| Literature DB >> 30109069 |
Liang Zheng1,2, Jianfei Wan1, Yunjiang Long1, Helin Fu1, Jing Zheng1, Zhongrong Zhou1.
Abstract
Generally minimally invasive surgery is performed using an endoscope and other instruments including electrosurgical units (ESUs), and the adhesion of tissue to electrodes is a major concern. The mechanism governing this tissue sticking, especially the influence of high-frequency electric field, is still unclear. In this study, the effect of high-frequency electric field on the tissue sticking upon electrodes was investigated. The electrosurgical cutting test was performed on ex vivo fresh porcine liver under blend mode using a monopolar ESU. A heat-adherence test without electric field was used as a control. For the control group, the electrode was heated and maintained at a certain temperature and directly in contact with porcine liver. Both sticking tissues obtained from these two tests are partiallyEntities:
Keywords: electrode surface; high-frequency electric field; interfacial binding strength; minimally invasive electrosurgical device; tissue sticking
Year: 2018 PMID: 30109069 PMCID: PMC6083695 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Electrosurgical cutting experimental set-up and electrode sample. (a) Electrosurgical cutting experimental set-up, 1—ESU, 2—feeding device, 3—active electrode pen, 4—active electrode, 5—porcine liver, 6—dispersive electrode, 7—locating device. (b) Standard blade-type 304 stainless steel monopolar active electrode.
Figure 2.Schematic diagrams of heat-adherence test and thermographs. (a) Schema of heat-adherence test. (b) Thermograph of heat-adherence test, side view. (c) Thermograph of heat-adherence test, front view. (d) Thermograph of electrosurgical cutting.
Figure 3.Schematic representation of tensile test sample preparation.
Figure 4.SEM micrographs and EDX spectra of electrode surfaces. (a) SEM micrograph of original electrode; (b) EDX spectrum of original electrode; (c) SEM micrograph after electrosurgical cutting test; (d) EDX spectrum after electrosurgical cutting test; (e) SEM micrograph after heat-adherence test and (f) EDX spectrum after the heat-adherence test.
Figure 5.FTIR spectra of sticking tissues on electrode surfaces after the two tests.
Figure 6.SEM micrographs of electrode cross-sections: (a) after the electrosurgical cutting test and (b) after the heat-adherence test.
Figure 7.Three-dimensional morphologies of cleaned surfaces of electrodes: (a) original electrode; (b) after the electrosurgical cutting test and (c) after the heat-adherence test.
Tensile properties of sticking tissue–electrode interface after the electrosurgical cutting test and the heat-adherence test.
| after electrosurgical cutting test | after heat-adherence test | |
|---|---|---|
| critical force | 133.4 ± 19.81 | 8.6 ± 2.3 |
| binding strength | 8.34 ± 0.89 | 0.53 ± 0.14 |
| energy dissipation | 5.56 ± 0.57 | 0.18 ± 0.07 |
Figure 8.OM micrographs of electrode surfaces after tensile testing: (a) original electrode as a control; (b) electrode from the heat-adherence test and (c) electrode from the electrosurgical cutting test.
Figure 9.Histological examples of porcine liver tissue sample after the electrosurgical cutting test.
Figure 10.SEM micrograph and EDX spectrum of the electrode surface after smoke collection: (a) SEM micrograph and (b) EDX spectrum.
Figure 11.Schematic diagrams of porcine liver tissue, electrosurgery procedure and formation process of sticking tissue upon electrode: (a) porcine liver tissue; (b) electrosurgery procedure and (c) formation process of sticking tissue upon electrode.