| Literature DB >> 30101053 |
Sukjae Jang1, Dabin Son1, Sunbin Hwang1, Minji Kang1, Seoung-Ki Lee1, Dae-Young Jeon1, Sukang Bae1, Sang Hyun Lee1, Dong Su Lee1, Tae-Wook Kim1.
Abstract
Low voltage operationEntities:
Keywords: ALD Al2O3; Hybrid dielectrics; Organic transistor; PA-SAM; Phosphonic acid; Water contact angle
Year: 2018 PMID: 30101053 PMCID: PMC6061253 DOI: 10.1186/s40580-018-0152-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Converg ISSN: 2196-5404
Fig. 1a Schematic structure of an OFET with a hybrid dielectric. b Molecular structures of the various PA-SAMs used in this study. [1: Hexylphosphonic acid (HPA) (C6), 2: dodecylphosphonic acid (DDPA) (C12), 3: octadecylphosphonic acid (ODPA) (C18), 4: 16-phosphonohexadecanoic acid (PHDA), 5: 12-mercaptododecylphosphonic acid (MDPA), 6: 12-pentafluorophenoxydodecylphosphonic acid (PFPA), 7: 11-hydroxyundecylphosphonic acid (HUPA)]
Fig. 2a Water droplets on hybrid dielectrics and measured contact angles, b capacitive densities–frequency (C–F) and c leakage current densities–voltage (J–V) of hybrid dielectrics with various PA-SAMs
Thin film parameters of the hybrid dielectrics with PA-SAMs
| Dielectric | Molecular lengtha (nm) | Contact angle (º) | Estimated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | – | 23 | < 10 | 279 | 7.2 |
| HPA | 1 | 0.91 | 102 | 246 | 2.2 |
| DDPA | 1.74 | 1.59 | 105.5 | 230 | 2.6 |
| ODPA | 2.49 | 2.27 | 109.8 | 222 | 2.8 |
| PHDA | 2.25 | 2.05 | 25.9 | 223 | 2.6 |
| MDPA | 1.9 | 1.74 | 65.1 | 240 | 3.4 |
| PFPA | 2.24 | 2.04 | 102 | 234 | 3.3 |
| HUPA | 1.72 | 1.57 | 28.5 | 239 | 3.0 |
Molecular length (nm), thickness of insulator (t) (nm), contact angle (°), capacitive density (C) at 10 kHz (nF/cm2) and Estimated dielectric constant k
a The molecular lengths of the PA-SAMs were estimated by assuming the conditions, such as the ideal bonding length and flat molecules according to the alkyl chain axis. The molecular lengths were defined as the distance between the hydrogen atom at the phosphonic acid and the opposite end atom along the alkyl chain axis
b t was the thickness of each Al2O3 and PA-SAM layer (not hybrid dielectric). The t of the reference Al2O3 was a measured value. The t of the PA-SAMs were calculated by assuming the calculated molecular lengths, the tilted bonding angle to the substrate (24°) and full coverage with a high density on the substrate
c k was the calculated dielectric constant of each Al2O3 and PA-SAM layer (not hybrid dielectric) using Eqs. (1) and (2)
Fig. 3Transfer characteristics (solid line) and the square root of I (dashed line) as a function of V of the OFETs with hybrid dielectrics with various PA-SAMs a reference Al2O3, b HPA, c DDPA, d ODPA, e PHDA, f MDPA, g PFPA and h HUPA
Device characteristics of OFETs with hybrid dielectrics
| Dielectric | Contact angle (º) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | < 10 | 0.05 | 345 | − 2.18 | ~ 105 |
| HPA | 102 | 0.35 | 151 | − 1.71 | ~ 106 |
| DDPA | 105.5 | 0.41 | 173 | − 1.83 | ~ 106 |
| ODPA | 109.8 | 0.58 | 135 | − 1.84 | ~ 106 |
| PHDA | 25.9 | 0.02 | 493 | − 2.35 | ~ 104 |
| MDPA | 65.1 | 0.05 | 197 | − 1.64 | ~ 105 |
| PFPA | 102 | 0.27 | 198 | − 0.58 | ~ 106 |
| HUPA | 28.5 | 0.03 | 196 | − 1.95 | ~ 105 |
The contact angle (º), saturation field effect mobility μ (cm2/Vs), subthreshold slope SS (mV/decade), threshold voltage V (V), on–off current ratio I/I
μ (cm2/Vs), SS (mV/decade), V (V) and I/I were calculated
Fig. 4a Saturation field-effect mobilities and b subthreshold slopes of hybrid dielectrics with various PA-SAMs as a function of the water contact angle