| Literature DB >> 30104553 |
Daniel Castellano-Castillo1,2, Isabel Moreno-Indias3,4, Jose Carlos Fernandez-Garcia5,6, Mercedes Clemente-Postigo7,8, Manuel Castro-Cabezas9, Francisco José Tinahones10,11, María Isabel Queipo-Ortuño12,13, Fernando Cardona14,15.
Abstract
Epigenetic marks, and especially DNA methylation, are becoming an important factor in obesity, which could help to explain its etiology and associated comorbidities. Adipose tissue, now considered as an important endocrine organ, produces complement system factors. Complement component 3 (C3) turns out to be an important protein in metabolic disorders, via either inflammation or the C3 subproduct acylation stimulating protein (ASP) which directly stimulates lipid storage. In this study, we analyze C3 DNA methylation in adipose tissue from subjects with a different grade of obesity. Adipose tissue samples were collected from subjects with a different degree of obesity determined by their body mass index (BMI) as: Overweight subjects (BMI ≥ 25 and <30), obese class 1/2 subjects (BMI ≥ 30 and <40) and obese class 3 subjects (BMI ≥ 40). C3 DNA methylation was measured for 7 CpGs by pyrosequencition using the Pyromark technology (Qiagen, Madrid Spain). C3 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were analyzed by pre-designed Taqman assays (Applied biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and ASP/C3a was measured using a ELISA kit. The data were analyzed using the statistic package SPSS. C3 DNA methylation levels were lower in the morbid obese group. Accordingly, C3 methylation correlated negatively with BMI and leptin. However, C3 mRNA levels were more associated with insulin resistance, and positive correlations with insulin, glucose and homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) existed. ASP correlated negatively with high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. C3 methylation levels were associated to adiposity variables, such as BMI and leptin, while the C3 mRNA levels were associated to glucose metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: ASP; C3; DNA methylation; complement factor; insulin resistance; obesity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30104553 PMCID: PMC6116013 DOI: 10.3390/genes9080410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Biochemical and anthropometric variables for each study group.
| Overweight ( | Class 1/2 ( | Class 3 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 55.70 ± 11.71 a | 56.70 ± 15.24 a | 41.53 ± 9.78 b |
| Gender (men/women) | 10/13 | 7/13 | 6/11 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.41 ± 1.29 a | 33.23 ± 2.76 b | 49.78 ± 6.49 c |
| Waist (cm) | 93.96 ± 5.48 a | 106.75 ± 9.23 b | 133.69 ± 17.77 c |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 6.12 ± 1.20 | 5.99 ± 1.47 | 5.79 ± 1.15 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.318 ± 0.98 a | 3.124 ± 1.59 a | 5.30 ± 4.91 b |
| Tg (mmol/L) | 1.42 ± 0.60 | 1.47 ± 0.54 | 1.37 ± 0.50 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.58 ± 1.00 a | 5.48 ± 1.28 a | 4.67 ± 0.94 b |
| HDL-cho (mmol/L) | 1.37 ± 0.34 a,b | 1.49 ± 0.32 a | 1.26 ± 0.32 b |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.43 ± 22.37 | 135.65 ± 24.83 | 136.07 ± 19.39 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.52 ± 12.62 | 79.75 ± 12.78 | 83.79 ± 10.03 |
| ApoA1 (mmol/L) | 1.73 ± 0.20 | 1.81 ± 0.27 | 1.58 ± 0.15 |
| ApB (mmol/L) | 1.10 ± 0.27 | 1.01 ± 0.21 | 0.89 ± 0.28 |
| GOT (µkat/L) | 0.25 ± 0.12 a | 0.34 ± 0.18 a,b | 0.39 ± 0.16 b |
| GPT (µkat/L) | 0.59 ± 0.24 | 0.75 ± 0.37 | 0.75 ± 0.32 |
| GGT (µkat/L) | 0.63 ± 0.50 | 0.61 ± 0.29 | 0.55 ± 0.38 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 14.31 ± 7.13 a | 21.83 ± 11.12 a | 68.21 ± 30.09 b |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 9.21 ± 3.92 | 10.49 ± 4.64 | 6.90 ± 3.83 |
Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); Triglycerides (Tg); High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-cho); Systolic blood pressure (SBP); Diastolic blood pressure (DBP); Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1); Apolipoprotein B (ApoB); Glutamil oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT); glutamate pyruvic transaminase (GPT); Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT). Different letters mean significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Figure shows the adipose tissue C3 DNA methylation levels (A), adipose tissue C3 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels (B) and serum levels of acylation stimulating protein (ASP) (C) among the study groups: OW (overweight subjects; Body mass index (BMI) = 25–29.9 Kg/m2), Class 1/2 (class 1/2 obese subjects; BMI = 30–39.9 Kg/m2) and Class 3 (class 3 obese subjects; BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m2). Values are presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis using Duncan and Tukey test was used to test differences among the groups. Different letters mean significant differences among the groups when p < 0.05.
Correlations between C3 DNA methylation, C3 mRNA and serum ASP with anthropometric and biochemical variables.
| ASP | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.076 | 0.226 | 0.035 |
| BMI | 0.177 | −0.411 ** | −0.04 |
| Waist | 0.192 | −0.26 | 0.062 |
| Insulin | 0.364 ** | −0.079 | 0.157 |
| Glucose | 0.324 * | 0.09 | −0.102 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.417 ** | −0.079 | 0.124 |
| HDL-cho | 0.073 | −0.176 | −0.370 ** |
| Leptin | 0.289 | −0.528 ** | −0.077 |
| Adiponectin | −0.316 * | 0.005 | −0.071 |
* and ** Indicates differences between the groups (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 respectively).
Multiple regression analysis. Model A with BMI as dependent variable and model B with HOMA-IR as dependent variable. Model A was age-, gender-, HOMA-IR-, C3 mRNA- and C3 methylation-adjusted. Model B was age-, gender-, BMI-, C3 mRNA- and C3 methylation-adjusted.
|
|
| ||
| β |
| CI (95%) | |
| Age | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.43–(−0.13) |
| Gender | 0.48 | 0.81 | −3.76–4.73 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.38–1.87 |
| 0.34 | 0.65 | −1.17–1.86 | |
| −0.79 | 0.00 | −1.35–(−0.23) | |
|
|
| ||
| β |
| CI (95%) | |
| Age | −0.00 | 0.96 | −0.06–0.05 |
| Gender | −0.71 | 0.32 | −2.14–0.72 |
| BMI | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.04–0.21 |
| 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.26–1.22 | |
| 0.07 | 0.44 | −0.12–0.28 | |
CI: Confidence Interval.