| Literature DB >> 30107837 |
José Ignacio Veytia-Bucheli1,2, Juana María Jiménez-Vargas1, Erika Isabel Melchy-Pérez1, Monserrat Alba Sandoval-Hernández1,2, Lourival Domingos Possani3, Yvonne Rosenstein4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In T cells, the Kv1.3 and the KCa3.1 potassium channels regulate the membrane potential and calcium homeostasis. Notably, during TEM cell activation, the number of Kv1.3 channels on the cell membrane dramatically increases. Kv1.3 blockade results in inhibition of Ca2+ signaling in TEM cells, thus eliciting an immunomodulatory effect. Among the naturally occurring peptides, the Vm24 toxin from the Mexican scorpion Vaejovis mexicanus is the most potent and selective Kv1.3 channel blocker known, which makes it a promissory candidate for its use in the clinic. We have shown that addition of Vm24 to TCR-activated human T cells inhibits CD25 expression, cell proliferation and reduces delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in a chronic inflammation model. Here, we used the Vm24 toxin as a tool to investigate the molecular events that follow Kv1.3 blockade specifically on human CD4+ TEM cells as they are actively involved in inflammation and are key mediators of autoimmune diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmune disease; Effector memory T cells; Kv1.3 potassium channel; Proteomics; Vm24 toxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30107837 PMCID: PMC6092819 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-018-0257-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Commun Signal ISSN: 1478-811X Impact factor: 5.712
Fig. 1Kv1.3 channel blockade does not compromise cell viability. Purified CD4+ TEM cells were stained for the (a) CD3, CD4 and (b) CD45RO and CCR7 surface markers. (c) Cell viability was assessed following a 24 h culture period with the Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780. Changes in FSC and positive staining with the viability dye were considered as cell death markers. For death positive control, 30% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to the cells for 30 min. Data from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean). (d) Kv1.3 channels currents were measured by patch clamp in whole cell mode. Currents were evoked by a depolarizing pulse to + 50 mV from a − 120 mV holding potential. The Vm24 toxin was perfused to the cells at a concentration of 1 nM
Fig. 2Kv1.3 channel blockade decreases the expression of CD25 and CD40L, but not that of CD69. CD4+ TEM cells were stimulated through the TCR with plate-bound OKT3 in the presence or absence of Vm24 or ShK (1 nM) toxins. After 24 h of culture, cells were stained for (a) CD25, (c) CD40L and (e) CD69. The histogram of a representative donor for each marker is shown. (b, d, f) Data from 3 to 6 independent experiments are shown as mean ± SEM. The color coding for histograms and bars is maintained. Significance of pairwise comparisons between groups is indicated with stars (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Kv1.3 channel blockade decreases the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. (a) Heat map representation of cytokines levels in CD4+ TEM cells supernatants. Cells were stimulated for 24 h with plate-bound OKT3 in the presence or absence of Vm24 or ShK (1 nM) toxins and supernatants were collected and analyzed with a multiplex assay. All conditions were normalized to the unstimulated (US) control, and the relative abundance (fold change) of each cytokine is indicated by a gradient of color from blue (low abundance) to red (high abundance). The heat map was generated with the data from three independent donors using the Manhattan distance metric and hierarchical clustering based on average linkage. To identify cytokines modified upon TCR engagement, pairwise comparison between the unstimulated and the OKT3-treated group was performed. Proteins that show at least 1.5-fold change and significant difference (p < 0.05) are identified in the heat map with stars (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). (b) Cytokines that showed increased levels following OKT3 stimulation (Fig. 3a) are plotted. Fold change of OKT3, OKT3 + Vm24 and OKT3 + ShK groups normalized to the unstimulated control are shown. The dotted line indicates the protein levels in the supernatants of unstimulated cells. Data from three