Literature DB >> 30099733

Limb Salvage and Functional Outcomes following Free Tissue Transfer for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Jocelyn Lu1, Michael V DeFazio2, Chrisovalantis Lakhiani2, Michel Abboud1, Morgan Penzler1, Tammer Elmarsafi2, Paul J Kim1, Christopher E Attinger2, Karen K Evans2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence documenting high success rates following microvascular diabetic foot reconstruction has led to a paradigm shift in favor of more aggressive limb preservation. The primary aim of this study was to examine reconstructive and functional outcomes in patients who underwent free tissue transfer (FTT) for recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) at our tertiary referral center for advanced limb salvage.
METHODS: Between June 2013 and June 2016, 29 patients underwent lower extremity FTT for diabetic foot reconstruction by the senior author (K.K.E.). In all cases, microsurgical reconstruction was offered as an alternative to major amputation for the management of recalcitrant DFUs. Overall rates of flap survival, limb salvage, and postoperative ambulation were evaluated. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) score was used to assess functional outcomes after surgery.
RESULTS: Overall rates of flap success and lower limb salvage were 93 and 79%, respectively. Flap failure occurred in two patients with delayed microvascular compromise. Seven patients in this series ultimately required below-knee amputation secondary to recalcitrant infection (n = 5), intractable pain (n = 1), and limb ischemia (n = 1). The average interval between FTT and major amputation was 8 months (r, 0.2-15 months). Postoperative ambulation was confirmed in 25 patients (86%) after a mean final follow-up of 25 months (r, 10-48 months). The average LEFS score for all patients was 46 out of 80 points (r, 12-80 points), indicating the ability to ambulate in the community with some limitations.
CONCLUSION: FTT for the management of recalcitrant DFUs is associated with high rates of reconstructive success and postoperative ambulation. However, several patients will eventually require major amputation for reasons unrelated to ultimate flap survival. These data should be used to counsel patients regarding the risks, functional implications, and prognosis of microvascular diabetic foot reconstruction. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099733     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  4 in total

1.  [Application of free anterolateral thigh flap with fascia lata for diabetic foot ulcers with bone exposure].

Authors:  Xiaobing Li; Hongjun Liu; Chao Yang; Aibing Xiong; Xiaochuan He; Xinli Tian; Ying Li; Ruqian Yang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-01-15

2.  Surgical strategies for prevention of amputation of the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Robert G Frykberg; Christopher Attinger; Luuk Smeets; Armin Koller; Arun Bal; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  Achieving Functional Outcomes after Surgical Management of Catastrophic Vasopressor-induced Limb Ischemia.

Authors:  Romina Deldar; Areeg A Abu El Hawa; Zoe K Haffner; James P Higgins; Ryan D Katz; Christopher E Attinger; Karen K Evans
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Kozak; Jesse Y Hsu; Robyn B Broach; Sameer Shakir; Catherine Calvert; John T Stranix; Charles Messa; L Scott Levin; Joseph M Serletti; Stephen J Kovach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.