet Mert; Selcan Akesen; Emre Sarandol; Hakan Kilicarslan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Garson Chan; Johan Gani
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-08-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.