Kuanhou Mou1, Meiling Ding2, Dan Han3, Yan Zhou3, Xin Mu3, Wenli Liu3, Lijuan Wang3. 1. Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710069, P.R. China. 3. Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Abstract
The microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of malignant melanoma (MM) remain unclear. In the present study, miR‑590‑5p was identified to be upregulated in MM cells compared with human melanocytes using a reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction to screen established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs. miR‑590‑5p was demonstrated to inhibit the cell proliferation and tumor growth of MM cells in vitro and in vivo by performing Cell Counting Kit‑8 and tumour xenograft assays, respectively. In addition, flowcytometry assays indicated that miR‑590‑5p induced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at the G1 stage in MM cells. Finally, luciferase assays and western blot analysis results confirmed that the transcriptional regulator Yes‑associated protein 1 (YAP1) is upregulated and inversely associated with miR‑590‑5p expression in MM cells, and is the direct target and functional mediator of miR‑590‑5p in MM. Altogether these results reveal the functional and mechanistic link between miR‑590‑5p and YAP1 in the progression of MM. Therefore, miR‑590‑5p is a potential therapeutic target in MM.
The microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of malignant melanoma (MM) remain unclear. In the present study, miR‑590‑5p was identified to be upregulated in MM cells compared with human melanocytes using a reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction to screen established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs. miR‑590‑5p was demonstrated to inhibit the cell proliferation and tumor growth of MM cells in vitro and in vivo by performing Cell Counting Kit‑8 and tumour xenograft assays, respectively. In addition, flowcytometry assays indicated that miR‑590‑5p induced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at the G1 stage in MM cells. Finally, luciferase assays and western blot analysis results confirmed that the transcriptional regulator Yes‑associated protein 1 (YAP1) is upregulated and inversely associated with miR‑590‑5p expression in MM cells, and is the direct target and functional mediator of miR‑590‑5p in MM. Altogether these results reveal the functional and mechanistic link between miR‑590‑5p and YAP1 in the progression of MM. Therefore, miR‑590‑5p is a potential therapeutic target in MM.
Malignant melanoma (MM) is one of the most aggressive forms of cutaneous neoplasms, and its incidence is notably increasing (1). It is estimated that there will be 87,110 newly diagnosed MM cases and 9,730 MM-associated mortalities in 2017 in the United States (2). Despite substantial improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of MM in previous years, the prognosis remains poor for patients with MM diagnosed at metastatic stages, with a median survival time of 6–9 months and a 5-year survival rate of <15% (3–6). Thus, identifying effective biomarkers for the early detection and efficient evaluation of prognosis of MM following surgery is crucial.MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) comprise a group of small non-coding RNAs (~22 nucleotides in length) (7). These miRNAs regulate the expression of a wide variety of target genes through repressing translation or inducing mRNA degradation by binding to complementary sites in 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTRs) (8). Aberrantly expressing miRNAs may function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes, depending on the functions of their target genes (9–11). Increasingly, miRNAs have been observed in various types of cancer, and have been revealed to be involved in modulating cancer cell behavior, including cell proliferation (12), cell apoptosis (13), cell cycle (14), cell migration (15) and cell invasion (16). Previously, a number of aberrantly-expressed serum and tissue miRNAs have been employed as diagnostic or prognostic indicators in MM (11,17,18).The expression and function of miR-590-5p varies in different types of tumor. miR-590-5p was previously demonstrated to function as an oncogene, and promote the proliferation, migration and G1-S phase transition by directly inhibiting the transforming growth factor beta receptor II (TGF-βRII) in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (19). Conversely, miR-590-5p serves a tumor suppressor role in breast cancer, and inhibits cancer cell stemness and metastasis by targeting SRY-box 2 (20). Previously, it was revealed that miR-590-5p was downregulated in humanmelanomaA375 cells, and inhibited their migration and invasion ability (21). However, the precise functions and underlying mechanisms of miR-590-5p on the proliferation and apoptosis of MM cells remain unclear.In the present study, a reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to detect established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs in MM cells and normal human melanocytes (HMs). Furthermore, Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), flow cytometry and tumor xenograft assays were performed to detect the effects of miR-590-5p on the proliferation and apoptosis of MM cells in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo. Finally, luciferase assays and western blot analysis were performed to investigate whether Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) was the functional mediator of miR-590-5p in MM cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human MM cell lines A2058, A375, normal epidermal melanocytes HEMa-LP and 293 cells were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), where they were characterized by mycoplasma detection, DNA-fingerprinting, isozyme detection and cell vitality detection, performed by the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. A2058 and A375 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. HMs isolated from human foreskin specimens from patients who received circumcision at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University and provided written informed consent for the use of their excised foreskin. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xi'an, China). HM and HEMa-LP cells were cultured in Medium 254 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with HM growth supplement at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.
