Literature DB >> 30098672

Estimating Future Health Technology Diffusion Using Expert Beliefs Calibrated to an Established Diffusion Model.

Sabine E Grimm1, John W Stevens2, Simon Dixon2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Estimates of future health technology diffusion, or future uptake over time, are a requirement for different analyses performed within health technology assessments. Methods for obtaining such estimates include constant uptake estimates based on expert opinion or analogous technologies and on extrapolation from initial data points using parametric curves-but remain divorced from established diffusion theory and modeling. We propose an approach to obtaining diffusion estimates using experts' beliefs calibrated to an established diffusion model to address this methodologic gap.
METHODS: We performed an elicitation of experts' beliefs on future diffusion of a new preterm birth screening illustrative case study technology. The elicited quantities were chosen such that they could be calibrated to yield the parameters of the Bass model of new product growth, which was chosen based on a review of the diffusion literature.
RESULTS: With the elicitation of only three quantities per diffusion curve, our approach enabled us to quantify uncertainty about diffusion of the new technology in different scenarios. Pooled results showed that the attainable number of adoptions was predicted to be relatively low compared with what was thought possible. Further research evidence improved the attainable number of adoptions only slightly but resulted in greater speed of diffusion.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach of eliciting experts' beliefs about diffusion and informing the Bass model has the potential to fill the methodologic gap evident in value of implementation and research, as well as budget impact and some cost-effectiveness analyses.
Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  budget impact analysis; cost effectiveness; diffusion of innovations; elicitation; value of information

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30098672     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

1.  Early budget impact analysis on magnetic seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Melanie Lindenberg; Anne van Beek; Valesca Retèl; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Wim van Harten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Subcategorizing the Expected Value of Perfect Implementation to Identify When and Where to Invest in Implementation Initiatives.

Authors:  Kasper Johannesen; Magnus Janzon; Tomas Jernberg; Martin Henriksson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in China During the Past 10 Years: Consecutive Survey Data Analysis and Comparison of Sino-American Challenges and Experiences.

Authors:  Jun Liang; Ying Li; Zhongan Zhang; Dongxia Shen; Jie Xu; Xu Zheng; Tong Wang; Buzhou Tang; Jianbo Lei; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Implementation Science: a Research Agenda and Call for Wider Application.

Authors:  Emanuel Krebs; Bohdan Nosyk
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 5.495

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.