Literature DB >> 30104337

Influence of vmPFC on dmPFC Predicts Valence-Guided Belief Formation.

Bojana Kuzmanovic1, Lionel Rigoux2,3, Marc Tittgemeyer2.   

Abstract

When updating beliefs about their future prospects, people tend to disregard bad news. By combining fMRI with computational and dynamic causal modeling, we identified neurocircuitry mechanisms underlying this optimism bias to test for valence-guided belief formation. In each trial of the fMRI task, participants (n = 24, 10 male) estimated the base rate (eBR) and their risks of experiencing negative future events, were confronted with the actual BR, and finally had the opportunity to update their initial self-related risk estimate. We demonstrated an optimism bias by revealing greater belief updates in response to good over bad news (i.e., learning that the actual BR is lower or higher than expected) while controlling for confounds (estimation error and personal relevance of the new information). Updating was favorable when the final belief about risks improved (or at least did not worsen) relative to the initial risk estimate. This valence of updating was encoded by the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) associated with the valuation of rewards. Within the updating circuit, the vmPFC filtered the incoming signal in a valence-dependent manner and influenced the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Both the valence-encoding activity in the vmPFC and its influence on the dmPFC predicted individual magnitudes of the optimism bias. Our results indicate that updating was biased by the motivation to maximize desirable beliefs, mediated by the influence of the valuation system on further cognitive processing. Therefore, although it provides the very basis for human reasoning, belief formation is essentially distorted to promote desired conclusions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The question of whether human reasoning is biased by desires and goals is crucial for everyday social, professional, and economic decisions. How much our belief formation is influenced by what we want to believe is, however, still debated. Our study confirms that belief updates are indeed optimistically biased. Critically, the bias depends on the recruitment of the brain valuation system and the influence of this system on neural regions involved in reasoning. These neurocircuit interactions support the notion that the motivation to maximize pleasant beliefs reinforces those cognitive processes that are most likely to yield the desired conclusion.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387996-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCM; belief update; computational modeling; optimism bias; value; vmPFC

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104337      PMCID: PMC6596151          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0266-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

Review 1.  The neuroscience of motivated cognition.

Authors:  Brent L Hughes; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  How the brain translates money into force: a neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation.

Authors:  Mathias Pessiglione; Liane Schmidt; Bogdan Draganski; Raffael Kalisch; Hakwan Lau; Ray J Dolan; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice.

Authors:  Dino J Levy; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Ventromedial frontal lobe damage disrupts value maximization in humans.

Authors:  Nathalie Camille; Cathryn A Griffiths; Khoi Vo; Lesley K Fellows; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Implicit self-esteem compensation: automatic threat defense.

Authors:  Laurie A Rudman; Matthew C Dohn; Kimberly Fairchild
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-11

6.  Evaluation of slice accelerations using multiband echo planar imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  Junqian Xu; Steen Moeller; Edward J Auerbach; John Strupp; Stephen M Smith; David A Feinberg; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Christoph W Korn; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Valence-Dependent Belief Updating: Computational Validation.

Authors:  Bojana Kuzmanovic; Lionel Rigoux
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-29

9.  Optimistic update bias holds firm: Three tests of robustness following Shah et al.

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Tali Sharot
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-11-09

10.  Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events.

Authors:  C W Korn; T Sharot; H Walter; H R Heekeren; R J Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  9 in total

1.  Atlas-Based Classification Algorithms for Identification of Informative Brain Regions in fMRI Data.

Authors:  Juan E Arco; Paloma Díaz-Gutiérrez; Javier Ramírez; María Ruz
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-04

2.  Evaluation of Early Ketamine Effects on Belief-Updating Biases in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Hugo Bottemanne; Orphee Morlaas; Anne Claret; Tali Sharot; Philippe Fossati; Liane Schmidt
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 25.911

3.  A Precuneal Causal Loop Mediates External and Internal Information Integration in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Dian Lyu; Ioannis Pappas; David K Menon; Emmanuel A Stamatakis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Pandora's box.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJPsych Int       Date:  2018-11

5.  Social optimism biases are associated with cortical thickness.

Authors:  Dominik Andreas Moser; Mihai Dricu; Roland Wiest; Laurent Schüpbach; Tatjana Aue
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Prefrontal contributions to the stability and variability of thought and conscious experience.

Authors:  Andre Zamani; Robin Carhart-Harris; Kalina Christoff
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Insula network connectivity mediates the association between childhood maltreatment and depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder patients.

Authors:  Cancan He; Dandan Fan; Xinyi Liu; Qing Wang; Haisan Zhang; Hongxing Zhang; Zhijun Zhang; Chunming Xie
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Neural mechanisms associated with semantic and basic self-oriented memory processes interact moderating self-esteem.

Authors:  Rachel C Amey; Jordan B Leitner; Mengting Liu; Chad E Forbes
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-01-19

9.  Neural representations of the amount and the delay time of reward in intertemporal decision making.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yajie Wang; Pinchun Wang; Maomiao Peng; Manman Zhang; Yuxuan Zhu; Shiyu Wei; Chuansheng Chen; Xiongying Chen; Shan Luo; Xuejun Bai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.