Oligonucleotide transfection
miR-590-5p negative control (NC; sequence, GUCCAGUGAAUUCCCAG), miR-590-5p inhibitors (sequence, GACGUAAAAUACUUAUUCGAG), miR-590-5p mimics (sequence, GAGCUUAUUCAUAAAAUGCAG), YAP1 NC (antisense, CCGGTAAATTTCTGAAATTTATTTCAAGAGATTTCTAAATCTCATCCTGAGTCTCTCTTTTTG and sense, AATTCAAAAAGACAGGACTTTAGAAATTCTCTTGAAATCCATCAGGAAGAGGACCTGTTTG) and YAP1 small interfering RNA (siRNA; antisense, CCGGCAGGCCTCCTCTTCCTGATGGATTTCAGAGAATCCATCAGGAAGAGGACCTGTTTG and sense, AATTCAAAACAGGTCCTCTTCCTGATGGATTCTCTTGAAATCCATCAGGAAGAGGACCTGTTTTG) were purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). When the confluence of A375 and A2058 cells reached 50–60% in a 6-well plate, oligonucleotides (50 nmol) were mixed with 5 µl Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in 500 µl serum-free DMEM (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The transfection solutions were added to each well containing 500 µl serum-free DMEM (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Once the cells were incubated with oligonucleotides for 24 h, the culture medium was changed to to DMEM (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Following transfection, cell samples were collected at 48 h for further analyses.
RT-qPCR
For miR590-5p quantification, total miRNA was extracted from A375 and A2058 cells using the miRNeasy RNA isolation kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total miRNA samples were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the miScript Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol with a miR-590-5p specific primer and universal small nuclear U6 RNA was used as an internal loading control. RT was performed at 45°C for 60 min and 70°C for 10 min. TaqMan miRNA RT-qPCR (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were used to detect and quantify miR-590-5p and U6 expression. For YAP1 quantification, total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA samples were then reverse-transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol with a YAP1 specific primer and U6 RNA was used as an internal loading control. SYBR Mix (Takara Bio, Inc.) was used to detect and quantify YAP1 and β-actin expression. RT-qPCR assays were performed under the following thermocycling conditions: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. Data were analyzed with 7500 software v.2.0.1 (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), with the automatic Cq setting for adapting the baseline and threshold for Cq determination (22). Each sample was examined in triplicate. The primer sequences used in the present study are listed in Table I.
Table I.
Primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Gene name
Forward primer 5′-3′
Reverse primer 5′-3′
Yes-associated protein 1
ACCCACAGCTCAGCATCTTCG
TGGCTTGTTCCCATCCATCAG
β-actin
CGTCTTCCCCTCCATCGT
GAAGGTGTGGTGCCAGATTT
microRNA-590-5p
GGAATTCTTCAGTTGTAACCCAG
CGGGATCCTTGAGATGTCACCAA
U6
CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
CCK-8
A2058 cells transfected with miR-590-5p NC and miR-590-5p mimics (used 24 h after transfection) and A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p NC and miR-590-5p inhibitors (used 24 h after transfection) were seeded in a 96-well culture plate at a density of 2,000 cells per well. Each group was established in nine wells. CCK-8 reagents (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) were added into each well 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h after seeding, and each group was cultured for 50 min at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The OD values were measured at 490 nm in a Microplate Reader.
