Literature DB >> 30107501

Motor and emotional behaviours elicited by electrical stimulation of the human cingulate cortex.

Fausto Caruana1, Marzio Gerbella2, Pietro Avanzini3, Francesca Gozzo4, Veronica Pelliccia1,4, Roberto Mai4, Rouhollah O Abdollahi1, Francesco Cardinale4, Ivana Sartori4, Giorgio Lo Russo4, Giacomo Rizzolatti1,3.   

Abstract

The cingulate cortex is a mosaic of different anatomical fields, whose functional characterization is still a matter of debate. In humans, one method that may provide useful insights on the role of the different cingulate regions, and to tackle the issue of the functional differences between its anterior, middle and posterior subsectors, is intracortical electrical stimulation. While previous reports showed that a variety of integrated behaviours could be elicited by stimulating the midcingulate cortex, little is known about the effects of the electrical stimulation of anterior and posterior cingulate regions. Moreover, the internal arrangement of different behaviours within the midcingulate cortex is still unknown. In the present study, we extended previous stimulation studies by retrospectively analysing all the clinical manifestations induced by intracerebral high frequency electrical stimulation (50 Hz, pulse width: 1 ms, 5 s, current intensity: average intensity of 2.7 ± 0.7 mA, biphasic) of the entire cingulate cortex in a cohort of 329 drug-resistant epileptic patients (1789 stimulation sites) undergoing stereo-electroencephalography for a presurgical evaluation. The large number of patients, on one hand, and the accurate multimodal image-based localization of stereo-electroencephalography electrodes, on the other hand, allowed us to assign specific functional properties to modern anatomical subdivisions of the cingulate cortex. Behavioural or subjective responses were elicited from the 32.3% of all cingulate sites, mainly located in the pregenual and midcingulate regions. We found clear functional differences between the pregenual part of the cingulate cortex, hosting the majority of emotional, interoceptive and autonomic responses, and the anterior midcingulate sector, controlling the majority of all complex motor behaviours. Particularly interesting was the 'actotopic' organization of the anterior midcingulate sector, arranged along the ventro-dorsal axis: (i) whole-body behaviours directed to the extra-personal space, such as getting-up impulses, were elicited ventrally, close to the corpus callosum; (ii) hand actions in the peripersonal space were evoked by the stimulation of the intermediate position; and (iii) body-directed actions were induced by the stimulation of the dorsal branch of the cingulate sulcus. The caudal part of the midcingulate cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex were, in contrast, poorly excitable, and mainly devoted to sensory modalities. In particular, the caudal part of the midcingulate cortex hosted the majority of vestibular responses, while posterior cingulate cortex was the principal recipient of visual effects. We will discuss our data in the light of current controversies on the role of the cingulate cortex in cognition and emotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30107501     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  43 in total

1.  Postural correlates of painful stimuli exposure: impact of mental simulation processes and pain-level of the stimuli.

Authors:  Anaïs Beaumont; Sylvie Granon; Olivier Godefroy; Thierry Lelard; Harold Mouras
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Probing the happy place.

Authors:  Kelly A Mills
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Illusory own body perceptions mapped in the cingulate cortex-An intracranial stimulation study.

Authors:  Irina Popa; Andrei Barborica; Julia Scholly; Cristian Donos; Fabrice Bartolomei; Stanislas Lagarde; Edouard Hirsch; Maria-Paola Valenti-Hirsch; Mihai Dragos Maliia; Anca Adriana Arbune; Andrei Daneasa; Jean Ciurea; Ovidiu-Alexandru Bajenaru; Ioana Mindruta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Electrical brain stimulation of the parietal lobe impairs the perception of verticality.

Authors:  O Kremmyda; V Kirsch; S Bardins; H Lohr; C Vollmar; S Noachtar; M Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex and the Control of Dynamic Behavior in Primates.

Authors:  Ilya E Monosov; Suzanne N Haber; Eric C Leuthardt; Ahmad Jezzini
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Giving a voice to cataplectic experience: recollections from patients with narcolepsy type 1.

Authors:  Christian Franceschini; Chiara Fante; Maria Claudia Folli; Maria Filosa; Fabio Pizza; Elena Antelmi; Francesca Ingravallo; Giuseppe Plazzi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 7.  The tenacious brain: How the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals.

Authors:  Alexandra Touroutoglou; Joseph Andreano; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Intensity of affective experience is modulated by magnitude of intracranial electrical stimulation in human orbitofrontal, cingulate and insular cortices.

Authors:  Jennifer Yih; Danielle E Beam; Kieran C R Fox; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Localized Prediction of Glutamate from Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity of the Pregenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Authors:  Louise Martens; Nils B Kroemer; Vanessa Teckentrup; Lejla Colic; Nicola Palomero-Gallagher; Meng Li; Martin Walter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Clinical Evaluation of Cingulum Bundle Connectivity for Neurosurgical Hypothesis Development.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sweet; Sinem Balta Beylergil; Suraj Thyagaraj; Eric Z Herring; Jesse E Drapekin; Keming Gao; Joseph R Calabrese; Jonathan P Miller; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.