Literature DB >> 30099849

Assessing rabies knowledge gaps in human and animal healthcare professionals practicing in Washington, DC-A one health approach.

Andrew K Hennenfent1, Preetha Iyengar1, John Davies-Cole1.   

Abstract

Once a person is exposed to the rabies virus, it is universally fatal unless postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is administered promptly. In the United States, determining whether PEP recommeded is often a collaborative effort where health departments work with both animal and human healthcare professionals to enact animal quarantines (or rabies testing), recommending PEP when appropriate. A failure in the knowledge base of either profession can result in incorrect PEP recommendations and an increased risk of adverse outcomes. To assess rabies knowledge in licensed physicians and veterinarians practicing in Washington, DC, we conducted a survey from December 2, 2016, to January 2, 2017, assessing their knowledge of the clinical signs, epidemiology and the primary vectors of rabies. These responses were compared between the two groups. Physician-specific or veterinary-specific questions regarding the correct PEP schedule and administration site or animal quarantine recommendations, respectively, were also included. Nine hundred and fifty-two physicians and 125 veterinarians responded. Veterinarians were more likely to select the correct vectors and clinical signs in animals than physicians. Physicians more likely selected the correct transmission routes. Less than half of physicians identified the correct PEP schedule (39.4%) and administration site (49.0%). Half of veterinarians (50.0%) correctly identified quarantine length for wildlife-exposed vaccinated dogs compared to only 19.4% for unvaccinated dogs. Several knowledge gaps were identified amongst physicians and veterinarians. Due to the fatal nature of rabies, it is important that all healthcare providers have an understanding of current recommendations. Health departments can work to correct these gaps and serve as a bridge between human and animal healthcare professionals.
© 2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  one health; physicians; postexposure prophylaxis; rabies; veterinarians; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099849     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  4 in total

1.  Factors Limiting the Appropriate Use of Rabies Post-exposure Prophylaxis by Health Professionals in Brazil.

Authors:  Ramiro M da Silva; Jane Megid; Katie Hampson; Aline Alves Scarpellini Campos; Cintia S Higashi; Fabíola S Medeiros; Alexandra S Pereira; Julio A Benavides
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Beliefs, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Australian Veterinary Students Regarding One Health and Zoonosis Management.

Authors:  Ihab Habib; Lucinda Lam; Hamid Reza Sodagari; Pete Irons; Mieghan Bruce
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  What makes an effective One Health clinical practitioner? Opinions of Australian One Health experts.

Authors:  Sandra G Steele; Jenny-Ann Toribio; Robert Booy; Siobhan M Mor
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2019-10-17

4.  Towards One Health clinical management of zoonoses: A parallel survey of Australian general medical practitioners and veterinarians.

Authors:  Sandra G Steele; Robert Booy; Ramesh Manocha; Siobhan M Mor; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.702

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.