Flow cytometry
A375 and A2058 cells in 6 well culture plate were harvested by trypsinization at 37°C for 5 min, and wash three times with PBS. For cell apoptosis, cells were suspended in 500 µl binding buffer at a density of 2×106 cells/ml, and incubated with Annexin V-fluorescien isothiocyanate and propidium iodide (PI; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. For cell cycle analysis, 2×106 cells/ml A2058 and A375 cells were fixed using 75% ethanol at 4°C for 12 h. PI was added into A2058 and A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p NC, inhibitors or mimics and incubated for 20 min in the dark at room temperature. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle was then analyzed using a flow cytometer and Kaluza Analysis Software version 2.0 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
Western blot analysis
A375 and A2058 cells were washed in PBS three times prior to proteins being extracted. Then the cells were lysed using RIPA buffer for 30 min on ice (Xi'an Jing Cai Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Xi'an, China), each protein sample (30 µg) was denatured in SDS sample buffer and separated via 10% SDS/PAGE gel. Separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) for 2 h at room temperature, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4°C. Blotting was performed with primary antibodies against YAP1 (1:300; cat no. 14074; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase-conjugated F(ab)2 fragments (1:5,000; cat no. TA130071; OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) were used as secondary antibodies and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. β-actin (1:4,000; cat no. ab8226; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used as a loading control and incubated overnight at 4°C. Blots were then washed three times (10 min/wash) in tris buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Xi'an Jing Cai Biological Technology Co., Ltd.). ImageJ 1.8.0 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to analyze the gray values of each blot.
Tumour xenograft assays
For tumorigenesis assays, A2058 cells were engineered to stably overexpress miR-590-5p and luciferase, using a lentiviral-based system (cat no. 73153; pLenti6.3; Shanghai GeneChem, Inc., Shanghai, China) In brief, pri-miR-590-5p sequence was cloned into pLenti6.3 vector (Shanghai GeneChem, Inc.). Then, pLenti-miR-590-5p-Luci (50 nmol) was co-transfected into 293 cells with psPAX2 and PMD2G by using Lipofectamine 2000® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Once the 293 cells were incubated with oligonucleotides for 8 h at 37°C, the culture medium was changed to DMEM (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Following transfection, viral particles were collected at 48 h, and centrifuged together at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, then filtered through 0.45 nm filter. Xenograft tumors were generated by the subcutaneous injection of A2058 cells (5×106), including A2058 pLenti-Luciferase and A2058 pLenti-miR-590-5p-Luciferase, into the hind limbs of 4–6 weeks old Balb/C female athymic nude mice (nu/nu; Animal Center of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; n=5 for each group). All mice were housed and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at 18–22°C, with 20% humidity, a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle and ad libitum access to food. The tumor size was measured using an Xenogen IVIS Kinetic imaging system and vernier caliper. Tumor volume was determined by the formula: 0.5×AxB2, where A represents the diameter of the base of the tumor and B represents the corresponding perpendicular value. When the mean diameter reach 1.2 cm or progressive tumor growth was evident, the mice were euthanasized by placing mice in sealed chambers where 5% isoflurane was introduced. Then, the tumors were collected and weighed. All experiments were ethically approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xi'an Jiaotong University and performed in accordance with institutional guidelines (23).
