Literature DB >> 30102872

Longer-term effects of minimalist shoes on running performance, strength and bone density: A 20-week follow-up study.

Joel T Fuller1,2, Dominic Thewlis2,3, Margarita D Tsiros2, Nicholas A T Brown4, Joseph Hamill5, Jonathan D Buckley2.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether male runners improve running performance, running economy, ankle plantar flexor strength, and alter running biomechanics and lower limb bone mineral density when gradually transitioning to using minimalist shoes for 100% of weekly running. The study was a planned follow-up of runners (n = 50) who transitioned to minimalist or conventional shoes for 35% of weekly structured training in a previous 6-week randomised controlled trial. In that trial, running performance and economy improved more with minimalist shoes than conventional shoes. Runners in each group were instructed to continue running in their allocated shoe during their own preferred training programme for a further 20 weeks while increasing allocated shoe use to 100% of weekly training. At the 20-week follow-up, minimalist shoes did not affect performance (effect size: 0.19; p = 0.218), running economy (effect size: ≤ 0.24; p ≥ 0.388), stride rate or length (effect size: ≤ 0.12; p ≥ 0.550), foot strike (effect size: ≤ 0.25; p ≥ 0.366), or bone mineral density (effect size: ≤ 0.40; p ≥ 0.319). Minimalist shoes increased plantar flexor strength more than conventional shoes when runners trained with greater mean weekly training distances (shoe*distance interaction: p = 0.036). After greater improvements with minimalist shoes during the initial six weeks of a structured training programme, increasing minimalist shoe use from 35% to 100% over 20 weeks, when runners use their own preferred training programme, did not further improve performance, running economy or alter running biomechanics and lower limb bone mineral density. Minimalist shoes improved plantar flexor strength more than conventional shoes in runners with greater weekly training distances.

Keywords:  Athlete; biomechanics; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; energy expenditure; footwear

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102872     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1505958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  5 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 2.  Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes.

Authors:  Ana Marchena-Rodriguez; Ana Belen Ortega-Avila; Pablo Cervera-Garvi; David Cabello-Manrique; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Shock Acceleration and Attenuation during Running with Minimalist and Maximalist Shoes: A Time- and Frequency-Domain Analysis of Tibial Acceleration.

Authors:  Liangliang Xiang; Yaodong Gu; Ming Rong; Zixiang Gao; Tao Yang; Alan Wang; Vickie Shim; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Editorial: Managing physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways in high performance sport: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Paul S R Goods; François Billaut; Franck Brocherie; Julien Louis
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-10-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.