| Literature DB >> 30101082 |
Abstract
Traditional herbal medicines are attaining more popularity and are being widely practiced. Coriandrum sativum L. is one of the oldest herbal medicinal plants valued for its nutritional and medicinal properties. Present investigation was focussed on evaluation of attenuating potential of flavonoid rich extract of C. sativum (FCS) seeds against pathogenic markers of diabetic complications i.e. advanced glycation end products (AGEs), sorbitol and aldose reductase (ALR); by using in-vitro methods. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Infrared spectroscopy of FCS revealed the presence of different flavonoids. Results demonstrated that FCS has produced 79.80% inhibition of AGEs formation. Additionally, FCS was effective against sorbitol accumulation and ALR inhibition with IC50 values of 221 μg/ml and 6.08 μg/ml respectively. Molecular docking was conducted against three binding site for ALR, RAGEs and sorbitol dehydrogenase to explore their binding interactions with identified flavonoids. The constituents F2, F4 and F6 have shown good binding interactions with all the receptors. The visualisation of the docked complexes revealed the occurrence of hydrophobic forces and hydrogen bonding in receptor and docked constituents. The results were in support with experimental inhibitory activities of FCS against these biomarkers and provide a considerable basis for the identification and development of new inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: AG, aminoguanidine; AGEs; ALR; C. sativum; DAG, diacyl glycerol; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FCS; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PKC, protein kinase C; Sorbitol
Year: 2018 PMID: 30101082 PMCID: PMC6082972 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1GC–MS analysis results of FCS showing different peaks.
Fig. 2TLC bioautograph of FCS showing presence of antioxidant compounds.
Results of GC–MS analysis of flavonoid rich extract of C. sativum seeds (FCS).
| Peak | Retention time | Area (%) | Database/NIST 14 library |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (F1) | 6.82 | 20.71 | 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one |
| 2 (F2) | 6.92 | 11.01 | Quertcetin-3-O-rutinoside |
| 3 (F3) | 7.58 | 12.08 | 3,5,7-Trihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4 |
| 4 (F4) | 14.04 | 10.58 | 3,3’,4’,5,7-Flavanpentol |
| 5 (F5) | 35.57 | 23.63 | 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4-chromenone |
| 6 (F6) | 39.08 | 11.38 | 7-O-methylquercetin |
| 7 (F7) | 39.86 | 10.40 | 4’,5,7-Trihydroxyflavone |
Fig. 3IR spectra of FCS showing presence of different functional groups of active constituents.
Fig. 4Inhibitory effects of FCS against A: Sorbitol accumulation, B: AGEs inhibition and C: ALR enzyme inhibition.
Binding interactions of ALR, RAGE and sorbitol dehydrogenase with identified constituents of FCS.
| Targets | Compound | Docking | Hydrogen bonding | Hydrophobic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid | Distance (Å) | ||||
| ALR | (F1) | −2.65 | SER218 | 2.52 | – |
| (F2) | −3.33 | TYR209 | 2.12 | TRP111, CYS298, ILE260 | |
| ASN160 | 2.43 | ||||
| (F3) | −3.22 | TRP319 | 1.64 | – | |
| (F4) | −2.94 | – | – | SER214,TRP20A, LYS21A, ILE260 | |
| (F5) | −3.52 | TRP219 | 1.75 | – | |
| (F6) | −2.78 | TRP219 | 1.57 | GLN183, ILE260, ASP43A, LYS77A, TYR209 | |
| (F7) | −3.46 | SER214 | 2.14 | – | |
| RAGEs | (F1) | −3.11 | Van der waal’s interactions only | ||
| (F2) | −1.34 | – | – | GLY199, VAL229, THR195, LEU332, VAL194 | |
| (F3) | −2.61 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| (F4) | −2.17 | – | – | ASP201, PRO196, GLY200, VAL229, PRO132 | |
| (F5) | −3.03 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| (F6) | −0.52 | – | – | THR134, PRO196, LEU133, VAL229,GLU132 | |
| (F7) | −3.01 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| AG (standard) | −2.21 | GLY45B, | 1.23 | ASP201, PRO196, GLY200, VAL229, PRO132 | |
| Sorbitol dehydrogenase | (F1) | −4.78 | Van der waal’s interactions only | ||
| (F2) | −4.94 | – | – | CYS44B, GLY453, ILE56B, LEU274, SER46B,GLY672 | |
| (F3) | −3.84 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| (F4) | −4.39 | – | – | ILE183,PRO182,GLY45B, | |
| (F5) | −4.84 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| (F6) | −4.61 | – | – | PRO182 | |
| (F7) | −4.75 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
| Ascorbic acid | −3.98 | Van der waal’s interactions only | |||
Fig. 5Binding interactions of F2, F4, F5 and F6 with ALR enzyme.
Fig. 6Binding interactions of F2, F4, and F6 with RAGEs.
Fig. 7Binding interactions of F2, F4 and F6 with Sorbitol dehydrogenase.