Luciferase assays
A total of 5,000 293 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at 70% confluence. The YAP1 wild type (WT) 3′-UTR firefly luciferase construct (pMir-YAP1 WT- 3′-UTR) was generated by inserting YAP1 WT 3′-UTR into pMir-Report vector (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Mutations were introduced in potential miR-590-5p binding sites using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Then, a final concentration of 100 nM miR-590-5p NC or mimics were transfected into 293 cells along with 30 ng pMir-YAP1 WT or mutant 3′-UTR luciferase reporter and 10 ng Renilla luciferase reporter using Lipofectamine® 2000, as previously stated. Cells were collected 48 h post-transfection, and luciferase assays were performed using a Photinus pyralis-Renilla reniformis dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The ratio of Photinus pyramid to Renilla of each lysate luciferase activity was determined by an Orion II Microplate Illuminometer (Titertek-Berthold, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Relative activities were expressed as the fold change in luciferase activity.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistical software (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A volcano plot of established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNA profiles in A375 cells compared with HM controls was produced, and an adjusted P-value for each miRNA was analyzed by Bonferroni's correction. Potential targets of miR-590-5p were determined by integrating the results of multiple prediction algorithms of TargetScan [TargetScan human 7.2 (24), www.targetscan.org/], PicTar [PicTar (25), https://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/] and miRNAda [miRNAda (26), http://www.microrna.org/; search term used, miR-590-5pmammal) accessed on the 12th December 2016. The differences in characteristics between 2 groups were examined using a paired Student's t-test. The differences in characteristics between 3 groups was examined using one-way analysis of variance followed by a least significant difference-t-test to detect the differences between every 2 groups. The differences of miRNA expressions in A375 and HM cells was examined by hierarchical cluster analysis. All P-values were determined from 2-sided tests. P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.
Results
miR-590-5p is downregulated in MM cells
To identify the miRNAs involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of MM, established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNA screening was detected in normal HMs and the MM cell line A375 by RT-qPCR (Table II). Hierarchical cluster analysis identified that miR-590-5p was commonly downregulated in A375 cells compared with the representative controls (Fig. 1A). A volcano plot revealed a significant difference in the expression of miR-590-5p in A375 cells compared with the controls (>4-fold change; P<0.0001; Fig. 1B). The significant downregulation of miR-590-5p was further confirmed using RT-qPCR in MM cell lines compared with HEMa-LP (P<0.05; Fig. 1C).
Table II.
Established miRNAs detected in the present study.
miRNA name
Function
PMID
miR-590-5p
Tumor suppressor
28433598
miR-663
Oncogene
28765921
miR-33a
Tumor suppressor
28763799
miR-137
Tumor suppressor
28757416
miR-30a
Tumor suppressor
28757413
miR-200c
Tumor suppressor
28727734
miR-378
Tumor suppressor
28725241
miR-7
Tumor suppressor
28693382
miR-215
Tumor suppressor
28693279
miR-195
Tumor suppressor
28693232
miR-30a-5p
Tumor suppressor
28672911
miR-874
Tumor suppressor
28670493
miR-1180
Tumor suppressor
28670370
miR-136
Tumor suppressor
28656883
miR-497
Tumor suppressor
28656286
miR-31
Tumor suppressor
28656284
miR-503
Tumor suppressor
28656281
miR-202
Tumor suppressor
28656198
miR-105-5p
Tumor suppressor
28654905
miR-139-5p
Tumor suppressor
28653604
miR-539
Tumor suppressor
28653599
miR-30d
Tumor suppressor
28651493
miR-493
Tumor suppressor
28651234
miR-491
Tumor suppressor
28648665
miR-337
Tumor suppressor
28641487
miR-26a
Tumor suppressor
28640257
miR-199a-3p
Tumor suppressor
28639901
miR-557
Tumor suppressor
28639890
miR-195
Tumor suppressor
28639885
miR-455-3p
Tumor suppressor
28633632
miR-187
Tumor suppressor
28627639
miR-320
Tumor suppressor
28627594
miR-101
Tumor suppressor
28609840
miR-193a-3p
Tumor suppressor
28600480
miR-4728-3p
Tumor suppressor
