Literature DB >> 30100219

The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults - A systematic review of in vivo studies.

Fumin Pan1, Ali Firouzabadi1, Sandra Reitmaier1, Thomas Zander1, Hendrik Schmidt2.   

Abstract

A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions. After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1-12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8-12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1-4) and middle (T4-8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4-8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6-12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vivo; Kinematics; Kyphosis; Range of motion; Review; Thoracic spine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30100219     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Is T9-11 the true thoracolumbar transition zone?

Authors:  J Murphy; E McLoughlin; A M Davies; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-10

2.  Clinical phenotypes based on clinical prognostic factors in patients with secondary hip osteoarthritis: preliminary findings from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroshige Tateuchi; Haruhiko Akiyama; Koji Goto; Kazutaka So; Yutaka Kuroda; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Perioperative Predictive Factors for Positive Outcomes in Spine Fusion for Adult Deformity Correction.

Authors:  Alice Baroncini; Filippo Migliorini; Francesco Langella; Paolo Barletta; Per Trobisch; Riccardo Cecchinato; Marco Damilano; Emanuele Quarto; Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Differences in spinal posture and mobility between children/adolescents with obesity and age-matched normal-weight individuals.

Authors:  M E Bayartai; C E Schaer; Hannu Luomajoki; G Tringali; R De Micheli; A Sartorio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The correlations between the anchor density and the curve correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Yeh; Chi-Chien Niu; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.