| Literature DB >> 30109109 |
Ibanga Okon Isaac1, Iqra Munir1, Mariya Al-Rashida2, Syed Abid Ali1, Zahid Shafiq3, Muhammad Islam3, Ralf Ludwig4,5, Khurshid Ayub6, Khalid Mohammed Khan1,7, Abdul Hameed1.
Abstract
New thiosemicarbazide-linked acridines 3a-c were prepared and investigated as chemosensors for the detection of biologically and environmentally important anions. The compounds 3a-c were found selective for fluoride (F-) with no affinity for other anions, i.e. -OAc, Br-, I-, HSO4-, SO42-, PO43-, ClO3-, ClO4-, CN- and SCN-. Further, upon the gradual addition of a fluoride anion (F-) source (tetrabutylammonium fluoride), a well-defined change in colour of the solution of probes 3a-c was observed. The anion-sensing process was studied in detail via UV-visible absorption, fluorescence and 1H-NMR experiments. Moreover, during the synthesis of acridine probes 3a-c nickel fluoride (NiF2), a rarely explored transition metal fluoride salt, was used as the catalyst. Theoretical studies via density functional theory were also carried out to further investigate the sensing and anion (F-) selectivity pattern of these probes.Entities:
Keywords: UV absorption; acridine; density functional theory calculations; fluorescence; fluoride (F−); thiosemicarbazides
Year: 2018 PMID: 30109109 PMCID: PMC6083729 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Acridine-based compounds.
Scheme 1.Synthetic layout for acridine-based probes 3a–c.
Characteristic 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HMBC correlation data of 3b. .
| atom no. | HMBC correlations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/8 (C) | — | 152.1 | — |
| 2/7 (CH2) | 2.49 (obscured by DMSO signal) /2.23 (d, | 38.2 | NHb, C-1/8, C-4/5, C-3/6, C-10/13, (CH3)2 |
| 3/6 (C) | — | 30.3 | — |
| 4/5 (CH2) | 2.31 (d, | 39.3 | NH, C-2/7, C-3/6, C-10/13, C-11/12, (CH3)2 |
| 9 (CH) | 5.27 | 35.9 | C-1/8, C-2′′/6′′, C-10/13, C-11/12 |
| 10/13 (C) | — | 106.7 | — |
| 11/12 (C) | — | 140.1 | — |
| 1′/1′ (C) | — | 126.6/126.5 | — |
| 2′/2′ (C) | — | 157.2/154.2 | — |
| 3′/3′ (CH) | 6.92 (m) | 115.2/115.1 | C-1′, C-2′, C-5′ |
| 4′/4′ (CH) | 7.22–7.18 (m) | 126.9/126.8 | C-2′, C-6′ |
| 5′/5′ (CH) | 7.10 (t, | 123.6 | C-1′, C-3′ |
| 6′/6′ (CH) | 7.64 (t, | 128.2 | C-2′, C-4′ |
| 1′′ (C) | — | 148.4 | — |
| 2′′/6′′ (CH) | 7.31 (d, | 128.0 | C-4′′, C6′′/C-2′′, C-4′′ |
| 3′′/4′′/5′′ (CH) | 6.96–6.90 (m) | 127.2/125.2 | C-1′′, C-5′′/C-2′′, C-6′′ /C-1′′, C-3′′ |
| N | 9.23 | — | C-1′, C-6′ |
| N | 10.32 | — | C-1/8, C=S |
| N | 8.79 | — | C-10/13, C-4/5 |
| C=S | — | 175.8 | — |
| C(CH3)2 | 1.03 | — | C-2/7, C-4/5 |
| C(CH3)2 | 0.82 | — | C-2/7, C-4/5 |
Figure 2.Acridine-based probe 3a: selective sensing of F− among different anions; 3b: gradual addition of fluoride (0–30 equiv.) anions (naked eye view).
Figure 3.(a) UV absorption spectra of probe 3a, (b) absorption spectra of probe 3a upon gradual increase of fluoride addition, (c) upon dilution in methanol absorbance of 3a is restored and (d) fluorescence spectra of receptor 3a (excitation at 270 nm) upon the gradual increase of fluoride anions by using DMSO/acetonitrile as the solvent.
Binding constants and detection limits of receptors 3a–c for fluoride anion detection.
| comp. no. | binding constant (M−1) | detection limit (M) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.66 × 102 | 6.879 × 10−5 | |
| 4.48 × 103 | 9.08 × 10−5 | |
| 2.86 × 103 | 6.17 × 10−5 |
Figure 4.Fluoride (F−) anion gradual addition to probe 3b: 1H-NMR spectra (a) without F− anion, (b) 1 equiv., (c) 2 equiv. and (d) 4 equiv. of F−source (TBAF) in DMSO-d as the solvent.
Scheme 2.Fluoride interaction with thiosemicarbazone-linked acridine.
Figure 5.Description of degree of freedom for conformational and configurational isomerism.
Figure 6.The optimized geometries of the lowest energy conformer of 3a (a) and its 1 : 3 complex with fluoride ions (b).
Total binding energies and binding energies per anion of probes 3a–c for F−, Cl−, Br−, OAc− and CN−.
| F− | Cl− | Br− | OAc− | CN− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total binding energies (kcal mol−1) | |||||
| | −383.97 | −226.80 | −216.86 | −259.54 | −242.45 |
| | −383.25 | −227.25 | −217.25 | −256.63 | −242.14 |
| | −386.43 | −227.50 | −217.49 | −259.80 | −242.24 |
| binding energies per anion (kcal mol−1) | |||||
| | −127.99 | −75.60 | −72.29 | −86.51 | −80.82 |
| | −127.75 | −75.75 | −72.42 | −85.54 | −80.72 |
| | −128.81 | −75.83 | −72.50 | −86.60 | −80.75 |
Figure 7.UV–Vis spectra of probe 3a and its complexes with various anions, calculated at (TD)CAM-B3LYP/6-311G(d,p).
Changes in the absorption maxima of 3a–c on complexation with various anions, calculated at CAM-B3LYP/6–311G(d,p).
| F− | 391.78 | 303.32 | 382.96 | 295.46 | 400.27 | 296.59 |
| Cl− | 347.95 | 276.75 | 345.36 | 272.94 | 345.76 | 272.82 |
| Br− | 346.37 | 276.76 | 344.64 | 272.90 | 345.93 | 272.92 |
| OAc− | 363.26 | 287.14 | 347.80 | 284.22 | 359.12 | 283.79 |
| CN− | 358.64 | 284.24 | 357.28 | 282.35 | 354.15 | 277.72 |