28594651
miR-564
Tumor suppressor
28588702
miR-18a
Tumor suppressor
28588697
miR-17-5p
Tumor suppressor
28588663
miR-186
Tumor suppressor
28587405
miR-148a
Tumor suppressor
28586066
miR-497
Tumor suppressor
28586056
miR-1247-5p
Tumor suppressor
28586038
miR-378
Tumor suppressor
28575858
miR-144-3p
Tumor suppressor
28574724
miR-211-5p
Tumor suppressor
28571042
miR-146a-5p
Tumor suppressor
28560455
miR-143-3p
Tumor suppressor
28559978
miR-1271
Tumor suppressor
28551819
miR-186
Tumor suppressor
28550686
miR-193b
Tumor suppressor
28542597
miR-126
Tumor suppressor
28536606
miR-30b-5p
Tumor suppressor
28536082
miR-15a
Oncogene
28758198
miR-483-5p
Oncogene
28727371
miR-210-3p
Oncogene
28693852
miR-193a-3p
Oncogene
28693273
miR-215
Oncogene
28689850
miR-1271
Oncogene
28682437
miR-944
Oncogene
28680805
miR-138
Oncogene
28677784
miR-492
Oncogene
28677719
miR-605
Oncogene
28673012
miR-661
Oncogene
28656235
miR-30e-5p
Oncogene
28653805
miR-137
Oncogene
28610956
miR-96-5p
Oncogene
28588711
miR-216a
Oncogene
28579808
miR-142-5p
Oncogene
28559989
miR-214
Oncogene
28559385
miR-141-3p
Oncogene
28543175
miR-425-5p
Oncogene
28537672
miR-582
Oncogene
28713947
miR-210-3p
Oncogene
28693582
miR-20a
Oncogene
28693582
miR-34a
Oncogene
28599485
miR-146b-5p
Oncogene
28560062
miR-126
Oncogene
28536606
miR-205
Oncogene
28476165
miR-18a-5p
Oncogene
28471447
miR-141
Oncogene
28454307
miR-103
Oncogene
28445396
miR-556-3p
Oncogene
28440444
miR-495
Oncogene
28401017
miR-221
Oncogene
28392366
miR-155
Oncogene
28338193
miR-27a
Oncogene
28327189
miR-181
Oncogene
28224609
miR-844
Oncogene
28224609
miR-182
Oncogene
28122586
miR-125
Oncogene
28053194
miR-346
Oncogene
27913185
miR-19a
Oncogene
27830963
miR/miRNA, microRNA; PMID, PubMed-Indexed for MEDLINE.
Figure 1.
miR-590-5p is downregulated in A375 and A2058 cells. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of all established oncogenic or tumor suppressor miRNAs identified through miRNA screening in A375 cells and normal HM. (B) Volcano plot of established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNA profiles in A375 cells compared with HM controls. The x-axis presents the Log2 FC in miRNA expression between A375 and HM, while the y-axis presents the Log10 of the adjusted P-value for each miRNA. Above the red line on y-axis indicates statistical significance. P<0.05 following Bonferroni's correction. (C) Relative expression of miR-590-5p in normal epidermal melanocytes and MM cells. Data are from three experiments and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. HEMa-LP cells (Student's t-test). miR/miRNA, microRNA; HM, human melanocytes; FC, fold change; MM, malignant meloma.
Effect of miR-590-5p on the proliferation and apoptosis of MM cells
To investigate the functional role of miR-590-5p in MM cells, gain- and loss-of function experiments were performed by transfecting miR-590-5p mimics into A2058 cells and miR-590-5p inhibitors into A375 cells. CCK-8 assays revealed that the proliferation of A2058 cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics was significantly inhibited compared with the normal control (P<0.05; Fig. 2A). Additionally, the proliferation of A375 cells transfected with miR-590p-5p inhibitors was significantly enhanced compared with the normal control (NC) cells (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). Cell apoptosis assays revealed that the percentages of early apoptotic cells significantly increased in A2058 cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics compared with NCs (P<0.05), and decreased in A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p inhibitors compared with NCs (P<0.05; Fig. 2C and D).
Figure 2.
Effects of miR-590-5p on the cell proliferation and apoptosis of MM cells. (A) Effect of miR-590-5p mimics on the proliferation of A2058 cells were detected by CCK-8 assays. (B) Effect of miR-590-5p inhibitors on the proliferation of A375 cells were detected by CCK-8 assays. (C) Effect of miR-590-5p on the cell apoptosis of MM cells were detected by flow cytometry using Annexin V-FITC/PI kit and (D) quantified. Data are from three experiments and presented as mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. respective NC group. (Student's t-test). miR, microRNA; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; NC, normal control; MM, malignant myeloma; FITC, fluorescien isothiocyanate; PI, propdium iodide.
