Literature DB >> 30103226

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis techniques for the treatment of patients with acute appendicitis.

Li-Ping Ye1, Xin-Li Mao1, Hai Yang2, Bi-Li He1, Lin-Hong Zhu3, Yu Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) in treating patients with acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2014, 22 patients with acute appendicitis underwent ERAT. Patient demographics, colonoscopy findings, endoscopic retrograde appendiceal radiography (ERAR) findings, and treatment outcomes of the ERAT and adverse events associated with ERAT were analyzed.
RESULTS: In this study, 22 patients with acute appendicitis underwent ERAT. The median age of the patients was 39.5 years. Colonoscopy findings included mucosal hyperemia and swelling of the appendiceal orifice and/or its surrounding mucosa (86.4 %, 19/22) and pus at the appendiceal orifice (40.9 %, 9/22). ERAR findings included irregular contour (76.2 %, 16/21), appendiceal lumen dilation (28.6 %, 6/21), appendiceal lumen stenosis (42.9 %, 9/21), and filling defect of the appendiceal lumen (23.8 %, 5/21). Deep intubation was successfully performed in 21 of the 22 patients (95.5 %). Sixteen patients underwent endoscopic appendiceal stent placement after endoscopic appendiceal irrigation (EAI) due to lumen stenosis of the appendiceal, excessive pus, or appendiceal fecalith, and the remaining 6 patients only underwent EAI. Among the 22 patients who underwent ERAT, their abdominal pain was noticeably relieved following the procedure. The main adverse events associated with ERAT were spontaneous discharge of the stent, recurrent abdominal pain, and recurrent appendicitis. During the follow-up (median 33 months), 2 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: ERAT provide a new alternative therapeutic method for patients with acute appendicitis, particularly for certain patients who are unwilling to undergo an appendectomy. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30103226     DOI: 10.1055/a-0581-9119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  5 in total

1.  Prophylactic appendiceal retrograde intraluminal stent placement (PARIS).

Authors:  Margaret G Keane; Shruti Mony; Laura D Wood; Vivek Kumbhari; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-10-14

2.  Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Banreet Dhindsa; Yassin Naga; Alexander Praus; Syed Mohsin Saghir; Harmeet Mashiana; Daryl Ramai; Saurabh Chandan; Harlan Sayles; Amaninder Dhaliwal; Ishfaq Bhat; Shailender Singh; Douglas Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Peilong Sun; Miao Jiang; Zhemin Shen; Zili Zhen; Jingtian Liu; Mu Ye; Weida Huang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Baohong Yang; Lingjian Kong; Saif Ullah; Lixia Zhao; Dan Liu; Deliang Li; Xuezhong Shi; Xiaocan Jia; Paras Dalal; Bingrong Liu
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 5.  Clinical Management of Appendicitis.

Authors:  Peter Becker; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Dieter Schilling
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.