Literature DB >> 30102634

Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?

Benjamin Samstein1, Adam Griesemer2, Karim Halazun1, Tomoaki Kato2, James V Guarrera2, Daniel Cherqui3, Jean C Emond2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies.
BACKGROUND: Adoption of minimal access techniques to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been slowed by concerns about donor safety and the quality of the grafts.
METHODS: Of 344 donor hepatectomies (DHs) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) since 1998, 51 pure LDH have been performed since 2009. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), based on prospectively collected data. There were 31 left lateral sectionectomy and 20 full lobectomies LH. We matched full lobe LH to open DH prior to introduction of LH.
RESULTS: LH increased from 21% of all DH in first 5 years of performing LH to 45% of DH in the most recent 3 years. Laparoscopic donors were more likely female, had lower body mass index, smaller total livers, and smaller allografts but longer operating room times. In the total LD experience, total 5 donors were converted to open surgery (10%), 2 donors required transfusion (4%), and there was 2 donor bile leaks (4%). Recipient patient and graft 1-year survival was 98% and 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that LDH for LDLT can be safely used with appropriate attention to learning curve and progression from left lateral sectionectomy to right hepatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102634     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  Pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy using the Glissonean pedicle approach (with video).

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takeshi Takahara; Hirokatsu Katagiri; Shoji Kanno; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open living donor hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuye Gao; Wu Wu; Chunyu Liu; Tao Liu; Heng Xiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Pure laparoscopic versus open donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michail Papoulas; Abdul Rahman Hakeem; Nigel Heaton; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Pure 3D laparoscopy versus open right hemihepatectomy in a donor with type II and III portal vein variations.

Authors:  Kyungho Park; Ahmed Shehta; Jeong-Moo Lee; Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung Chul Yoon; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Ji Seon Jeong; Wongook Wi; Yoon Joo Chung; Jong Man Kim; Gyu-Seong Choi; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Sangbin Han; Mi Sook Gwak; Gaab Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of liver regeneration in laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jaehun Yang; Jong Man Kim; Jinsoo Rhu; Sangjin Kim; Seohee Lee; Gyu-Seong Choi; Jae-Won Joh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 7.  Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.