Effects of miR-590-5p on the cell cycle and tumorigenic ability of MM cells
Flow cytometry assays were performed to determine the effects of miR-590-5p on the distribution of cells at the various stages of the cell cycle. Compared to NCs, A2058 cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics displayed a significant increase in the percentage of cells at the G1 stage (P<0.05) and a significant decrease in the percentage of cells at the S stage (P<0.05; Fig. 3A and B). Meanwhile, the proportion of cells at the G1 stage significantly decreased and the proportion of cells at the S stage significantly increased in A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p inhibitors compared with NCs (P<0.05; Fig. 3C).
Figure 3.
Effects of miR-590-5p on cell cycle and tumorigenic ability of malignant myeloma cells. (A) Effect of miR-590-5p on the cell cycle distribution of A2058 and A375 cells were detected using flow cytometry using PI. (B) Effect of miR-590-5p on the cell cycle distribution of A2058 cells. (C) Effect of miR-590-5p on the cell cycle distribution of A375 cells. (D) Tumor sizes were measured by a Xenogene IVIS Kinetic imaging system and vernier caliper every 7 days subsequent to the injection of A2058 pLenti-miR-590-5p-luciferase cells and A2058 pLenti-luciferase cells into the flanks of nude mice. (E) Tumor growth curve of A2058 pLenti-miR-590-5p-luciferase cells and A2058 pLenti-luciferase cells in nude mice. (F) Tumor weight of A2058 pLenti-miR-590-5p-luciferase groups and A2058 pLenti-luciferase groups at day 35. Data are from three experiments and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. respective NC group. (Student's t-test). miR, microRNA; PI, propidium iodide; NC, normal control.
Next, the functional roles of miR-590-5p on the tumorigenic ability of MM cells in vivo were examined. A2058 cells were engineered to stably upregulate miR-590-5p and luciferase expression and performed tumorigenesis assays in nude mice. The cells (5×106) were injected into the flanks of nude mice, and tumor sizes were measured by Xenogen IVIS Kinetic imaging systems and vernier calipers every 7 days. After 35 days, the mice were sacrificed and the tumors were collected and weighed. It was revealed that miR-590-5p exhibited substantial tumor growth-inhibitory effects as assessed by the Xenogen IVIS200 System (Fig. 3D). In addition, a significant reduction of tumor sizes (P<0.05; Fig. 3E) and tumor weight (P<0.05; Fig. 3F) was observed in the pLenti-miR-590-5p group compared with the NC group. Altogether these results indicated miR-590-5p was downregulated in MM cells and could repress cell proliferation and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo.
YAP1 is the direct target of miR-590-5p
To identify the potential targets of miR-590-5p that may contribute to its tumor growth-inhibitory effects, an unbiased computational screening was performed by integrating the results of multiple prediction algorithms (TargetScan, PicTar and miRNAda). YAP1, which contains a putative miR-590-5p target site, was selected as a potential target of miR-590-5p in MM cells. YAP1 WT 3′-UTR and Mut 3′-UTR were cloned separately into a luciferase reporter vector (Fig. 4A). Luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that 293 cells co-transfected with YAP1 WT 3′-UTR and miR-590-5p mimics revealed a >60% significant decrease in the relative luciferase activity compared with NCs (P<0.05). Conversely, 293 cells co-transfected with YAP1 Mut 3′-UTR and miR-590-5p resulted in imperceptible changes in relative luciferase activity compared with the NC (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4.
