Literature DB >> 30101501

Tundra landscape heterogeneity, not interannual variability, controls the decadal regional carbon balance in the Western Russian Arctic.

Claire C Treat1, Maija E Marushchak1, Carolina Voigt1, Yu Zhang2, Zeli Tan3,4, Qianlai Zhuang4, Tarmo A Virtanen5, Aleksi Räsänen5,6, Christina Biasi1, Gustaf Hugelius7, Dmitry Kaverin8, Paul A Miller9, Martin Stendel10, Vladimir Romanovsky11,12, Felix Rivkin13, Pertti J Martikainen1, Narasinha J Shurpali1.   

Abstract

Across the Arctic, the net ecosystem carbon (C) balance of tundra ecosystems is highly uncertain due to substantial temporal variability of C fluxes and to landscape heterogeneity. We modeled both carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and methane (CH4 ) fluxes for the dominant land cover types in a ~100-km2 sub-Arctic tundra region in northeast European Russia for the period of 2006-2015 using process-based biogeochemical models. Modeled net annual CO2 fluxes ranged from -300 g C m-2  year-1 [net uptake] in a willow fen to 3 g C m-2  year-1 [net source] in dry lichen tundra. Modeled annual CH4 emissions ranged from -0.2 to 22.3 g C m-2  year-1 at a peat plateau site and a willow fen site, respectively. Interannual variability over the decade was relatively small (20%-25%) in comparison with variability among the land cover types (150%). Using high-resolution land cover classification, the region was a net sink of atmospheric CO2 across most land cover types but a net source of CH4 to the atmosphere due to high emissions from permafrost-free fens. Using a lower resolution for land cover classification resulted in a 20%-65% underestimation of regional CH4 flux relative to high-resolution classification and smaller (10%) overestimation of regional CO2 uptake due to the underestimation of wetland area by 60%. The relative fraction of uplands versus wetlands was key to determining the net regional C balance at this and other Arctic tundra sites because wetlands were hot spots for C cycling in Arctic tundra ecosystems.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Russia; Tundra; ecosystem modeling; methane; net ecosystem CO2 exchange; peatland; permafrost; regional carbon balance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30101501     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  3 in total

1.  Impact of River Channel Lateral Migration on Microbial Communities across a Discontinuous Permafrost Floodplain.

Authors:  Madison M Douglas; Usha F Lingappa; Michael P Lamb; Joel C Rowland; A Joshua West; Gen Li; Preston C Kemeny; Austin J Chadwick; Anastasia Piliouras; Jon Schwenk; Woodward W Fischer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evidence for non-steady-state carbon emissions from snow-scoured alpine tundra.

Authors:  John F Knowles; Peter D Blanken; Corey R Lawrence; Mark W Williams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Assessing dynamic vegetation model parameter uncertainty across Alaskan arctic tundra plant communities.

Authors:  Eugénie S Euskirchen; Shawn P Serbin; Tobey B Carman; Jennifer M Fraterrigo; Hélène Genet; Colleen M Iversen; Verity Salmon; A David McGuire
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.