| Literature DB >> 30103406 |
Malgorzata Zimniewska1, Wanda Rozańska2, Agnieszka Gryszczynska3, Barbara Romanowska4, Anna Kicinska-Jakubowska5.
Abstract
Flax and hemp fibers are known as textile raw materials with pro-health properties. This paper presents results of research aimed at investigating the antioxidant activity of the fibers in order to explain a mechanism for the favorable influence of textiles made of these fibers when in contact with human skin. The study presents a new approach in evaluation of textile fibers in terms of their inherent pro-health properties. Antioxidant properties of flax and hemp fibers were tested with the use of FRAP and DPPH methods. The content of phenolic acids: syringic, sinapinic, p-coumaric and ferulic acid was determined with the use of HPLC. The results proved that the antioxidant activity of the tested fibers depends on a type and variety of fibrous plants, a method of fiber extraction and subsequent stages of preliminary processing of the fibers. Both decorticated flax and hemp fibers showed higher antioxidant activity in comparison to the fibers obtained with other extraction methods, while decorticated flax of different varieties presented the highest value of the FRAP. Wet methods of fiber extraction and processing caused reduction of phenolic acids content and significantly lower values of the FRAP and DPPH.Entities:
Keywords: ATR-FTIR; HPLC; antioxidant activity; chemical analysis; flax; hemp; phenolic acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30103406 PMCID: PMC6222420 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23081993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Chemical composition of: water retted hemp fibers of Beniko, Wojko, Tygra and Białobrzeskie variety; hemp fiber of Białobrzeskie variety after dew retting, decortication, osmotically degumming and water retting and flax fibers of Modran, Nike and B14 IUNG variety after technological processes. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukay’s HSD test.
| Degumming Method | Variety | Content of: | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waxes and Fats | Pectin | Lignin | Cellulose | Hemicellulose | |||||||
| % | ±SD | % | ±SD | % | ±SD | % | ±SD | % | ±SD | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Water retting | Beniko | 0.23 a | 0.01 | 1.47 | 0.09 | 2.81 a | 0.29 | 71.31 a | 1.32 | 15.03 a | 0.02 |
| Wojko | 0.24 a | 0.04 | 0.67 a | 0.02 | 3.02 a | 0.31 | 72.53 a | 0.11 | 16.67 | 0.24 | |
| Tygra | 0.25 a | 0.04 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 2.78 a | 0.28 | 70.79 a | 0.13 | 15.00 a | 0.28 | |
| Białobrzeskie | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 2.38 a | 0.22 | 72.03 a | 0.22 | 14.37 | 0.29 | |
| Decortication | 0.47 a,b | 0.02 | 2.00 | 0.09 | 5.55 | 0.17 | 66.02 a | 0.46 | 21.25 | 0.05 | |
| Dew retting | 0.56 a | 0.14 | 3.68 | 0.19 | 4.31 a | 0.04 | 66.16 a | 0.48 | 21.72 | 0.12 | |
| Water retting | Białobrzeskie | 0.34 b | 0.02 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 2.38 | 0.22 | 72.03 | 0.22 | 14.37 | 0.29 |
| Osmotic degumming | 0.44 a,b | 0.04 | 2.82 | 0.22 | 4.03 a | 0.09 | 67.81 | 0.52 | 16.29 | 0.03 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Decortication | 1.26 | 0.00 | 4.62 a | 0.16 | 4.00 a | 0.16 | 68.89 | 1.91 | 29.35 | 0.16 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | Modran | 0.69 | 0.07 | 4.41 a | 0.50 | 4.20 a | 0.16 | 75.54 a | 1.18 | 19.62 | 0.15 |
| Cottonization | 0.97 | 0.10 | 4.72 a | 0.39 | 4.26 a | 0.15 | 73.51 a | 0.98 | 16.44 | 0.23 | |
| Decortication | 1.47 | 0.07 | 4.11 | 0.38 | 8.60 | 0.30 | 64.57 | 0.85 | 29.38 | 0.08 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | NIKE | 0.76 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 0.27 | 4.46 a | 0.48 | 77.44 | 1.58 | 16.43 | 0.25 |
| Cottonization | 0.95 | 0.05 | 2.39 | 0.22 | 4.87 a | 0.51 | 74.25 | 0.20 | 13.84 | 0.06 | |
| Decortication | 1.47 a | 0.07 | 4.11 | 0.38 | 8.60 | 0.30 | 64.57 | 0.85 | 29.38 | 0.08 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | B14 IUNG | 1.33 a | 0.01 | 5.43 | 0.28 | 6.69 a | 0.48 | 75.04 | 0.46 | 23.92 | 0.02 |
| Cottonization | 1.72 | 0.09 | 3.57 | 0.23 | 6.10 a | 0.01 | 72.20 | 0.47 | 20.41 | 0.09 | |
a,b—represent the groups for which the mean values do not differ statistically at the assumed significance level. The mean values labelled with the same letter (a or b) do not differ statistically at (α = 0.05).
