Literature DB >> 30100320

Effect of remote myofascial release on hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals - A randomized clinical trial.

Durga Girish Joshi1, Ganesh Balthillaya1, Anupama Prabhu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The existence of continuity between fascia and muscles that may be anatomically distant from each other is emphasized in the tensegrity principle. Despite evidence from in vitro studies, there is a dearth of literature concerning the in vivo behavior of these connections. AIM: To compare the effect of Static Stretching (SS) of hamstrings with remote Myofascial Release (MFR) (bilateral plantar fascia and suboccipital region) and a combination of SS and remote MFR on hamstring flexibility. The secondary aim of this study was to investigate the difference between therapist administered and self-administered interventions.
DESIGN: Three arm assessor-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight asymptomatic participants (16 Males; Mean age 22.69 ± 2.65 years).
METHOD: Participants with tight hamstrings defined by a passive Knee Extension Angle (KEA) > 20° were included in the study and were assigned to one of the three groups. Group A (n = 19) was SS, group B (n = 20) was remote MFR, group C (n = 19) was a combination group who received both SS and remote MFR. Seven sessions of therapist administered intervention were delivered over a period of 10 days, which was followed by a 2-week self-administered home program. KEA and Sit and Reach Test (SRT) were used as outcomes and measurements were performed at baseline, end of the seventh session and after atwo-week follow-up.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that hamstring flexibility improved in all three groups after therapist administered interventions (p < 0.05), whereas, group C demonstrated additional benefits. None of the groups showed a statistically significant (p > 0.05) change in the KEA with self-intervention.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that all three interventions were effective in improving hamstring flexibility in young asymptomatic individuals when performed by the therapist.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fascia; Plantar fascia; Suboccipital; Superficial Back Line

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30100320     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther        ISSN: 1360-8592


  5 in total

Review 1.  Do Self-Myofascial Release Devices Release Myofascia? Rolling Mechanisms: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  David G Behm; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Does Self-Myofascial Release Cause a Remote Hamstring Stretching Effect Based on Myofascial Chains? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Paul Fauris; Carlos López-de-Celis; Max Canet-Vintró; Juan Carlos Martin; Luis Llurda-Almuzara; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Noé Labata-Lezaun; Mathias Simon; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Effects of the Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition Technique on the Range of Motion of the Ankle Joint and Balance According to Its Application Duration: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Han-Sol Kang; Hyung-Wook Kwon; Di-Gud Kim; Kwang-Rak Park; Suk-Chan Hahm; Jeong-Hyun Park
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 4.  The Five Diaphragms in Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine: Myofascial Relationships, Part 1.

Authors:  Bruno Bordoni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Ankle Motion Is Associated With Soft Tissue Displacement in the Dorsal Thigh: An in vivo Investigation Suggesting Myofascial Force Transmission Across the Knee Joint.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Heloise Debelle; Sarah Tenberg; Andrew Dilley; Constantinos Maganaris
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.