Literature DB >> 30102281

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris.

Katherine M Martin1, Elizabeth A Hasenmueller2, John R White3, Lisa G Chambers4, Jeremy L Conkle5.   

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence of plastic debris in the ocean is widely recognized by the public, scientific communities, and government agencies. However, only recently have microplastics in freshwater systems, such as rivers and lakes, been quantified. Microplastic sampling at the surface usually consists of deploying drift nets behind either a stationary or moving boat, which limits the sampling to environments with low levels of suspended sediments and floating or submerged debris. Previous studies that employed drift nets to collect microplastic debris typically used nets with ≥300 µm mesh size, allowing plastic debris (particles and fibers) below this size to pass through the net and elude quantification. The protocol detailed here enables: 1) sample collection in environments with high suspended loads and floating or submerged debris and 2) the capture and quantification of microplastic particles and fibers <300 µm. Water samples were collected using a peristaltic pump in low-density polyethylene (PE) containers to be stored before filtering and analysis in the lab. Filtration was done with a custom-made microplastic filtration device containing detachable union joints that housed nylon mesh sieves and mixed cellulose ester membrane filters. Mesh sieves and membrane filters were examined with a stereomicroscope to quantify and separate microplastic particulates and fibers. These materials were then examined using a micro-attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (micro ATR-FTIR) to determine microplastic polymer type. Recovery was measured by spiking samples using blue PE particulates and green nylon fibers; percent recovery was determined to be 100% for particulates and 92% for fibers. This protocol will guide similar studies on microplastics in high velocity rivers with high concentrations of sediment. With simple modifications to the peristaltic pump and filtration device, users can collect and analyze various sample volumes and particulate sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102281      PMCID: PMC6126583          DOI: 10.3791/57969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  17 in total

Review 1.  Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review.

Authors:  Matthew Cole; Pennie Lindeque; Claudia Halsband; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of microplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Julia Talvitie; Mari Heinonen; Jari-Pekka Pääkkönen; Emil Vahtera; Anna Mikola; Outi Setälä; Riku Vahala
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Scientific Evidence Supports a Ban on Microbeads.

Authors:  Chelsea M Rochman; Sara M Kross; Jonathan B Armstrong; Michael T Bogan; Emily S Darling; Stephanie J Green; Ashley R Smyth; Diogo Veríssimo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge.

Authors:  Kimberly Ann V Zubris; Brian K Richards
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers.

Authors:  Lisa S Fendall; Mary A Sewell
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Plastic in the Thames: a river runs through it.

Authors:  David Morritt; Paris V Stefanoudis; Dave Pearce; Oliver A Crimmen; Paul F Clark
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Using a forensic science approach to minimize environmental contamination and to identify microfibres in marine sediments.

Authors:  Lucy C Woodall; Claire Gwinnett; Margaret Packer; Richard C Thompson; Laura F Robinson; Gordon L J Paterson
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Marine pollution. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean.

Authors:  Jenna R Jambeck; Roland Geyer; Chris Wilcox; Theodore R Siegler; Miriam Perryman; Anthony Andrady; Ramani Narayan; Kara Lavender Law
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks.

Authors:  Mark Anthony Browne; Phillip Crump; Stewart J Niven; Emma Teuten; Andrew Tonkin; Tamara Galloway; Richard Thompson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Microplastics profile along the Rhine River.

Authors:  Thomas Mani; Armin Hauk; Ulrich Walter; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics.

Authors:  Win Cowger; Andy M Booth; Bonnie M Hamilton; Clara Thaysen; Sebastian Primpke; Keenan Munno; Amy L Lusher; Alexandre Dehaut; Vitor P Vaz; Max Liboiron; Lisa I Devriese; Ludovic Hermabessiere; Chelsea Rochman; Samantha N Athey; Jennifer M Lynch; Hannah De Frond; Andrew Gray; Oliver A H Jones; Susanne Brander; Clare Steele; Shelly Moore; Alterra Sanchez; Holly Nel
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.388

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.