Acid content in the flax and hemp fiber. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), n = 4. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukay’s HSD test.
| Degumming Method | Variety | Content of Acids: | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syringic | Sinapinic | Ferulic | |||||||
| Result | ±SD | Result | ±SD | Result | ±SD | Result | ±SD | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Water retting | Beniko | 0.031 a | 0.001 | -* a | - | 0.722 a,b | 0.019 | -* a | - |
| Wojko | 0.046 | 0.001 | 0.048 | 0.002 | 0.741 a | 0.006 | 0.027 a | 0.001 | |
| Tygra | 0.036 | 0.001 | 0.100 | 0.003 | 0.695 b | 0.034 | 0.572 | 0.031 | |
| Białobrzeskie | 0.033 a | 0.001 | -* a | - | 0.024 | 0.006 | -* a | - | |
| Decortication | 0.224 | 0.011 | 0.672 | 0.023 | 0.746 | 0.008 | 2.082 | 0.036 | |
| Dew retting | 0.079 | 0.003 | -* a | - | 0.717 | 0.008 | 0.039 a | 0.004 | |
| Water retting | Białobrzeskie | 0.033 | 0.001 | -* a | - | 0.024 | 0.006 | -* a | - |
| Osmotic degumming | 0.094 | 0.003 | -* a | - | 1.111 | 0.011 | 0.625 | 0.009 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Decortication | 0.235 | 0.008 | -* a | - | 0.995 | 0.024 | 5.749 | 0.159 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | Modran | -* | - | -* a | - | -* a | - | 0.041 | 0.002 |
| Cottonization | 0.035 | 0.002 | -* a | - | -* a | - | 1.206 | 0.053 | |
| Decortication | -* a | - | -* a | - | -* a | - | 1.485 | 0.034 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | NIKE | -* a | - | -* | - | -* a | - | 0.054 | 0.001 |
| Cottonization | -* a | - | -* a | - | -* a | - | 1.035 | 0.020 | |
| Decortication | 0.125 | 0.060 | -* a | - | 0.904 | 0.009 | 3.146 | 0.106 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | B14 IUNG | 0.052 a | 0.002 | -* a | - | 0.027 | 0.008 | 2.525 | 0.106 |
| Cottonization | 0.040 a | 0.001 | -* a | - | 0.756 | 0.034 | 1.736 | 0.045 | |
-* not identified; a,b—represent the groups for which the mean values do not differ statistically at the assumed significance level. The mean values labelled with the same letter (a or b) do not differ statistically at (α = 0.05).
The antioxidative activity of different varieties of bast fibers depending on the extraction method. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), n = 3. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukay’s HSD test.
| Degumming Method | Variety | FRAP [μmol/L] | Inhibition of DPPH [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | ±SD | Result | ±SD | ||
|
| |||||
| Water retting | Beniko | 140.34 | 4.75 | 11.30 a | 0.92 |
| Wojko | 156.75 | 2.31 | 10.04 a | 0.49 | |
| Tygra | 165.76 | 1.62 | 32.55 | 0.32 | |
| Białobrzeskie | 76.62 | 1.33 | 3.09 | 0.18 | |
| Decortication | 230.22 | 1.55 | 18.03 | 0.63 | |
| Dew retting | 124.09 | 1.93 | 5.31 | 0.25 | |
| Water retting | Białobrzeskie | 76.62 | 1.33 | 3.09 a | 0.18 |
| Osmotic degumming | 93.71 | 0.69 | 3.94 a | 0.19 | |
|
| |||||
| Decortication | 523.00 | 2.08 | 33.85 | 0.17 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | Modran | 129.45 | 1.28 | 5.80 | 0.14 |
| Cottonization | 70.69 | 2.31 | 3.29 | 0.24 | |
| Decortication | 519.75 | 2.69 | 29.76 | 0.15 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | NIKE | 140.79 | 1.16 | 7.64 | 0.16 |
| Cottonization | 78.84 | 1.59 | 5.10 | 0.36 | |
| Decortication | 485.84 | 2.11 | 37.71 | 0.14 | |
| Wet degumming + ultrasound | B14 Iung | 195.79 | 2.23 | 11.05 | 0.11 |
| Cottonization | 119.42 | 4.55 | 6.82 | 0.23 | |
a—represent the group for which the mean values do not differ statistically at the assumed significance level. The mean values labelled with the same letter (a) do not differ statistically at (α = 0.05).
