| Literature DB >> 30101204 |
Anberber Manyazewal1, Stomeo Francesca2, Mahendra Pal3, Mamo Gezahegn3, Mulatu Tesfaye4, Muthui Lucy2, Wegayehu Teklu5, Tilahun Getachew6.
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Cryptosporidium infection and identify species of the parasite in cattle in central Ethiopia. Faecal samples, collected from 392 dairy cattle managed under intensive and extensive production system, were analyzed by the Modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) microscopy, Nested PCR, PCR-RFLP and sequence analyses of the SSU rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium. The overall prevalence, the prevalence in the extensive and intensive farms was 18.6%, 11% and 21%, respectively. The infection was detected in 37.7% of the investigated farms with prevalence range of 7.4% -100%, and all of the six surveyed districts with significant (P = 0.000) prevalence difference. Restriction digestion and sequence analysis showed Cryptosporidium parvum and C. andersoni in 27% and 73% of the infections, respectively, showing an age related distribution pattern, C. parvum exclusively occurring in calves <2 months old and C. andersoni only in heifers and adult cattle. The infection was significantly associated with management system, farm location, herd size, source of drinking water, weaning age, presence of bedding, pen cleanness and cleanness of hindquarter. In conclusion, Cryptosporidium infection due to C. parvum and C. andersoni was prevalent in cattle in the study area. Cryptosporidium parvum has the concern of public health importance, especially to farm workers and people in close contact with cattle. Instigation of imperative control measure is suggested to lessen the risk of human infection and loss of production in dairy farms.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; Ethiopia; PCR-RFLP; Prevalence; Risk factors
Year: 2018 PMID: 30101204 PMCID: PMC6076407 DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports ISSN: 2405-9390
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle by Age, sex and management system (June/2014 - Dec /2015) (N = 392).
| Variables | Group | No | Prevalence | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 95% CI | ||||
| Age group | <2 months | 104 | 17.3 | 9.8–24.8 | 0.749 |
| 2–6 months | 209 | 18.2 | 12.9–23.5 | ||
| >6 months | 79 | 21.5 | 2.9–30.2 | ||
| Sex | Female | 253 | 21.3 | 16.5–26.1 | 0.062 |
| Male | 139 | 13.7 | 7.2–20.1 | ||
| Management system | Extensive | 107 | 11.2 | 3.8–18.6 | 0.021 |
| Intensive | 285 | 21.4 | 16.9–25.9 | ||
| Farm location | Rural | 313 | 12.8 | 8.6–16.9 | 0.000 |
| Urban | 79 | 41.8 | 33.5–50.0 | ||
| Overall | 392 | 18.6 | 14.75–22.49 | ||
Number of samples.
Confidence interval.
Risk factors of Cryptosporidium related to general management system in cattle in Addis Ababa and its environs, June 2014–Dec /2015(N = 392).
| Risk factors | Label | Prevalence (%) | Adjusted OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | P value | |||
| Management system | Extensive | 11.2 | 2.16 | 1.1–4.2 | 0.016 |
| Intensive | 21.4 | ||||
| Farm location | Rural | 12.8 | 4.89 | 2.8–8.5 | 0.000 |
| Urban | 41.8 | ||||
| Presence of calving pen | Yes | 9.6 | 2.46 | 1.1–5.6 | 0.019 |
| No | 20.7 | ||||
| Method of colostrum feeding | Hand feeding | 11.8 | 2.15 | 1.2–3.9 | 0.009 |
| Suckling | 22.3 | ||||
| Presence of bedding | Yes | 4.26 | 10.55 | 4.9–22.7 | 0.000 |
| No | 31.7 | ||||
| Weaning age | <6 months | 17.5 | 3.45 | 1.8–6.8 | 0.001 |
| ≥6 months | 42.2 | ||||
| Herd size | >100 | 7.4 | 0.000 | ||
| <30 | 18.9 | 2.93 | 1.4–6.1 | ||
| 30–100 | 35.8 | 6.99 | 3.3–14.7 | ||
Odds ratio.
Confidence interval.
Risk factors of Cryptosporidium related to water and sanitation in cattle in Addis Ababa and its environs, June/ 2014–Dec 2015 (N = 392).
| Risk factors | Category | Prevalence (%) | Adjusted OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | p value | |||
| Source of drinking water | Pipe | 10.3 | 0.003 | ||
| Well | 21.4 | 2.36 | 1.2–4.9 | ||
| River/stream | 24.8 | 2.86 | 1.5–5.5 | ||
| Disposal of farm waste water | To a field | 14.6 | 2.79 | 1.6–4.9 | 0.000 |
| To well | 32.2 | ||||
| Access to water | Free access | 14.3 | 2.11 | 1.1–4.0 | 0.018 |
| Limited | 26.0 | ||||
| Presence of other diseases | No | 16.4 | 5.10 | 2.3–11.6 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 50.0 | ||||
| Pen cleanness | Clean | 12.4 | 2.37 | 1.1–4.9 | 0.014 |
| Medium/unclean | 25.0 | ||||
| Cleanliness of hindquarter | Clean | 13.1 | 1.96 | 1.1–3.4 | 0.013 |
| Medium/unclean | 22.8 | ||||
| Pen type | Individual pen | 10.4 | 2.66 | 1.0–7.0 | 0.030 |
| Group pen | 23.6 | ||||
Odds ratio.
Confidence interval.
Fig. 1Species identification of Cryptosporidium by PCR-RFLP analysis of the 18S rRNA gene.
Digestion by SspI (A) and MboII (B) restriction enzymes.
Lane 1: 100 bp ladder; Lanes 2 & 4: C. andersoni; Lane 3: C. parvum.