| Literature DB >> 30100814 |
Magdalena Paczkowska1, Mikołaj Mizera1, Kornelia Lewandowska2, Maciej Kozak3, Andrzej Miklaszewski4, Judyta Cielecka-Piontek1.
Abstract
Following the preparation of inclusion complex of cetirizine (CTZ) and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), the compound was investigated to assess the possibility of modifying the physicochemical properties (solubility, release, stability, permeability) of CTZ after complexation that are vital for subsequent formulation studies involving the said complex. Changes in FT-IR/Raman spectra, DSC thermograms and XRD diffractograms confirmed the formation of a CTZ-β-CD system. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography with a DAD detector was employed to determine alterations of the CTZ concentration during studies following complexation. An analysis of a phase-solubility diagram of cCTZ = fcβ-CD indicated a linear rise in the solubility of CTZ as the concentration of β-CD increased. The inclusion of CTZ in a system with β-CD significantly reduced the instability of CTZ in the presence of oxidizing factors. It was also found that regardless of the pH of the acceptor fluids used in the release studies an increase was observed in the concentration of CTZ in CD system compared to its free form. The ability to permeate artificial biological membranes manifested by CTZ after complexation was enhanced as well. In summary, CD has significant potential to mask the bitter taste of CTZ and to counter the instability induced by oxidizing factors.Entities:
Keywords: Cetirizine hydrochloride; Chemical stability; Permeability; Quantum chemical calculations; Solubility; β-Cyclodextrin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30100814 PMCID: PMC6061035 DOI: 10.1007/s10847-018-0808-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem ISSN: 1388-3127 Impact factor: 1.633
Fig. 1FT-IR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of CTZ, β-CD, CTZ–β-CD physical mixture and CTZ–β-CD system, and calculated IR CTZ spectra (B3LYP/6-31G) (CTZ theo.) with chemical structure of cetirizine showing main groups (G1 phenyl group, G2 chlorophenyl group, G3 piperazinyl ethoxy acetic acid)
Selected characteristic vibronic features of CTZ
| Theory scaled (cm−1) | IR (cm−1) | Raman (cm−1) | Approximate description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 589 | 612 | C–O–H | |
|
|
|
| |
| 672 | 697 | 694 | O–H |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
| 773 | 783 | 784 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| 829 | 851 | C–H | |
| 844 | 867 | C–H | |
|
|
|
| |
| 979 | 1004 | C–C–C | |
| 988 | 1018 | C–C | |
| 1019 | 1045 | ||
| 1069 | 1093 | 1093 | C–H |
| 1102 | 1137 | C–N | |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
| 1168 | 1204 | C–H | |
| 1227 | 1235 | C–H | |
| 1243 | 1242 | C–H | |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| 1420 | 1407 | C–H | |
| 1449 | 1443 | C–H | |
|
|
| ||
| 1599 | 1605 | 1603 | C–C |
| 1777 | 1739 | 1743 | C=O |
| 2799 | C–H | ||
| 2843 | C–H | ||
| 2906 | 2869 | C–H | |
| 2986 | 2951 | C–H | |
| 3087 | 3054 | C–H | |
| 3611 | 3439 | O–H |
The most important characteristic vibrational bands of CTZ involved in the interaction with B-CD are marked as bold
s Stretching, b bending, r rocking, w wagging, sc scissoring, t twisting, oop out of the plane, br breathing, G1 phenyl group, G2 chlorophenyl group, G3 piperazinyl ethoxy acetic group
Fig. 2XRPD powder diffraction patterns of CTZ, β-CD, CTZ–β-CD physical mixture and CTZ–β-CD system
Fig. 3DSC thermograms of CTZ, β-CD, CTZ–β-CD physical mixture and CTZ–β-CD system
Validation parameters of CTZ determination by HILIC method
| Parameter | Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 1.2 | pH 5.0 | pH 6.2 | pH 7.4 | |
| Selectivity | ||||
| Peak symmetry factor (in range of 0.8–1.5 required) | 1.030 | 1.066 | 1.025 | 1.027 |
| Absence of interfering substances | Confirmed | Confirmed | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Limit of detection (LOD): LOD = 3 SD/ | 0.0097 | 0.6471 | 0.6413 | 1.2500 |
| Limit of quantification (LOQ): LOQ = 10 SD/ | 0.0294 | 1.9609 | 1.9436 | 3.7879 |
| Linearity: y = | ||||
| | 8.24 ± 0.11 | 4.84 ± 0.81 | 6.02 ± 0.11 | 5.34 ± 0.12 |
| | Insignificant | 6.49 ± 0.26 | 6.08 ± 0.13 | 5.04 ± 0.12 |
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.9998 | 0.9985 | 0.9982 | 0.9971 |
| Range of linearity (mg mL−1) | 0.01–3.59 | 0.64–5.16 | 0.64–4.38 | 0.57–5.72 |
| Accuracy | ||||
| Recovery (95–105% required) (%) | 96.07 | 95.31 | 95.39 | 95.31 |
| Precision | ||||
| Concentration (mg mL−1) | 0.5900 | 5.1600 | 4.2800 | 5.7200 |
| Average of six injections (mg mL−1) | 0.5668 | 4.9182 | 4.0829 | 5.4517 |
| SD | 0.0004 | 0.0070 | 0.0014 | 0.0113 |
| RSD (< 5% required) | 0.0781 | 0.1429 | 0.0335 | 0.2177 |
Where SD is the mean of standard deviations of determinations in the lower range of linearity and a is the directional coefficient of the plotted linear function
S standard deviation of the slope, S standard deviation of the intercept, t calculated values of Student’s t test, tα,f = 2.228 critical values of Student’s t test for degrees of freedom f = 10 and significance level α = 0.05
Fig. 4Phase-solubility diagram of cCTZ = fcβ-CD with statistical evaluation
Kinetic parameters of CTZ degradation in free form and in complex with β-CD
| Temp. (K) | H2O2 (%) | CTZ | CTZ–β-CD system | t0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetic parameters | ||||
| 353 | 2 | k ± Δk = (7.51± 0.68) × 10−7 (s−1) | k ± Δk = (5.77± 0.61) × 10−7 (s−1) | 4.64 |
| 353 | 3 | k ± Δk = (1.13± 0.12) × 10−6 (s−1) | k ± Δk = (7.32± 0.11) × 10−7 (s−1) | 4.39 |
| 353 | 4 | k ± Δk = (1.36± 0.15) × 10−6 (s−1) | k ± Δk = (9.86± 0.18) × 10−7 (s−1) | 4.02 |
| 353 | 5 | k ± Δk = (1.75± 0.24) × 10−6 (s−1) | k ± Δk = (1.02± 0.33) × 10−6 (s−1) | 4.36 |
t0 parameter of parallelism test
Fig. 5Release profiles at various pH for CTZ, CTZ–β-CD physical mixture and CTZ–β-CD system