| Literature DB >> 30100801 |
Jing Li1, Jiawu Zhou1, Peng Xu1, Xianneng Deng1, Wei Deng1, Mingzhu He2, Ying Yang1, Yu Zhang1, Dayun Tao1.
Abstract
Hybrid sterility between Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima is a main reproduction barrier when transferring the favorable alleles from O. glaberrima to O. sativa and it happens due to allelic interaction at sterility loci. Neutral alleles at each locus have the potential to overcome the sterility between the two cultivated rice species. In this study, an O. sativa cultivar Dianjingyou 1 (DJY1) and its near-isogenic lines (NILs) harboring the single sterility allele S1-glab, S19-glab, S20-glab, S37-glab, S38-glab and S39-glab as the tested lines were crossed with O. glaberrima, O. rufipogon, O. nivara, O. glumaepatula, O. barthii, O. meridionalis and O. sativa so as to detect the neutral alleles of these loci. Pollen fertility was investigated in the paired F1s based on two seasons' result and genotypic segregation was also analyzed in some F2 populations to confirm the results of pollen fertility investigation. The neutral alleles of S38-n and S39-n were identified based upon the pollen fertility and genotypic segregation analysis for the first time. The neutral alleles of sterility loci detected from present report have the potential to know of the nature of interspecific hybrid sterility, and to overcome the interspecific hybrid sterility between O. sativa and O. glaberrima.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza glaberrima; Oryza nivara; allelic variation; hybrid sterility; interspecific hybrid; neutral allele
Year: 2018 PMID: 30100801 PMCID: PMC6081293 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.18006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Pollen fertility (%) of the parents and F1s between test lines and the tested lines in 2012
| Species | Subspecies/Ecotype | Accession | DJY1 (97.8) | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | LSD0.05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aswina (95.9) | 21.7 | 19.5 | 26.2 | 20.0 | 28.9 | 4.1 | ||||
| Tainung 67 (98.0) | 52.2 | 48.9 | 48.8 | 50.7 | 49.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| Azucena (96.5) | 17.7 | 7.9 | 14.4 | 2.6 | ||||||
| Dom Sufid (98.0) | 2.2 | — | 14.8 | 4.8 | 20.7 | 3.3 | ||||
| Dular (90.8) | 94.3 | 43.5 | 47.8 | 25.2 | 41.6 | 48.8 | 37.5 | 1.5 | ||
| Rayada (99.1) | 13.7 | 19.7 | 12.7 | 19.7 | 2.2 | |||||
| IRGC102263 (94.7) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | ||
| IRGC103469 (96.9) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.4 | ||
| Acc.104061 (92.3) | 6.3 | — | 2.7 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 4.0 | ||
| Acc.103812 (93.2) | 74.2 | 39.3 | 25.2 | 20.8 | 44.1 | 41.8 | 40.7 | 5.0 | ||
| Acc.103322 (89.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | ||
| Acc.104085 (87.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | ||
| Acc.80453 (92.7) | 10.8 | 29.0 | 30.5 | 37.2 | — | 4.5 | ||||
| Acc.80696 (94.1) | 40.8 | 23.8 | 23.1 | 7.4 | 21.8 | 22.9 | 22.7 | 2.2 | ||
| Acc.82012 (93.0) | 14.6 | 7.4 | 3.8 | |||||||
| PCR9607 (96.9) | 98.6 | 43.4 | 48.8 | 42.3 | 71.5 | 66.2 | 66.0 | 3.2 |
The pollen fertility of parents (%).
Pollen fertility (%) in the F1s for some test crosses in 2015
| Testcross | Pollen fertility (%) (mean ± SE) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DJY1 × Acc.80453 | 47.9 ± 0.9 | 1.868 | 0.185 |
| NIL ( | 45.3 ± 1.5 | ||
| DJY1 × Acc.82012 | 29.7 ± 1.1 | 2.419 | 0.144 |
| NIL ( | 27.2 ± 0.7 | ||
| DJY1 × Acc.82012 | 29.7 ± 1.1 | 1.572 | 0.216 |
| NIL ( | 24.4 ± 3.1 | ||
| DJY1 × Azucena | 20.5 ± 3.0 | 0.317 | 0.581 |
| NIL ( | 22.4 ± 1.6 | ||
| DJY1 × Rayada | 29.0 ± 1.2 | 0.384 | 0.539 |
| NIL ( | 29.9 ± 1.0 | ||
| DJY1 × Acc.80453 | 47.9 ± 0.9 | 2.846 | 0.114 |
| NIL ( | 43.4 ± 3.6 |
Genotypic distribution of the linked molecular markers and their corresponding pollen and spikelet fertility in the F2 populations
| Testcross | Marker | Genotypes | Number of plants | Pollen fertility (%) (mean ± SE) | Spikelet fertility (%) (mean ± SE) | Chi-squared test for genotypes | Analysis of variance for pollen fertility | Analysis of variance for spikelet fertility | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| X2 value | P value | F value | P value | F value | P value | ||||||