independent donors are plotted, and significance of pairwise comparisons between the OKT3 and the OKT3 + Vm24 group are indicated with stars (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4Kv1.3 channel blockade modifies the proteome, targeting the protein synthesis machinery. (a) Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomic analysis on CD4+ TEM cells. Cells from three independent donors were stimulated for 24 h with plate-bound OKT3 in the presence or absence of Vm24 (1 nM) and total proteins were analyzed by nano-liquid chromatography coupled to MS/MS. All conditions were normalized to the unstimulated (US) control. Pairwise comparison between the unstimulated and the OKT3-treated group was performed to identify proteins modified upon TCR engagement. Proteins that show at least 1.5-fold change in either direction, and significant difference (p < 0.05) are identified in the upper right and left segments of the volcano plot. Within the OKT3-regulated proteins, a pairwise comparison (p < 0.05) between the OKT3 and the OKT3 + Vm24-treated group was performed to identify proteins (red spots) affected by Kv1.3 channel blockade, in a T cell activation context. Note that these 27 proteins preserved the same trend of change than when cells where stimulated with OKT3 only, yet the amplitude of the change was reduced. (b) Protein–protein interaction network from significantly (p < 0.05) modified proteins affected by Kv1.3 channel blockade in a T cell activation context. The combination of the proteomic data set with the activation markers and the cytokine profile was used to generate a protein physical/functional interaction network and to perform a functional enrichment analysis specific for Biological Process (GO) and KEGG Pathways, using the STRING database. Line thickness on the interaction network indicates the strength of data support. Proteins were clustered and enriched functions are indicated. The expression of (c) IRF4, (d) Hsp90 and (e) CD3e was assessed by flow cytometry to validate proteins identified through the proteomic analysis. Data from three independent individuals are shown as mean ± SEM. Significance of pairwise comparisons between groups is indicated with stars (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Proteins identified in the quantitative proteomic analysis differentially expressed across the dataset
| UniProt KB | Gene | Protein | Fisher’s LSD ( | Fisher’s LSD ( | Fold change OKT3/US | Fold change OKT3 + Vm24/US | Concordance with other proteomic studiesa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q15306 |
| Interferon regulatory factor 4 | 1.4E-06 | 1.53E-04 | 13.04 | 6.71 | 1, 2 |
| Q13283 |
| Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 | 7.5E-06 | 1.72E-05 | 3.90 | 1.31 | 1, 2 |
| Q9Y3F4 |
| Serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein | 8.98E-06 | 8.98E-06 | 13.95 | 1.00 | 1, 2 |
| P14625 |
| Endoplasmin | 5.94E-05 | 2.39E-04 | 2.03 | 1.19 | 1, 2 |
| P08238 |
| Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta | 2.02E-04 | 1.26E-03 | 1.94 | 1.23 | 1, 2 |
| P98179 |
| RNA-binding protein 3 | 1.49E-04 | 3.11E-04 | 2.43 | 1.15 | 1, 2 |
| P35606 |
| Coatomer subunit beta’ | 8.85E-04 | 1.20E-03 | 1.90 | 1.04 | 1, 2 |
| Q92598 |
| Heat shock protein 105 kDa | 5.92E-04 | 2.44E-02 | 4.26 | 2.61 | 1, 2 |
| P53618 |
| Coatomer subunit beta | 5.90E-04 | 1.05E-02 | 3.67 | 2.05 | 1, 2 |
| P11142 |
| Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 8.09E-04 | 4.05E-03 | 1.87 | 1.20 | 1, 2 |
| P31153 |
| S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type-2 | 1.47E-03 | 5.27E-03 | 7.91 | 2.37 | 1, 2 |
| Q2YHR9 |
| HLA class I histocompatibility antigen | 2.08E-03 | 4.51E-03 | 2.23 | 1.16 | 1 |
| P62995 |
| Transformer-2 protein homolog beta | 1.43E-03 | 7.12E-03 | 3.43 | 1.60 | 2 |
| P11021 |
| 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein | 3.24E-03 | 1.32E-02 | 1.62 | 1.14 | 1, 2 |
| O43396 |
| Thioredoxin-like protein 1 | 1.26E-03 | 3.45E-02 | 4.61 | 2.72 | 1, 2 |
| Q14103 |
| Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D0 | 5.12E-03 | 1.60E-02 | 1.67 | 1.14 | 2 |
| Q13435 |
| Splicing factor 3B subunit 2 | 4.02E-03 | 3.16E-02 | 3.30 | 1.80 | 1, 2 |
| Q15436 |
| Protein transport protein Sec23A | 5.22E-03 | 2.28E-02 | 3.64 | 1.69 | 2 |
| Q07666 |
| KH domain-containing, RNA-binding, signal transduction-associated protein 1 | 1E-02 | 8.73E-03 | 2.36 | 0.96 | 2 |