YAP1 is the direct target of miR-590-5p. (A) miR-590-5p and its putative binding sequence in the 3′-UTR of YAP1, a diagrammatic representation of the luciferase reporter plasmids with WT and MT YAP13′-UTR. (B) Relative luciferase activity in 293 cells following transfection with WT or Mut YAP13′-UTR plasmids co-transfected with miR-590-5p mimics. (C) Relative expression of YAP1 mRNA in normal epidermal melanocytes and MM cells. (D) Relative expression of YAP1 mRNA in MM cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics or inhibitors. (E) Western blot analysis of YAP1 protein in MM cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics or inhibitors. Data are from three experiments and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. respective NC group. (Student's t-test). YAP1, Yes-associated protein 1; WT, wild type; Mut, mutant; UTR, untranslated region; NC, normal control; miR, microRNA; MM, malignant myeloma.
Next. whether YAP1 expression was inversely associated with miR-590-5p in MM cells was examined. It was revealed that YAP1 expression was significantly upregulated in the two MM cell lines used compared with HEMa-LP cells (P<0.05; Fig. 4C). Furthermore, RT-qPCR and western blot results revealed that the mRNA expression levels of YAP1 were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the protein expression of YAP1 decreased in A2058 cells transfected with miR-590-5p mimics compared with NCs. Conversely, the expression of YAP1 at the mRNA expression level was significantly upregulated (P<0.05) and YAP1 protein expression was upregulated in A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p inhibitors (Fig. 4D and E).
YAP1 is a functional mediator of miR-590-5p in MM
To determine whether YAP1 is a functional mediator of miR-590-5p, YAP1 siRNA or NC and miR-590-5p inhibitors were transfected into A375 cells. As expected, silencing the expression of YAP1 in A375 cells transfected with miR-590-5p inhibitors attenuated the effects on cell proliferation (P<0.05; Fig. 5A). In addition, the percentages of early apoptotic cells were increased in A375 cells transfected with YAP1 siRNA and miR-590-5p inhibitors compared with A375 cells transfected with YAP1 NC and miR-590-5p inhibitors (P<0.05; Fig. 5B and C). It was also demonstrated that silencing YAP1 may rescue the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on the cell cycle progression of A375 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 5D and E) in addition to tumor growth (P<0.05; Fig. 5F and G).
Figure 5.
YAP1 was identified as a functional mediator of miR-590-5p in MM. (A) Silencing YAP1 counteracted the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on the cell proliferation of A375 cells. (B) Silencing YAP1 rescues the anti-apoptotic effects of miR590-5p inhibitors in A375 cells. (C) Quantification of (B). (D) Silencing YAP1 is able to rescue the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on cell cycle of A375 cells. (E) Quantification of (D). F, Silencing YAP1 may rescue the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on tumor growth of A375 cells. (G) Silencing YAP1 may rescue the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on tumor weight of A375 cells. Data are from three experiments and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. respective NC group (Student's t-test). YAP1, Yes-associated protein 1; MM, malignant myeloma; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Discussion
In the present study, miR-590-5p was identified to be downregulated in MM cells by screening established oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs and RT-qPCR. It was confirmed that miR-590-5p overexpression is able to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MM cells. It was also identified that miR-590-5p may inhibit MM tumor growth in vivo. Finally, it was demonstrated that YAP1 was upregulated and inversely associated with miR-590-5p expression in MM cells and that YAP1 is the direct target and functional mediator of miR-590-5p in these cells.Dysregulated miRNAs serve notable roles in the regulation of carcinogenesis and the progression of multiple types of cancer (10,27), including MM (11,28,29); however, the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Depending on their different targets, certain miRNAs may function as tumor suppressors, whilst others function as oncogenes. For example, miR-21 is upregulated in primary cutaneous melanomas associated with benign nevi (30,31) and may promote cell invasion by negatively regulating tissue inhibitor of metalloprotinease-3 (32). Alternatively, miR-125b is downregulated in the sera of patients with MM and MM cells compared with healthy volunteers and human epidermal melanocytes, respectively (33–35). In