Literature DB >> 30107112

Diatom Microbubbler for Active Biofilm Removal in Confined Spaces.

Yongbeom Seo, Jiayu Leong1, Jun Dong Park, Yu-Tong Hong, Sang-Hyon Chu2, Cheol Park3, Dong Hyun Kim4, Yu-Heng Deng, Vitaliy Dushnov, Joonghui Soh, Simon Rogers, Yi Yan Yang1, Hyunjoon Kong.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms form on and within many living tissues, medical devices, and engineered materials, threatening human health and sustainability. Removing biofilms remains a grand challenge despite tremendous efforts made so far, particularly when they are formed in confined spaces. One primary cause is the limited transport of antibacterial agents into extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of the biofilm. In this study, we hypothesized that a microparticle engineered to be self-locomotive with microbubbles would clean a structure fouled by biofilm by fracturing the EPS and subsequently improving transports of the antiseptic reagent. We examined this hypothesis by doping a hollow cylinder-shaped diatom biosilica with manganese oxide (MnO2) nanosheets. In an antiseptic H2O2 solution, the diatoms doped by MnO2 nanosheets, denoted as diatom bubbler, discharged oxygen gas bubbles continuously and became self-motile. Subsequently, the diatoms infiltrated the bacterial biofilm formed on either flat or microgrooved silicon substrates and continued to generate microbubbles. The resulting microbubbles merged and converted surface energy to mechanical energy high enough to fracture the matrix of biofilm. Consequently, H2O2 molecules diffused into the biofilm and killed most bacterial cells. Overall, this study provides a unique and powerful tool that can significantly impact current efforts to clean a wide array of biofouled products and devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MnO2 nanosheets; biofilm; diatom; microbubble; self-locomotion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30107112      PMCID: PMC8216637          DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b08643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  25 in total

1.  Self-propelled nanotools.

Authors:  Alexander A Solovev; Wang Xi; David H Gracias; Stefan M Harazim; Christoph Deneke; Samuel Sanchez; Oliver G Schmidt
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Noninvasive in vivo optical detection of biofilm in the human middle ear.

Authors:  Cac T Nguyen; Woonggyu Jung; Jeehyun Kim; Eric J Chaney; Michael Novak; Charles N Stewart; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Self-Propelled Nanomotors Autonomously Seek and Repair Cracks.

Authors:  Jinxing Li; Oleg E Shklyaev; Tianlong Li; Wenjuan Liu; Henry Shum; Isaac Rozen; Anna C Balazs; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Patterned biofilm formation reveals a mechanism for structural heterogeneity in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Huan Gu; Shuyu Hou; Chanokpon Yongyat; Suzanne De Tore; Dacheng Ren
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  A bioinspired omniphobic surface coating on medical devices prevents thrombosis and biofouling.

Authors:  Daniel C Leslie; Anna Waterhouse; Julia B Berthet; Thomas M Valentin; Alexander L Watters; Abhishek Jain; Philseok Kim; Benjamin D Hatton; Arthur Nedder; Kathryn Donovan; Elana H Super; Caitlin Howell; Christopher P Johnson; Thy L Vu; Dana E Bolgen; Sami Rifai; Anne R Hansen; Michael Aizenberg; Michael Super; Joanna Aizenberg; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Active Antioxidizing Particles for On-Demand Pressure-Driven Molecular Release.

Authors:  Yongbeom Seo; Jiayu Leong; Jye Yng Teo; Jennifer W Mitchell; Martha U Gillette; Bumsoo Han; Jonghwi Lee; Hyunjoon Kong
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 7.  Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Yan He; Yijin Ren; Aidan Zerdoum; Matthew R Libera; Prashant K Sharma; Arie-Jan van Winkelhoff; Danielle Neut; Paul Stoodley; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 8.  Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections.

Authors:  Hong Wu; Claus Moser; Heng-Zhuang Wang; Niels Høiby; Zhi-Jun Song
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Bacterial attachment and biofilm formation on surfaces are reduced by small-diameter nanoscale pores: how small is small enough?

Authors:  Guoping Feng; Yifan Cheng; Shu-Yi Wang; Diana A Borca-Tasciuc; Randy W Worobo; Carmen I Moraru
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 7.290

10.  Detection and imaging of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm communities by surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering.

Authors:  Gustavo Bodelón; Verónica Montes-García; Vanesa López-Puente; Eric H Hill; Cyrille Hamon; Marta N Sanz-Ortiz; Sergio Rodal-Cedeira; Celina Costas; Sirin Celiksoy; Ignacio Pérez-Juste; Leonardo Scarabelli; Andrea La Porta; Jorge Pérez-Juste; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Luis M Liz-Marzán
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms: Formation, Research Models, Potential Targets, and Methods for Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Yajuan Su; Jaime T Yrastorza; Mitchell Matis; Jenna Cusick; Siwei Zhao; Guangshun Wang; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 17.521

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.