Literature DB >> 30103198

Comparison of the state of Lithium-Sulphur and lithium-ion batteries applied to electromobility.

G Benveniste1, H Rallo2, L Canals Casals3, A Merino4, B Amante5.   

Abstract

The market share in electric vehicles (EV) is increasing. This trend is likely to continue due to the increased interest in reducing CO2 emissions. The electric vehicle market evolution depends principally on the evolution of batteries capacity. As a consequence, automobile manufacturers focus their efforts on launching in the market EVs capable to compete with internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) in both performance and economic aspects. Although EVs are suitable for the day-to-day needs of the typical urban driver, their range is still lower than ICEV, because batteries are not able to store and supply enough energy to the vehicle and provide the same autonomy as ICEV. EV use mostly Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries but this technology is reaching its theoretical limit (200-250 Wh/kg). Although the research to improve Li-ion batteries is very active, other researches began to investigate alternative electrochemical energy storage systems with higher energy density. At present, the most promising technology is the Lithium-Sulphur (Li-S) battery. This paper presents a review of the state of art of Li-Sulphur battery on EVs compared to Li-ion ones, considering technical, modelling, environmental and economic aspects with the aim of depicting the challenges this technology has to overcome to substitute Li-ion in the near future. This study shows how the main drawbacks for Li-S concern are durability, self-discharge and battery modelling. However, from an environmental and economic point of view, Li-S technology presents many advantages over Li-ion.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electric equivalent circuit; Electric vehicle; Environmental assessment; Li-S battery; Modelling; Specific energy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30103198     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

1.  MCU-less biphasic electrical stimulation circuit for miniaturized neuromodulator.

Authors:  Himshekhar Das; Hangue Park
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  2D/1D V2O5 Nanoplates Anchored Carbon Nanofibers as Efficient Separator Interlayer for Highly Stable Lithium-Sulfur Battery.

Authors:  Zongtao Zhang; Guodong Wu; Haipeng Ji; Deliang Chen; Dengchao Xia; Keke Gao; Jianfei Xu; Bin Mao; Shasha Yi; Liying Zhang; Yu Wang; Ying Zhou; Litao Kang; Yanfeng Gao
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 3.  Seaweed's Role in Energetic Transition-From Environmental Pollution Challenges to Enhanced Electrochemical Devices.

Authors:  Susete Pinteus; Patrícia Susano; Celso Alves; Joana Silva; Alice Martins; Rui Pedrosa
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.