Courtney Casserly1,2, Estelle E Seyman1, Paula Alcaide-Leon3, Melanie Guenette1, Carrie Lyons1, Stephanie Sankar1, Anton Svendrovski1, Stefan Baral4, Jiwon Oh1,5. 1. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Neurology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 5. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal cord atrophy (SCA) is an important emerging outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, there is limited consensus on the magnitude and rate of atrophy. The objective of this study was to synthesize the available data on measures of SCA in MS. METHODS: Using published guidelines, relevant literature databases were searched between 1977 and 2017 for case-control or cohort studies reporting a quantitative measure of SCA in MS patients. Random-effects models pooled cross-sectional measures and longitudinal rates of SCA in MS and healthy controls (HCs). Student's t-test assessed differences between pooled measures in patient subgroups. Heterogeneity was assessed using DerSimonian and Laird's Q-test and the I 2 -index. RESULTS: A total of 1,465 studies were retrieved including 94 that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled estimates of mean cervical spinal cord (SC) cross-sectional area (CSA) in all MS patients, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), all progressive MS, secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary-progressive MS (PPMS), and HC were: 73.07 mm2 (95% CI [71.52-74.62]), 78.88 mm2 (95% CI [76.92-80.85]), 69.72 mm2 (95% CI [67.96-71.48]), 68.55 mm2 (95% CI [65.43-71.66]), 70.98 mm2 (95% CI [68.78-73.19]), and 80.87 mm2 (95% C I [78.70-83.04]), respectively. Pooled SC-CSA was greater in HC versus MS (P < .001) and RRMS versus progressive MS (P < .001). SCA showed moderate correlations with global disability in cross-sectional studies (r-value with disability score range [-.75 to -.22]). In longitudinal studies, the pooled annual rate of SCA was 1.78%/year (95%CI [1.28-2.27]). CONCLUSIONS: The SC is atrophied in MS. The magnitude of SCA is greater in progressive versus relapsing forms and correlates with clinical disability. The pooled estimate of annual rate of SCA is greater than reported rates of brain atrophy in MS. These results demonstrate that SCA is highly relevant as an imaging outcome in MS clinical trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Spinal cord atrophy (SCA) is an important emerging outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, there is limited consensus on the magnitude and rate of atrophy. The objective of this study was to synthesize the available data on measures of SCA in MS. METHODS: Using published guidelines, relevant literature databases were searched between 1977 and 2017 for case-control or cohort studies reporting a quantitative measure of SCA in MS patients. Random-effects models pooled cross-sectional measures and longitudinal rates of SCA in MS and healthy controls (HCs). Student's t-test assessed differences between pooled measures in patient subgroups. Heterogeneity was assessed using DerSimonian and Laird's Q-test and the I 2 -index. RESULTS: A total of 1,465 studies were retrieved including 94 that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled estimates of mean cervical spinal cord (SC) cross-sectional area (CSA) in all MS patients, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), all progressive MS, secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary-progressive MS (PPMS), and HC were: 73.07 mm2 (95% CI [71.52-74.62]), 78.88 mm2 (95% CI [76.92-80.85]), 69.72 mm2 (95% CI [67.96-71.48]), 68.55 mm2 (95% CI [65.43-71.66]), 70.98 mm2 (95% CI [68.78-73.19]), and 80.87 mm2 (95% C I [78.70-83.04]), respectively. Pooled SC-CSA was greater in HC versus MS (P < .001) and RRMS versus progressive MS (P < .001). SCA showed moderate correlations with global disability in cross-sectional studies (r-value with disability score range [-.75 to -.22]). In longitudinal studies, the pooled annual rate of SCA was 1.78%/year (95%CI [1.28-2.27]). CONCLUSIONS: The SC is atrophied in MS. The magnitude of SCA is greater in progressive versus relapsing forms and correlates with clinical disability. The pooled estimate of annual rate of SCA is greater than reported rates of brain atrophy in MS. These results demonstrate that SCA is highly relevant as an imaging outcome in MS clinical trials.
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Min Chen; Kateryna Cybulsky; Suradech Suthiphosuwan; Estelle Seyman; Blake Dewey; Marie Diener-West; Peter van Zijl; Jerry Prince; Daniel S Reich; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Andres G Barboza; Edgar Carnero Contentti; Maria Celeste Curbelo; Mario Javier Halfon; Juan Ignacio Rojas; Berenice A Silva; Vladimiro Sinay; Santiago Tizio; Maria Celica Ysrraelit; Ricardo Alonso Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Ellen Iacobaeus; Georgina Arrambide; Maria Pia Amato; Tobias Derfuss; Sandra Vukusic; Bernhard Hemmer; Mar Tintore; Lou Brundin Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 6.312