| Literature DB >> 30101160 |
Aaron R Bishop1, Sunjung Kim2, Matthew Squire3, Warren E Rose4,3, Heidi-Lynn Ploeg1,2,3.
Abstract
In this article, we report data on the antibiotic elution and efficacy, and mechanical properties of Palacos bone cement with different amounts of added vancomycin (0.0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 g), see "Vancomycin elution, activity and impact on mechanical properties when added to orthopedic bone cement" (Bishop et al., 2018) [1]. Mechanical testing was performed for four-point bending, compression, and fracture toughness. The release characteristics of vancomycin was recorded for up to 60 days to estimate the elution profile. The eluted vancomycin efficacy at eliminating the four most common causative orthopedic implant pathogens is also reported.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30101160 PMCID: PMC6083008 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Results from four-point bend testing. Results are reported as median ± 1 standard deviation.
| Palacos | – | – | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2192 ± 164.2 | 55.40 ± 3.531 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.125 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2349 ± 163.9 | 57.72 ± 1.515 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.25 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2357 ± 301.0 | 52.63 ± 2.221 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.50 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2267 ± 200.4 | 56.71 ± 2.331 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 1.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2369 ± 64.00 | 55.80 ± 1.541 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 2.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2038 ± 164.2 | 46.80 ± 1.700 |
Significantly higher than the ISO minimum requirement of 1800 MPa.
Significantly lower than control׳s bending modulus.
Significantly higher than the ISO minimum requirement of 50 MPa.
Significantly lower than control׳s bending strength.
Results from compression testing. Results are reported as median ± 1 standard deviation.
| Palacos | – | – | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 1559 ± 207.4 | 82.71 ± 63.52 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.125 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 1543 ± 246.7 | 78.61 ± 47.91 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.25 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 1279 ± 230.1 | 77.01 ± 47.92 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.50 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 1282 ± 301.2 | 73.12 ± 33.34 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 1.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 1098 ± 182.9 | 69.62 ± 25.44 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 2.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 980.7 ± 230.4 | 61.72 ± 11.54 |
Significantly lower than control׳s compressive modulus.
Significantly higher than the ISO minimum requirement of 70 MPa.
Significantly lower than control׳s compressive yield strength.
Results from fracture toughness testing. Results are reported as median ± 1 standard deviation.
| Palacos | – | – | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.685 ± 0.091 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.125 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.627 ± 0.419 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.25 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.428 ± 0.267 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 0.50 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.467 ± 0.222 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 1.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.465 ± 0.166 |
| Palacos | Vancomycin | 2.0 | Vacuum | Ambient, saline, 21 days | Ambient | 2.187 ± 0.175 |
Drug elution results over 60 days. Results (all units are mg) are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.010 | 0.003 | 0.022 | 0.005 | 0.052 | 0.017 | 0.048 | 0.011 |
| 2 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.052 | 0.000 | 0.048 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 0.020 | 0.005 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.041 | 0.005 | 0.079 | 0.010 | 0.070 | 0.006 |
| 8 | 0.030 | 0.005 | 0.033 | 0.001 | 0.059 | 0.002 | 0.104 | 0.007 | 0.097 | 0.002 |
| 10 | 0.030 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.104 | 0.000 | 0.097 | 0.000 |
| 15 | 0.030 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.104 | 0.000 | 0.097 | 0.000 |
| 25 | 0.030 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.098 | 0.000 |
| 45 | 0.030 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.099 | 0.000 |
| 60 | 0.031 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.100 | 0.000 |
Antimicrobial activity of eluted vancomycin (0.5 g) for three S. aureus strains. Results (all units are ) (colony forming units, CFU) are reported as mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD).
| 0 | 3.070 | 0.150 | 3.150 | 0.010 | 3.150 | 0.050 |
| 1 | 1.620 | 0.320 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 5 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 6 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 15 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
Antimicrobial activity of eluted vancomycin (0.125–2.0 g) for S.epidermidis 35984. Results (all units are ) are reported as mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD).
| 0 | 3.090 | 0.040 | 3.090 | 0.040 | 3.090 | 0.040 | 3.090 | 0.040 | 3.090 | 0.040 |
| 1 | 4.500 | 1.000 | 2.610 | 2.330 | 1.700 | 1.700 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 4.320 | 0.290 |
| 2 | 5.040 | 0.790 | 4.000 | 0.870 | 3.680 | 3.230 | 2.540 | 2.410 | 3.520 | 3.060 |
| 3 | 4.900 | 1.040 | 4.400 | 1.250 | 3.380 | 0.150 | 4.040 | 1.020 | 2.310 | 2.010 |
| 4 | 5.250 | 0.350 | 5.270 | 0.140 | 5.040 | 0.190 | 4.670 | 0.160 | 4.550 | 0.280 |
| 5 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.500 | 1.000 |
| 6 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 4.320 | 1.140 | 3.810 | 1.240 | 2.820 | 2.640 | 1.940 | 1.680 |
| 7 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.330 | 0.150 | 4.940 | 0.530 | 4.360 | 1.590 | 1.370 | 2.380 |
| 15 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 5.500 | 1.000 | 1.830 | 3.180 | 0.610 | 1.050 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article | Bishop A.R., Kim S., Squire M.W., Rose W.E., Ploeg H., |