Literature DB >> 30102555

Ovarian cancer screening-ultrasound; impact on ovarian cancer mortality.

Rasha Kamal1, Soha Hamed1, Sahar Mansour1, Yasmine Mounir1, Sahar Abdel Sallam2.   

Abstract

Although ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal of all female malignancies, debate still exists concerning the benefits and harms of the screening programs and their impact on long-term survival and mortality from the disease. The most widely tested screening strategies have focused on transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and on algorithms that measure serum levels or interval changes of cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) either individually or in combination. Transvaginal ultrasound can identify size and morphology changes of the ovary that may signal a developing malignancy; yet, it is still accused of having a low specificity. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from OC is still unclear and warrants further validation. In spite of having many published prospective studies, up to-date, none have been able to demonstrate conclusively a reduction in mortality from OC both in the screened general or high-risk population. Data from the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial has not shown survival or mortality benefits in the general population. Most prospective trials have reported a decrease in stage at detection (with the exception of the PLCO trial), thereby allowing treatment to be initiated when the disease is most curable. Research is in progress to develop new diagnostic tests and novel biomarkers, which when used in combination can increase the accuracy and outcomes of screening. In this review article, we will discuss the debate provoked on OC screening programs and the impact of using ultrasound on the reduction of OC-related mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102555      PMCID: PMC6350495          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current update on the molecular genetics and management of hereditary ovarian cancers: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Malak Itani; Neeraj Lalwani; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Maria Zulfiqar; Cary Siegel
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 2.  Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ana Paula Pagano; Katherine L Ford; Kathryn N Porter Starr; Nicole Kiss; Helen Steed; Janice Y Kung; Rajavel Elango; Carla M Prado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Weekly cisplatin for the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer: A protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dan-Feng Zhang; Peng-Hui Dou; Dong-Xu Zhao; Jing Li; Yu-Hong Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  NF-κB Signaling in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Brittney S Harrington; Christina M Annunziata
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Progesterone reduces cell survival in primary cultures of endometrioid ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Pedernera; María J Gómora; Flavia Morales-Vásquez; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Carmen Mendez
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Assessment of peritoneal microbial features and tumor marker levels as potential diagnostic tools for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ruizhong Miao; Taylor C Badger; Kathleen Groesch; Paula L Diaz-Sylvester; Teresa Wilson; Allen Ghareeb; Jongjin Anne Martin; Melissa Cregger; Michael Welge; Colleen Bushell; Loretta Auvil; Ruoqing Zhu; Laurent Brard; Andrea Braundmeier-Fleming
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extracellular Vesicle Molecular Signatures Characterize Metastatic Dynamicity in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Amber Gonda; Nanxia Zhao; Jay V Shah; Jake N Siebert; Srujanesh Gunda; Berk Inan; Mijung Kwon; Steven K Libutti; Prabhas V Moghe; Nicola L Francis; Vidya Ganapathy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Detecting TP53 mutations in diagnostic and archival liquid-based Pap samples from ovarian cancer patients using an ultra-sensitive ddPCR method.

Authors:  Nicolai Skovbjerg Arildsen; Laura Martin de la Fuente; Anna Måsbäck; Susanne Malander; Ola Forslund; Päivi Kannisto; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.