| DJY1 × Rayada | RM8214 | AA | 39 | 63.6 ± 6.3 | 59.6 ± 4.4 | 0.399 | 0.819 | 0.716 | 0.493 | 0.440 | 0.646 |
| AB | 69 | 58.4 ± 6.8 | 55.3 ± 4.2 | ||||||||
| BB | 35 | 71.5 ± 9.1 | 60.8 ± 4.4 | ||||||||
| RM5568 | AA | 32 | 67.4 ± 7.4 | 54.3 ± 4.9 | 0.162 | 0.922 | 0.392 | 0.677 | 0.588 | 0.558 | |
| AB | 69 | 65.4 ± 6.4 | 59.4 ± 3.8 | ||||||||
| BB | 35 | 57.9 ± 8.8 | 61.8 ± 4.9 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| NIL ( | NJ5 | AA | 24 | 60.2 ± 5.4 | 55.0 ± 5.9 | 0.213 | 0.899 | 0.332 | 0.719 | 0.545 | 0.583 |
| AB | 44 | 51.5 ± 7.6 | 56.5 ± 4.3 | ||||||||
| BB | 21 | 56.0 ± 11.2 | 48.8 ± 6.9 | ||||||||
| RM5568 | AA | 23 | 60.9 ± 5.1 | 56.5 ± 5.7 | 0.121 | 0.941 | 0.764 | 0.472 | 1.035 | 0.362 | |
| AB | 44 | 48.6 ± 7.5 | 55.8 ± 4.3 | ||||||||
| BB | 24 | 50.6 ± 9.5 | 46.0 ± 7.0 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| DJY1 × Acc.80453 | RM6371 | AA | 18 | 72.2 ± 9.8 | — | 1.700 | 0.427 | 1.082 | 0.349 | ||
| AB | 25 | 64.8 ± 8.5 | — | ||||||||
| BB | 17 | 83.7 ± 8.6 | — | ||||||||
| RM5568 | AA | 15 | 72.1 ± 5.2 | — | 1.000 | 0.607 | 0.267 | 0.979 | |||
| AB | 25 | 62.9 ± 8.8 | — | ||||||||
| BB | 17 | 84.6 ± 7.9 | — | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| NIL ( | RM6371 | AA | 12 | 72.0 ± 11.3 | — | 0.679 | 0.712 | 0.169 | 0.846 | ||
| AB | 31 | 66.7 ± 6.8 | — | ||||||||
| BB | 13 | 73.5 ± 10.3 | — | ||||||||
| RM8214 | AA | 12 | 80.6 ± 10.0 | — | 0.125 | 0.939 | 0.518 | 0.602 | |||
| AB | 25 | 65.1 ± 8.0 | — | ||||||||
| BB | 11 | 67.4 ± 13.5 | — | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| DJY1 × Acc.82012 | RM16260 | AA | 18 | 81.4 ± 7.0 | 53.1 ± 8.0 | 1.277 | 0.528 | 1.967 | 0.153 | 0.486 | 0.621 |
| AB | 28 | 61.0 ± 6.7 | 57.4 ± 6.1 | ||||||||
| BB | 19 | 73.2 ± 6.5 | 49.1 ± 5.6 | ||||||||
| W-9 | AA | 22 | 83.6 ± 5.7 | 52.1 ± 6.2 | 1.886 | 0.390 | 2.378 | 0.105 | 1.417 | 0.256 | |
| AB | 30 | 61.8 ± 6.3 | 59.8 ± 4.3 | ||||||||
| BB | 18 | 70.5 ± 6.7 | 48.3 ± 5.6 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| NIL ( | RM16335 | AA | 14 | 78.7 ± 17.0 | 37.5 ± 23.8 | 1.636 | 0.441 | 0.613 | 0.556 | 0.118 | 0.889 |
| AB | 22 | 53.8 ± 16.5 | 43.9 ± 5.2 | ||||||||
| BB | 8 | 56.1 ± 13.8 | 45.2 ± 8.7 | ||||||||
| W-9 | AA | 16 | 56.1 ± 13.8 | 45.6 ± 8.7 | 2.640 | 0.267 | 0.017 | 0.983 | 0.834 | 0.445 | |
| AB | 26 | 58.2 ± 13.2 | 38.7 ± 5.1 | ||||||||
| BB | 8 | 60.3 ± 19.9 | 54.2 ± 11.7 | ||||||||
AA symbols the genotype of homozygote of test lines, AB symbols the genotype of heterozygote and BB symbols the genotype of homozygote of tested lines.
The allelic variation degree at the six hybrid sterility loci in 11 tested lines
| Species | Subspecies/Ecotype | Accession | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( | NIL ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aswina | −0.0023 | −0.5017 | −0.5524 | −0.4000 | −0.5425 | −0.3376 | ||
| Tainung 67 | −0.4712 | −0.5048 | −0.5052 | −0.0222 | −0.4857 | −0.5032 | ||
| Azucena | 0.0029 | −0.1563 | −0.6260 | 0.0519 | −0.3144 | 0.6608 | ||
| Dom Sufid | −0.9140 | − | −0.4090 | −0.8096 | 0.2162 | −0.1744 | ||
| Dular | −0.5385 | −0.4928 | −0.7329 | −0.5623 | −0.4828 | −0.6021 | ||
| Rayada | −0.5215 | −0.3146 | −0.5588 | −0.6704 | −0.3132 | 0.0750 | ||
| Acc.103812 | −0.4710 | −0.6608 | −0.7203 | −0.4054 | −0.4376 | −0.4518 | ||
| Acc.80453 | 0.0811 | −0.7619 | −0.3595 | −0.3261 | −0.1786 | − | ||
| Acc.80696 | −0.4168 | −0.4335 | −0.8199 | −0.4663 | −0.4389 | −0.4430 | ||
| Acc.82012 | −0.4893 | −0.7405 | −0.0915 | 0.2522 | 0.0901 | 0.6395 | ||
| PCR9607 | −0.5596 | −0.5050 | −0.5711 | −0.2751 | −0.3289 | −0.3310 | ||
| LSD0.05 | 0.1162 |
Fig. 1The allelic variation degree at six hybrid sterility loci among 11 tested lines. The horizontal axis was divided into six loci and each locus represents a different sterility locus from Oryza glaberrima. The allelic variation degree of 11 tested lines were divided into three groups at S1 locus, disperse from −0.1563 to −0.7619 at S19 locus, two groups at S20 locus; but more than three groups were observed at S37(t), S38(t) and S39(t) loci.