| Literature DB >> 30108372 |
Atsushi Maruyama1, Jun'ichiro Takemura2, Hayato Sawada2, Takaaki Kaneko3, Yukihiro Kohmatsu4, Atsushi Iriguchi5.
Abstract
To complement literature-based historical knowledge of the eating habits of 17th- and 18th-century Japan, we analysed carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N, respectively) of human hairs embedded in cover paper of Japanese books printed during 1690s-1890s, taking regional and temporal variations into consideration. We purchased 24 book sets from second-hand book markets. Twenty-three sets contained enough human hairs, which were non-destructively extracted from the thick, recycled paper of the book covers and used to measure the δ13C and δ15N values, found to be identical within each book set. Relatively low δ13C values and high δ15N values suggested that people depended on rice, C3 vegetables, and fish, more exclusively than contemporary Japanese people. The relatively high δ13C values found in Edo (Tokyo) might be associated with the preference for C4 millets by Edo people as a measure against beriberi (locally recognised as the Edo affliction). The δ15N values gradually increased over 200 years, indicating an increase in the contribution of marine fish both as food and fertiliser for rice fields as suggested by literature-based studies. Further collection of hairs from books will enable a thorough examination of regional and temporal variations to better understand the pre-globalised food culture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30108372 PMCID: PMC6092321 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30617-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Photographs of an old book printed in the early modern Japan with human hairs. (a) External appearance of a book. (b) The recycled thick paper used for the cover (right side), where human hairs were embedded. (c,d) Human hairs embedded in the recycled thick paper of the book cover.
List of the collected old book sets, from which human hairs were extracted for isotope analysis.
| Publication/Printing | Numbers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Latest year | Lag | Latest publisher | City | Volumes | Hairs | Analysis |
| unregistered | 1696 | <10 | Kawakatsu, G. | Kyoto | 1 | 30 | 2 |
| 100182758 | 1712 | 0 | Masu-ya, G. | Edo/Tokyo | 3 | 20 | 9 |
| 1039298 | 1694 | 20 | unknown | Kyoto* | 1 | 138 | 3 |
| 588 | 1718 | 10 | Izumi-ya Yamaguchi, M. | Kyoto | 5 | 35 | 12 |
| 32940 | 1685 | 50 | unknown | Kyoto* | 1 | 105 | 2 |
| 57103 | J1753 | 10 | Horino-ya, J. | Tokyo | 1 | 190 | 1 |
| 1053505 | 1771 |
| Kawachi-ya, G. | Osaka | 1 | 408 | 3 |
| 64755 | J1803 | <10 | Suda | Kyoto | 5 | 1000 | 15 |
| 6735 | 1791 | 30 | Shojoke-in | Kyoto | 2 | 303 | 6 |
| 1034351 | 1776 | 50 | Kiku-ya, K. | Kyoto | 1 | 173 | 3 |
| 420199 | 1832 | <10 | Tawara-ya, J. | Kyoto | 1 | 78 | 3 |
| 1558232 | 1785 | 50 | Kiku-ya, S. | Kyoto | 1 | 830 | 3 |
| 5674 | 1838 | <10 | Kawachi-ya, H. | Osaka | 1 | 740 | 2 |
| 39474 | 1838 | <10 | Suhara-ya, I. | Edo/Tokyo | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| 1013429 | 1838 | <10 | Kyoei-sya, S. | Edo/Tokyo | 1 | 73 | 3 |
| 490095 | 1839 | 0 | Itami-ya, Z. | Osaka | 1 | 84 | 3 |
| 55118 | 1690 |
| Hase-dera | Edo/Tokyo | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 1070548 | 1843 | <10 | Izumi-ya, I. | Edo/Tokyo | 1 | 49 | 3 |
| 26120 | 1854 | <10 | Mino-ya, S. | Nagoya | 8 | 179 | 22 |
| 61698 | 1857 | <10 | Kohchi-ya, H. | Osaka | 3 | 97 | 9 |
| 2631 | 1860 | <10 | Fujii, M. | Kyoto | 3 | 338 | 9 |
| 1715033 | 1861 | <10 | Seisyuh-bou | Osaka | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| 13376 | 1854 | 20 | Maekawa, G. | Kyoto | 1 | 18 | 1 |
| 557222 | 1865 | 30 | Hishi-ya, M. | Kyoto | 5 | 25 | 13 |
Isotope ratios of 130 hair samples extracted from these book sets are available as Supplementary Tables S1–S3.
ID: document identification number by the National Institute of Japanese Literature, with which information including author name, title, and publication year is available in Japanese language at its web site (http://base1.nijl.ac.jp/infolib/meta_pub/G0001401KTG). Jbefore Latest year: printing year was only available from the preface. Lag: estimated elapsed time (year) after publication until printing (book sets with bold figures had two estimates different from each other by >30 years). *after City: printing city was estimated. Number of volumes: number of book volumes from which human hairs were extracted. Number of hairs: number of fragmented human hairs (of any length) observed in the book. Number of analysis: replications in the isotope analysis.
Figure 2Scatter plots for the δ13C and δ15N values in human hairs and foods in Japan. Each solid coloured circle indicates mean δ13C and δ15N values of human hairs from the volumes that were concurrently printed with the same title (this study). Different colours indicate different printing cities. Bars are SD. (a) Comparison to the mean δ13C and δ15N values in the hairs of contemporary Japanese people in the corresponding regions (coloured open circles)[23]. (b) Comparison to the mean δ13C and δ15N values of human hairs in contemporary Japan (open black circles)[18,20,26]. Dotted squares indicate ranges of means + hair-specific TDFs (trophic discrimination factors; δ13C: +2.5‰, δ15N: +4.15‰)[21] ± SD of the potential food sources[21,23,28,31]: rice, C3 vegetables (C3), C4 millets (C4), chicken, pork, Japanese beef (J-Beef), and American beef. Grey foods were rarely eaten in the early modern Japan. Modern and contemporary δ13C values are corrected for the Suess effect[51–54]; namely, 0.4‰, 1.0‰ and 1.6‰ were added to 1930–50s, 1980s and contemporary data, respectively.
Figure 3Relationship between the δ13C (a) and δ15N (b) values of human hairs in Japanese books printed during 1690s–1890s and printing year. Different colours indicate different printing cities (see legend of Fig. 2), which were pooled for the analysis. The horizontal dotted lines on the left of each plot indicate correction ranges based on the estimated elapsed time after publication until printing. Solid and dotted regression lines correspond to data after and before the correction, respectively. The Suess effect on the δ13C values[51–54] is not corrected, because it is estimated less than 0.3‰ (≈ analytical errors) during this period.