Literature DB >> 30102944

MRSA colonization status as a predictor of clinical infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guillaume Butler-Laporte1, Samuel De L'Étoile-Morel2, Matthew P Cheng3, Emily G McDonald4, Todd C Lee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is often used as empiric therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but can be associated with clinically important adverse events including renal failure. MRSA colonization swabs are primarily used for infection control; their use as a diagnostic test to inform the decision to add empiric vancomycin therapy has not been well elucidated.
METHODS: We performed a Medline and Embase systematic review for peer-reviewed studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of using MRSA colonization status to predict MRSA infections. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Grey literature was excluded.
FINDINGS: 29 studies were included involving 24225 patients. In cases where the pathogen is not known to be S. aureus, specificities were greater than 85% for bacteremia, lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), and all infections pooled together. Sensitivities ranged between 54.0% and 77.5%. In cases where the pathogen is known to be S. aureus, we found studies on bacteremia and SSTI and arrived at pooled estimates of sensitivities ranging between 56.6% and 56.9%, and of specificities greater than 91%. Most importantly, for most infections in settings where the prevalence of MRSA as a causative organism is below 15%, the negative predictive value of a negative MRSA colonization swab exceeds 90%. INTERPRETATIONS: In settings of low-moderate MRSA prevalence, negative MRSA screening swabs may prevent unnecessary vancomycin use. More research is needed to assess if this strategy can mitigate the cost of screening in areas with a low MRSA colonization rate.
Copyright © 2018 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteremia; Beta-lactam; Colonization; Empiric therapy; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102944     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  4 in total

1.  The effect of body mass index and creatinine clearance on serum trough concentration of vancomycin in adult patients.

Authors:  Yuyan Pan; Xiaomei He; Xinyu Yao; Xiaofeng Yang; Fengjiao Wang; Xinyuan Ding; Wenjuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Metal nanoparticles functionalized with nutraceutical Kaempferitrin from edible Crotalaria juncea, exert potent antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bhanuvalli R Shamprasad; Robert Lotha; Saisubramanian Nagarajan; Arvind Sivasubramanian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to MRSA vs. MSSA: What Should Guide Empiric Therapy?

Authors:  Marta Colaneri; Domenico Di Carlo; Alessandro Amatu; Lea Nadia Marvulli; Marta Corbella; Greta Petazzoni; Patrizia Cambieri; Alba Muzzi; Claudio Bandi; Angela Di Matteo; Paolo Sacchi; Francesco Mojoli; Raffaele Bruno
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Impact of Nasal Swabs on Empiric Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections (INSERT-RTI).

Authors:  Vanessa Huffman; Diana Carolina Andrade; Jared Ham; Kyle Brown; Leonid Melnitsky; Alejandro Lopez Cohen; Jayesh Parmar
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.