Literature DB >> 30105854

Developmental patterns of change in the influence of safe and risky peer choices on risky decision-making.

Barbara R Braams1, Juliet Y Davidow1, Leah H Somerville1.   

Abstract

Adolescents take more risks when peers monitor their behavior. However, it is largely unknown how different types of peer influence affect adolescent decision-making. In this study, we investigate how information about previous choices of peers differentially influences decision-making in adolescence and young adulthood. Participants (N = 99, age range 12-22) completed an economic choice task in which choice options were systematically varied on levels of risk and ambiguity. On each trial, participants selected between a safer choice (low variability in outcome) and a riskier choice (high variability in outcome). Participants made choices in three conditions: a solo condition in which they made choices with no additional information, a social condition in which they saw choices of supposed peers, and a computer condition in which they saw choices of a computer. Results showed that participants' choices conform to the choices made by the peers, but not a computer. Furthermore, when peers chose the safe option, late adolescents were especially likely to make a safe choice. Conversely, when the peer made a risky choice, late adolescents were least likely to follow choices made by the peer. We did not find evidence for differential influence of social information on decisions depending on their level of risk and ambiguity. These results show that information about previous decisions of peers are a powerful modifier for behavior and that the effect of peers on adolescents' decisions is less ubiquitous and more specific than previously assumed.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30105854     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  11 in total

Review 1.  Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for the Development of Incentive-Reward Motivation?

Authors:  Monica Luciana; Paul F Collins
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

2.  Explore with Me: Peer Observation Decreases Risk-Taking but Increases Exploration Tendencies across Adolescence.

Authors:  Corinna Lorenz; Jutta Kray
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework.

Authors:  Simon Ciranka; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-29

4.  Neural processes during adolescent risky decision making are associated with conformity to peer influence.

Authors:  Rui Pei; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Christopher N Cascio; Matthew B O'Donnell; Jean T Shope; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Jean M Vettel; Emily B Falk
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Valuation of peers' safe choices is associated with substance-naïveté in adolescents.

Authors:  Dongil Chung; Mark A Orloff; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Pearl H Chiu; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How to capture developmental brain dynamics: gaps and solutions.

Authors:  Nienke van Atteveldt; Maaike Vandermosten; Wouter Weeda; Milene Bonte
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-05-03

7.  I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice.

Authors:  Madeleine E Moses-Payne; Johanna Habicht; Aislinn Bowler; Nikolaus Steinbeis; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Uncertainty about others' trustworthiness increases during adolescence and guides social information sampling.

Authors:  I Ma; B Westhoff; A C K van Duijvenvoorde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Majority and popularity effects on norm formation in adolescence.

Authors:  Ana da Silva Pinho; Lucas Molleman; Barbara R Braams; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Preference uncertainty accounts for developmental effects on susceptibility to peer influence in adolescence.

Authors:  Andrea M F Reiter; Michael Moutoussis; Lucy Vanes; Rogier Kievit; Edward T Bullmore; Ian M Goodyer; Peter Fonagy; Peter B Jones; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.