the present study, it was demonstrated that miR-590-5p was downregulated in MM cells. As it was revealed that miR-590-5p inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in MM cells, miR-590-5p may function as a tumor suppressor gene in MM.Previously, it was reported that miR-590-5p was downregulated and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in various cancer types, including colorectal cancer (36,37) and breast cancer (20). Meanwhile, miR-590-5p was demonstrated to be upregulated and function as an oncogene in cervical cancer (38), clear cell renal carcinoma (39) and gastric cancer (40). In hepatocellular carcinoma, there have been conflicting reports concerning the expression and function of miR-590-5p. Shan et al (41) reported that miR-590-5p was downregulated in six hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, inhibited cell growth, induced cell cycle G1 arrest in HepG2 cells by suppressing Wnt family member 5α, c-Myc, and cyclin D1 and increasing the phosphorylation of β-catenin and the expression of caspase-3. On the other hand, Jiang et al (42) demonstrated that miR-590-5p levels were higher in HepG2 cells compared with the normal hepatocellular cell line L-O2, and functioned as an oncogene to promote the tumor proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by directly targeting TGF-βRII. The results of the present study support the tumor suppressor role of miR-590-5p in MM in the following ways: Firstly, miR-590-5p was downregulated in MM cell lines; secondly, miR-590-5p exerted anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo; and third, YAP1-which was identified as an oncogene and upregulated in various types of cancer (43,44)-was confirmed as the direct target and functional mediator of miR-590-5p in MM cells.YAP1 is the key downstream effector of Hippo pathways (45). YAP1 functions as an oncogene and modulates numerous biological phenotypes of cancer cells, including proliferation (46), invasion (47), cell cycle progression (48) and cell differentiation (49). YAP1 was identified to be overexpressed in numerous types of cancer, and is an independent prognostic predictor of cancer (50,51). In MM, YAP1-enhanced tumor progression and metastasis through interacting with the TEA domain transcription factor/TEF, PAR BZIP transcription factor family of transcription factors (52). Furthermore, the high expression of YAP1 was significantly associated with the poor outcome of patients with MM (53). Gene variants of YAP1 also proved to be independently associated with survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma (54). Consistent with these previous studies, the present study revealed that YAP1 was upregulated in MM cells. Furthermore, YAP1 was identified to be the direct target and functional mediator of miR-590-5p in MM cells.It was previously reported miR-590-5p may inhibit the migration and invasion of cancer cells via the suppression of YAP1 expression (21). The focus of this previous study was the effects of miR-590-5p on the migration and invasion of A375 cells. Though it provided preliminarily evidence that the functions of miR-590-5p on the migration and invasion of A375 cells may be mediated by YAP1, this hypothesis was not confirmed through the use of rescue experiments. In the present study, the roles of miR-590-5p on the proliferation of A375 and A2058 cells were investigated in detail. Rescue experiments were also performed to confirm that the effect of miR-590-5p on the proliferation of MM cells was mediated by YAP1. It was revealed that silencing YAP1 is able rescue the effects of miR-590-5p inhibitors on the cell cycle and tumor growth of A375 cells. Therefore, in addition to the results of the previous study, present understanding of the role of YAP1 in the carcinogenesis and progression of MM was furthered.In conclusion, the present study provided evidence that miR-590-5p directly inhibits YAP1 to reduce the proliferation and induce apoptosis of MM cells in vitro and is able to suppress tumor growth in vivo. Enhanced understanding of the process including cell proliferation and apoptosis that are regulated by miR-590-5p, and the identification of critical targets for miR-590-5p including YAP1, provides novel insight into the mechanism of carcinogenesis and progression in MM.
Authors: Jan Strnadel; Sunkyu Choi; Ken Fujimura; Huawei Wang; Wei Zhang; Meghan Wyse; Tracy Wright; Emilie Gross; Carlos Peinado; Hyun Woo Park; Jack Bui; Jonathan Kelber; Michael Bouvet; Kun-Liang Guan; Richard L Klemke Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hyun Jung Lee; Miguel F Diaz; Katherine M Price; Joyce A Ozuna; Songlin Zhang; Eva M Sevick-Muraca; John P Hagan; Pamela L Wenzel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 14.919