| Q16629 |
| Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7 | 1.28E-02 | 1.56E-02 | 2.99 | 1.08 | 2 |
| P08195 |
| 4F2 cell-surface antigen heavy chain | 9.01E-05 | 1.88E-02 | 9.94 | 6.31 | 1, 2 |
| O94925 |
| Glutaminase kidney isoform, mitochondrial | 1.59E-04 | 4.37E-02 | 6.80 | 4.72 | 2 |
| P23381 |
| Tryptophan--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 8.15E-04 | 4.82E-02 | 5.32 | 3.39 | 1, 2 |
| O60763 |
| General vesicular transport factor p115 | 1.07E-03 | 1.31E-01 | 3.15 | 2.42 | 2 |
| P42224 |
| Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-alpha/beta | 2.48E-03 | 1.26E-01 | 2.98 | 2.20 | 2 |
| P10515 |
| Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, mitochondrial | 1.75E-03 | 9.08E-02 | 5.30 | 3.50 | 2 |
| P23246 |
| Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich | 3.63E-03 | 3.23E-01 | 1.59 | 1.44 | 2 |
| O00571 |
| ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3X | 1.07E-02 | 2.31E-01 | 3.43 | 2.48 | 1, 2 |
| P24534 |
| Elongation factor 1-beta | 4.62E-02 | 1.9E-01 | 1.54 | 1.88 | 1, 2 |
| P17980 |
| 26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6A | 3.69E-02 | 9.95E-01 | 1.74 | 1.73 | 1, 2 |
| P27708 |
| CAD protein | 6.06E-03 | 1.14E-01 | 1.93 | 1.48 | 1, 2 |
| P17987 |
| T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha | 1.98E-02 | 3.51E-01 | 2.58 | 2.04 | 1, 2 |
| Q99613 |
| Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C | 3.55E-03 | 5.77E-02 | 3.33 | 2.06 | 1, 2 |
| Q9UN86 |
| Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 | 9.56E-03 | 1.17E-01 | 3.20 | 2.06 | 1, 2 |
| P67809 |
| Nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 | 1.61E-02 | 7.19E-02 | 2.02 | 1.32 | 1, 2 |
| P26641 |
| Elongation factor 1-gamma | 2.7E-02 | 8E-02 | 1.76 | 1.20 | 1, 2 |
| P34932 |
| Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 | 1.93E-02 | 9.42E-02 | 2.17 | 1.41 | 1, 2 |
| P11940 |
| Polyadenylate-binding protein 1 | 1.15E-05 | 7.50E-02 | 2.92 | 2.51 | 1, 2 |
| P61088 |
| Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 N | 4.75E-02 | 1.82E-03 | 0.50 | 1.48 | – |
| P61247 |
| 40S ribosomal protein S3a | 1.48E-03 | 1.65E-02 | 0.42 | 0.79 | – |
| Q53EL6 |
| Programmed cell death protein 4 | 1.26E-03 | 2.79E-02 | 0.26 | 0.67 | 1, 2 |
| O00160 |
| Unconventional myosin-If | 6.13E-03 | 3.84E-02 | 0.52 | 0.84 | – |
| Q5JSL3 |
| Dedicator of cytokinesis protein 11 | 1.63E-03 | 8.98E-01 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 1 |
| Q92522 |
| Histone H1x | 1.97E-03 | 6.06E-02 | 0.46 | 0.72 | – |
| P07737 |
| Profilin-1 | 3.51E-03 | 5.64E-01 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 1 |
| O43390 |
| Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R | 4.43E-03 | 1.9E-01 | 0.65 | 0.78 | – |
| Q13561 |
| Dynactin subunit 2 | 1.12E-02 | 2.14E-01 | 0.27 | 0.57 | – |
| P16104 |
| Histone H2AX | 4.24E-02 | 9.79E-02 | 0.52 | 0.89 | – |
| O94906 |
| Pre-mRNA-processing factor 6 | 2.05E-02 | 8.37E-02 | 0.41 | 0.82 | – |
| P62906 |
| 60S ribosomal protein L10a | 9.61E-03 | 7.94E-02 | 0.26 | 0.70 | – |
| P07766 |
| T-cell surface glycoprotein CD3 epsilon chain | 2.02E-06 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1 |
| Q9UGI8 |
| Testin | 9.03E-03 | 4.25E-01 | 0.66 | 0.74 | – |
| Q6JBY9 |
| CapZ-interacting protein | 1.86E-02 | 2.26E-01 | 0.20 | 0.56 | 1 |
Proteins with at least 1.5-fold change in either direction that were significantly (p < 0.05) different comparing the unstimulated and the OKT3-stimulated group. Concordance with other T cell activation proteomic studies is indicated. Within the OKT3-regulated proteins, comparison between the OKT3 and the OKT3 + Vm24-treated group is indicated and proteins that showed a statistically significant reduction on the amplitude of the TCR-mediated change as a result of the addition of the Vm24 toxin are indicated in bold
a) Concordance with other proteomic studies:
1Tan H, Yang K, Li Y, Shaw TI, Wang Y, Blanco DB, et al. Integrative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Profiling Reveals Dynamic Signaling Networks and Bioenergetics Pathways Underlying T Cell Activation. Immunity. 2017;46:488–503
2Ron-Harel N, Santos D, Ghergurovich JM, Sage PT, Reddy A, Lovitch SB, et al. Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Proteome Remodeling Promote One-Carbon Metabolism for T Cell Activation. Cell Metab. 2016;24:104–17