| Literature DB >> 30109280 |
Ali ElBakri1, Lazarus Mogane2, Sinda Ezzedine1, Natasha Potgieter2, Pascal Bessong3, Raed AbuOdeh1, Amidou Samie2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data on Cryptosporidium infections in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is scarce. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of Cryptosporidium species among a community of expatriates in Sharjah, UAE working in different sectors, including the food industry, house maids and other domestic occupations.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; PCR; Sharjah; United Arab Emirates; prevalence
Year: 2018 PMID: 30109280 PMCID: PMC6085736 DOI: 10.21010/ajid.v12i2.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Infect Dis ISSN: 2006-0165
Figure 1Amplification curves for Cryptosporidium spp. in isolates from Sharjah, UAE.
Rate of infection with Cryptosporidium according to nationality
| Country of origin | No. of | Total no. of expats examined |
|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 3 (33.3%) | 9 |
| Bangladesh | 6 (24%) | 25 |
| Egypt | 1 (25%) | 4 |
| Ethiopia | 1 (16.7%) | 6 |
| India | 11 (20.4%) | 54 |
| Indonesia | 0 | 3 |
| Iraq | 0 | 1 |
| Jordan | 0 | 1 |
| Nepal | 0 | 4 |
| Pakistan | 2 (14.3%) | 14 |
| Philippines | 2 (25%) | 8 |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 3 |
| Sudan | 0 | 1 |
| Tanzania | 0 | 1 |
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium with respect to socio-demographic characteristics of the study population
| Characteristics | No. examined | Positive No (%) | χ2 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 103 | 23 (22.3%) | 2.439 | 0.118 |
| Female | 31 | 3 (9.7%) | ||
| Age group | ||||
| 25 years or less | 41 | 10 (24.4%) | 1.219 | 0.544 |
| 26-45 years | 73 | 12 (16.4%) | ||
| >45 years | 19 | 3 (15.8%) |
The frequency of Cryptosporidium appearing in mono- and co-infections.
| Type of infection | No | Total No | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single infection | 8 | 30.7 | |
| Double infection | 12 | 46.2 | |
| 1 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 2 | |||
| Triple infection | 4 | 15.4 | |
| 3 | |||
| 1 | |||
| Quadruple infection | 2 | 7.7 | |
| 1 | |||
| 1 | 26 134 | 19.4 |
Note: *, **, *** The specific species of Entamoeba in the table was obtained from data published earlier by the author (ElBakri et al. 2013; 2014).