| Literature DB >> 30104987 |
Abstract
American adolescents overwhelmingly engage in insufficient physical activity (PA). Attention has turned to the role of affect in shaping PA, raising questions as to whether the impact of affect on PA is direct/automatic or cognitively mediated ("Type 1" or "Type 2" in the dual-process model). This study examines whether intrinsic motivation (IM) mediates the association between affect and PA. Adolescents (N = 142, 48% Male, 20% non-Latino White, mean age = 11.04 years, mean VO2 = 37.19 ml/kg/min, mean BMI = 63.19) completed assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness, affective response to exercise on a stationary cycle, IM, preferred exercise intensity, and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA; ActiGraph). Fitness, exercise intensity and MVPA assessments were repeated 5 months later. Tests for mediation showed that affect predicted PA at baseline and 5 months, and IM mediated the relationship between affect and PA both cross-sectionally (CI = 0.03, 0.17) and longitudinally (CI = 0.04, 0.18). Results suggest a cognitively mediated pathway from affect to behavior. Adolescent PA may be increased either by enhancing IM or by tailoring interventions to accommodate individuals with a predisposition to respond to exercise with negative affect. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (ID # NCT01876602).Entities:
Keywords: affect; dual-process; enjoyment; health promotion; youth
Year: 2018 PMID: 30104987 PMCID: PMC6077231 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Baseline participant characteristics.
| All | Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (cm/kg2) | 20.41 (4.54) | 20.63 (4.67) | 20.08 (4.43) |
| BMI percentile | 63.19 (31.49) | 65.44 (30.74) | 59.91 (32.53) |
| Peak VO2 (L/min)∗∗ | 1.64 (0.31) | 1.73 (0.32) | 1.56 (0.28) |
| Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)∗∗ | 37.19 (7.48) | 38.98 (7.69) | 35.64 (6.89) |
| MVPA (min/day)∗∗∗ | 46.00 (20.10) | 53.13 (22.28) | 39.71 (14.95) |
| Chosen max work rate (Watts)∗ | 33.87 (13.42) | 36.42 (14.32) | 31.38 (12.08) |
| Intrinsic motivation | 5.68 (1.27) | 5.73 (1.37) | 5.63 (1.18) |
| Affective response | 2.73 (1.83) | 2.63 (1.90) | 2.77 (1.87) |
Results of the cross-sectional test for mediation predicting MVPA (N = 142).
| 5000 sample bootstrapping | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | 95% BCa CI | ||||
| Constant | 0.03 (0.32) | 0.09 | 0.92 | ||
| Gender | –0.20 (0.20) | –0.14 | 0.88 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 0.79 (0.32) | 2.43 | 0.01 | ||
| FS | 0.25 (0.05) | 4.60 | 0.0000 | ||
| Constant | 18.40 (4.90) | 3.75 | 0.000 | ||
| Gender | –12.36 (3.09) | –3.99 | 0.000 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 9.05 (5.01) | 1.80 | 0.07 | ||
| FS | 0.60 (0.88) | 0.68 | 0.49 | ||
| IM | 3.81 (1.28) | 2.97 | 0.003 | ||
| Indirect effect | 0.09 (0.03) | [0.038, 0.177] | |||
Results of the prospective test for mediation predicting MVPA 5 months later (N = 134).
| 5000 sample bootstrapping | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 95% BCa CI | ||||
| Constant | –0.02 (0.33) | –0.06 | 0.94 | ||
| Gender | 0.00 (0.21) | 0.03 | 0.97 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 0.78 (0.34) | 2.29 | 0.02 | ||
| VO2 L/min change | 0.54 (0.44) | 1.20 | 0.22 | ||
| FS | 0.26 (0.05) | 4.64 | 0.0000 | ||
| Constant | 26.66 (5.75) | 4.62 | 0.00 | ||
| Gender | –17.64 (3.66) | –4.81 | 0.0000 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 6.19 (6.10) | 1.01 | 0.31 | ||
| VO2 L/min change | 9.56 (7.84) | 1.22 | 0.22 | ||
| FS | 0.01 (1.08) | 0.01 | 0.99 | ||
| IM | 4.39 (1.53) | 2.86 | 0.00 | ||
| Indirect effect | 0.10 (0.03) | [0.041, 0.184] | |||
Results of the cross-sectional test for mediation predicting Work Rate (Watts) (N = 142).
| 5000 sample bootstrapping | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 95% BCa CI | ||||
| Constant | 0.03 (0.32) | 0.09 | 0.92 | ||
| Gender | –0.02 (0.20) | –0.14 | 0.88 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 0.79 (0.32) | 2.43 | 0.01 | ||
| FS | 0.25 (0.05) | 4.60 | 0.0000 | ||
| Constant | 3.16 (3.16) | 0.99 | 0.31 | ||
| Gender | –2.20 (1.99) | –1.10 | 0.27 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 18.36 (3.23) | 5.67 | 0.0000 | ||
| FS | 1.12 (0.56) | 1.97 | 0.05 | ||
| IM | 1.49 (0.82) | 1.79 | 0.07 | ||
| Indirect effect | 0.05 (0.03) | [0.000, 0.143] | |||
Results of the prospective test for mediation predicting Work Rate (Watts) 5 months later (N = 134).
| 5000 sample bootstrapping | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 95% BCa CI | ||||
| Constant | –0.02 (0.33) | –0.06 | 0.94 | ||
| Gender | 0.00 (0.21) | 0.03 | 0.97 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 0.78 (0.34) | 2.29 | 0.02 | ||
| VO2 L/min change | 0.54 (0.44) | 1.20 | 0.22 | ||
| FS | 0.26 (0.05) | 4.64 | 0.0000 | ||
| Constant | 4.95 (3.30) | 1.49 | 0.13 | ||
| Gender | –3.40 (2.10) | –1.62 | 0.10 | ||
| VO2 L/min | 13.27 (3.50) | 3.78 | 0.0002 | ||
| VO2 L/min change | 9.30 (4.50) | 2.06 | 0.04 | ||
| FS | 0.80 (0.62) | 1.29 | 0.19 | ||
| IM | 1.85 (0.88) | 2.10 | 0.03 | ||
| Indirect effect | 0.07 (0.04) | [0.008, 0.173] | |||