Literature DB >> 30099670

Minimally invasive spinal decompression surgery in diabetic patients: perioperative risks, complications and clinical outcomes compared with non-diabetic patients' cohort.

G J Regev1,2, R Lador3,4, K Salame3,4, L Mangel3,4, A Cohen3,4, Z Lidar3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have documented an increased complication rate in diabetic patients undergoing spinal surgery. However, the impact of diabetes on the risk of postoperative complications and clinical outcome following minimally invasive spinal (MIS) decompression is not well understood.
OBJECTIVES: To compare complication rates and outcomes of MIS decompression in diabetic patients with a cohort of non-diabetic patients undergoing similar procedures.
METHODS: Medical records of 48 patients with diabetes and 151 control patients that underwent minimally invasive lumbar decompression between April 2009 and July 2014 at our institute were reviewed and compared. Past medical history, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, perioperative mortality, complication and revision surgeries rates were analyzed. Patient outcomes included: the visual analog scale and the EQ-5D scores.
RESULTS: The mean age was 68.58 ± 11 years in the diabetic group and 51.7 ± 17.7 years in the control group. No major postoperative complications were recorded in either group. Both groups were statistically equivalent in their postoperative length of stay, minor complications and revision rates. Both groups showed significant improvement in their outcome scores following surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that minimally invasive decompressive surgery is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic patients and does not pose an increased risk of complications. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate the specific advantages of the minimally invasive techniques in the diabetic population. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Diabetes mellitus; Minimally invasive; Spinal decompression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099670     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5716-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for the development of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yoram Anekstein; Yossi Smorgick; Raphael Lotan; Gabriel Agar; Ehud Shalmon; Yizhar Floman; Yigal Mirovsky
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome.

Authors:  U Wolters; T Wolf; H Stützer; T Schröder
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Perioperative hemoglobin A1c as a predictor of deep infection following single-level lumbar decompression in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Jourdan M Cancienne; Brian C Werner; Dennis Q Chen; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Adam L Shimer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  A Comparison of Different Minimally Invasive and Open Posterior Spinal Procedures Using Volumetric Measurements of the Surgical Exposures.

Authors:  Gilad J Regev; Choll W Kim; Khalil Salame; Eyal Behrbalk; Ory Keynan; Ran Lador; Laurence Mangel; Zvi Lidar
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 6.  Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Mohammad R Rasouli; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Farhad Shokraneh; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Roger Chou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-04

7.  Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  James A Browne; Chad Cook; Ricardo Pietrobon; M Angelyn Bethel; William J Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Diabetes Is Related to Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years Following Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sheyan J Armaghani; Kristin R Archer; RenaClayton Rolfe; David N Demaio; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.

Authors:  M Rahman; L E Summers; B Richter; R I Mimran; R P Jacob
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2008-04

10.  Diabetes Mellitus, a New Risk Factor for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Leila Asadian; Kaveh Haddadi; Mohsen Aarabi; Amirhossein Zare
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2016-05-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Subsidence induced recurrent radiculopathy after staged two-level standalone endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a threaded cylindrical cage: a case report.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Nicholas A Ransom; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

2.  Standalone lordotic endoscopic wedge lumbar interbody fusion (LEW-LIF™) with a threaded cylindrical peek cage: report of two cases.

Authors:  Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Álvaro Silva Ardila; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Jefferson Infante; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.