Literature DB >> 30100664

Natural Disasters, Social Protection, and Risk Perceptions.

Philip Brown1, Adam Daigneault2, Emilia Tjernström3, Wenbo Zou4.   

Abstract

Natural disasters give rise to loss and damage and may affect subjective expectations about the prevalence and severity of future disasters. These expectations might then in turn shape individuals' investment behaviors, potentially affecting their incomes in subsequent years. As part of an emerging literature on endogenous preferences, economists have begun studying the consequences that exposure to natural disasters have on risk attitudes, perceptions, and behavior. We add to this field by studying the impact of being struck by the December 2012 Cyclone Evan on Fijian households' risk attitudes and subjective expectations about the likelihood and severity of natural disasters over the next 20 years. The randomness of the cyclone's path allows us to estimate the causal effects of exposure on both risk attitudes and risk perceptions. Our results show that being struck by an extreme event substantially changes individuals' risk perceptions as well as their beliefs about the frequency and magnitude of future shocks. However, we find sharply distinct results for the two ethnicities in our sample, indigenous Fijians and Indo-Fijians; the impact of the natural disaster aligns with previous results in the literature on risk attitudes and risk perceptions for Indo-Fijians, whereas they have little to no impact on those same measures for indigenous Fijians. To provide welfare implications for our results, we compare households' risk perceptions to climate and hydrological models of future disaster risk, and find that both ethnic groups over-infer the risk of future disasters relative to the model predictions. If such distorted beliefs encourage over-investment in preventative measures at the cost of other productive investments, these biases could have negative welfare impacts. Understanding belief biases and how they vary across social contexts may thus help decision makers design policy instruments to reduce such inefficiencies, particularly in the face of climate change.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30100664      PMCID: PMC6086387          DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Dev        ISSN: 0305-750X


  10 in total

1.  Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry.

Authors:  J Baron; J C Hershey; H Kunreuther
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Perception of earthquake risk in Taiwan: effects of gender and past earthquake experience.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Kung; Sue-Huei Chen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Flooding risks: a comparison of lay people's perceptions and expert's assessments in Switzerland.

Authors:  Michael Siegrist; Heinz Gutscher
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?

Authors:  Ming-Chou Ho; Daigee Shaw; Shuyeu Lin; Yao-Chu Chiu
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Control, uncertainty, and expectations for the future: a qualitative study of the impact of drought on a rural Australian community.

Authors:  G-M Sartore; B Kelly; H Stain; G Albrecht; N Higginbotham
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cross-cultural and site-based influences on demographic, well-being, and social network predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico: predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico.

Authors:  Eric C Jones; Albert J Faas; Arthur D Murphy; Graham A Tobin; Linda M Whiteford; Christopher McCarty
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  Emotion and decision making.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lerner; Ye Li; Piercarlo Valdesolo; Karim S Kassam
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Stability of Experimental and Survey Measures of Risk, Time, and Social Preferences: A Review and Some New Results.

Authors:  Yating Chuang; Laura Schechter
Journal:  J Dev Econ       Date:  2015-08-19
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender.

Authors:  Lata Gangadharan; Tarun Jain; Pushkar Maitra; Joe Vecci
Journal:  Jpn Econ Rev (Oxf)       Date:  2021-08-20

2.  A study on the relationships of place attachment and individual attributes of residents in different vulnerable districts in Taipei, Taiwan.

Authors:  Yung-Jaan Lee; Shih-Ying Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mechanism of WeChat's Impact on Public Risk Perception During COVID-19.

Authors:  Yue Zhuang; Tiantian Zhao; Xuanrong Shao
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Public perception and attitudes to disaster risks in a coastal metropolis of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ali M AlQahtany; Ismaila Rimi Abubakar
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.320

5.  Evaluation of Disaster Medicine Preparedness among Healthcare Profession Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Pakistan.

Authors:  Ali Hassan Gillani; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim; Jamshaid Akbar; Yu Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.