The values of the Pearson correlation determined for all the varieties of the tested fibers, relationship between the content of ferulic/p-coumaric/syringic/sinapinic acids and lignin content/FRAP/inhibition of DPPH.
| Tested Parameters | Values of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content of Ferulic Acid | Content of | Content of Syringic Acid | Content of Sinapinic Acid | |
| Hemp variety | ||||
| Lignin content | 0.11 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 0.43 |
| FRAP | 0.54 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.72 |
| DPPH | 0.96 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
| Method extraction of hemp | ||||
| Lignin content | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.76 |
| FRAP | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| DPPH | 0.94 | 0.21 | 0.97 | 0.99 |
| Variety of flax—MODRAN | ||||
| Lignin content | −0.91 | −0.98 | −0.94 | Not identified |
| FRAP | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.97 | Not identified |
| DPPH | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.98 | Not identified |
| Variety of flax—NIKE | ||||
| Lignin content | 0.80 | Not identified | Not identified | Not identified |
| FRAP | 0.65 | Not identified | Not identified | Not identified |
| DPPH | 0.68 | Not identified | Not identified | Not identified |
| Variety of flax—B14 IUNG | ||||
| Lignin content | −0.53 | −0.89 | −0.85 | Not identified |
| FRAP | 0.92 | 0.46 | 1.00 | Not identified |
| DPPH | 0.89 | 0.53 | 1.00 | Not identified |
Figure 1Method extraction of hemp—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of ferulic acid [mg/100 g] (y = 87.057 + 64.243x; C = 95%).
Figure 2Method extraction of hemp—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of syringic acid [mg/100 g] (y = 43.999 + 810.796x; C = 95%).
Figure 3Method extraction of hemp—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of sinapinic acid [mg/100 g] (y = 98.140 + 195.548x; C = 95%).
Figure 4Variety of flax MODRAN—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of ferulic acid [mg/100 g] (y = 60.187 + 77.556x; C = 95%).
Figure 5Variety of flax MODRAN—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of p-coumaric acid [mg/100 g] (y = 100.070 + 425.055x; C = 95%).
Figure 6Variety of flax MODRAN—Dependence of FRAP [μmol/L] vs. content of syringic acid [mg/100 g] (y = 72.254 + 1875.476x; C = 95%).
Figure 7The Fourier transform infrared Attenuated Total Reflection spectra of the flax fibers of Modran, Nike and B14 IUNG variety after technological processes.
Figure 8The Fourier transform infrared Attenuated Total Reflection spectra of the hemp fibers of Beniko, Wojko, Tygra and Białobrzeskie variety after warm water retting.
Figure 9The Fourier transform infrared Attenuated Total Reflection spectra of the Białobrzeskie variety, hemp fiber after decortication, dew retting, water retting and osmotically degumming.
The characteristics of the main absorbance spectra in FTIR of flax fiber.
| Bond | Vibration Type | Wavenumber [cm−1] | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-H | Stretching | 3100–3600 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin |
| C-H3 | Stretching | 2954–2970 | Lignin |
| C-H, C-H2 | Stretching | 2915–2923; 2895–2897; 2841–2848 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectins, waxes and fats |
| C=O | Stretching | 1730–1736 | Carboxylic acids, aldehydes, esters (pectin, lignin, waxes and fats) |
| O-H | Stretching | 1615–1645 | Adsorbed water |
| C=C Aromatic | Symmetrical Stretching | 1593–1595; 1507–1508 | Peaks characteristic of lignin |
| O-H | Bending | 1461–1463 | Adsorbed water |
| COO | Stretching | 1418–1420; 1424–1426 | Acids (pectins) |
| C-H3 | Symmetrical Deformation | 1370–1373 | Lignin |
| O-H | Bending | 1332–1338 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin |
| CH2 | Scissoring (bending) | 1312–1314 | Cellulose, hemicellulose |
| C-H | Bending | 1271–1278 | Peak characteristic for lignin |
| C-O | Stretching | 1244–1246 | Hemicellulose, pectins |
| C-H | Bending | 1201–1204 | Flax, hemp |
| C-O-C | Bending | 1156–1161; 1051; 1020–1028 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin |
| C-O | Stretching | 910–1125 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin |
| Β-Glycosidic bond | Stretching | 893–897 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin |