Literature DB >> 30102438

Radiomic signature as a predictive factor for lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer.

Yangyang Kan1,2,3, Di Dong4,5, Yuchen Zhang6, Wenyan Jiang2,3, Nannan Zhao2,3, Lu Han2,3, Mengjie Fang4,5, Yali Zang4,5, Chaoen Hu4,5, Jie Tian4,5, Chunming Li6, Yahong Luo1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the principal risk factor for poor outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Radiomics may offer a noninvasive way for predicting the stage of LNM.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a radiomic signature of LN involvement based on sagittal T1 contrast-enhanced (CE) and T2 MRI sequences. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 143 patients were randomly divided into two primary and validation cohorts with 100 patients in the primary cohort and 43 patients in the validation cohort. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1 CE and T2 MRI sequences at 3T. ASSESSMENT: The gold standard of LN status was based on histologic results. A radiologist with 10 years of experience used the ITK-SNAP software for 3D manual segmentation. A senior radiologist with 15 years of experience validated all segmentations. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC), classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used between LNM and non-LNM groups. STATISTICAL TESTS: A total of 970 radiomic features and seven clinical characteristics were extracted. Minimum redundancy / maximum relevance and support vector machine algorithms were applied to select features and construct a radiomic signature. The Mann-Whitney U-test and the chi-square test were used to test the performance of clinical characteristics and potential prognostic outcomes. The results were used to assess the quantitative discrimination performance of the SVM-based radiomic signature.
RESULTS: The radiomic signatures allowed good discrimination between LNM and non-LNM groups. The ROC AUC was 0.753 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.656-0.850) in the primary cohort and 0.754 (95% CI, 0584-0.924) in the validation cohort. DATA
CONCLUSIONS: A multiple-sequence MRI radiomic signature can be used as a noninvasive biomarker for preoperative assessment of LN status and potentially influence the therapeutic decision-making in early-stage cervical cancer patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:304-310.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102438     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  16 in total

1.  An MRI-based radiomics signature and clinical characteristics for survival prediction in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ru-Ru Zheng; Meng-Ting Cai; Li Lan; Xiao Wan Huang; Yun Jun Yang; Martin Powell; Feng Lin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Development of a deep learning-based nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Yujia Liu; Hui Duan; Di Dong; Jiaming Chen; Lianzhen Zhong; Liwen Zhang; Runnan Cao; Huijian Fan; Zhumei Cui; Ping Liu; Shan Kang; Xuemei Zhan; Shaoguang Wang; Xun Zhao; Chunlin Chen; Jie Tian
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

3.  A preoperative radiomics model for the identification of lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lifen Yan; Huasheng Yao; Ruichun Long; Lei Wu; Haotian Xia; Jinglei Li; Zaiyi Liu; Changhong Liang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A novel 2-deoxy-2-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-based nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in early stage uterine cervical squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Zheng Feng; Jiajia Zhang; Huijuan Ge; Xiaohua Wu; Shaoli Song
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  A Comprehensive Nomogram Combining CT Imaging with Clinical Features for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Stage I-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xingxing Zheng; Jingjing Shao; Linli Zhou; Li Wang; Yaqiong Ge; Gaoren Wang; Feng Feng
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Development of a Deep Learning Model to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Qingxia Wu; Shuo Wang; Shuixing Zhang; Meiyun Wang; Yingying Ding; Jin Fang; Qingxia Wu; Wei Qian; Zhenyu Liu; Kai Sun; Yan Jin; He Ma; Jie Tian
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  Knockdown of BRCC3 exerts an anti‑tumor effect on cervical cancer in vitro.

Authors:  Feifang Zhang; Qun Zhou
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.952

8.  Impact of different scanners and acquisition parameters on robustness of MR radiomics features based on women's cervix.

Authors:  Honglan Mi; Mingyuan Yuan; Shiteng Suo; Jiejun Cheng; Suqin Li; Shaofeng Duan; Qing Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pretreatment MRI Radiomics Based Response Prediction Model in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui; Rosa Autorino; Maura Miccò; Alessia Nardangeli; Adele Pesce; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Davide Cusumano; Luca Russo; Salvatore Persiani; Luca Boldrini; Nicola Dinapoli; Gabriella Macchia; Giuseppina Sallustio; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Gabriella Ferrandina; Riccardo Manfredi; Vincenzo Valentini; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 10.  Radiomics in Oncology, Part 2: Thoracic, Genito-Urinary, Breast, Neurological, Hematologic and Musculoskeletal Applications.

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Michela Polici; Marta Zerunian; Francesco Pucciarelli; Gisella Guido; Tiziano Polidori; Federica Landolfi; Matteo Nicolai; Elena Lucertini; Mariarita Tarallo; Benedetta Bracci; Ilaria Nacci; Carlotta Rucci; Marwen Eid; Elsa Iannicelli; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.