Literature DB >> 30097968

Technical Aspects of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation-a Survey-Based Study Within the Eurotransplant, Swisstransplant, Scandiatransplant, and British Transplantation Society Networks.

Zoltan Czigany1, Marcus N Scherer2, Johann Pratschke3, Markus Guba4, Silvio Nadalin5, Arianeb Mehrabi6, Gabriela Berlakovich7, Xavier Rogiers8, Jacques Pirenne9, Jan Lerut10, Zoltan Mathe11, Philipp Dutkowski12, Bo-Göran Ericzon13, Massimo Malagó14, Nigel Heaton15, Wenzel Schöning1, Jan Bednarsch1, Ulf Peter Neumann1, Georg Lurje16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has emerged as the mainstay of treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, technical aspects of OLT are still subject of ongoing debate and are widely based on personal experience and local institutional protocols.
METHODS: An international online survey was sent out to all liver transplant centers (n = 52) within the Eurotransplant, Swisstransplant, Scandiatransplant, and British Transplant Society networks. The survey sought information on center-specific OLT caseload, vascular and biliary reconstruction, graft reperfusion, intraoperative control of hemodynamics, and drain policies.
RESULTS: Forty-two centers gave a valid response (81%). Out of these, 50% reported piggy-back and 40.5% total caval replacement as their standard technique. While 48% of all centers generally do not apply veno-venous bypass (vvBP) or temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) during OLT, vvBP/PCS are routinely used in six centers (14%). Portal vein first reperfusion is used in 64%, followed by simultaneous (17%), and retrograde reperfusion (12%). End-to-end duct-to-duct anastomosis without biliary drain (67%) is the most frequently performed method of biliary reconstruction. No significant associations were found between the center caseload and the surgical approach used. The predominant part of the centers (88%) stated that techniques of OLT are not evidence-based and 98% would participate in multicenter clinical trials on these topics.
CONCLUSION: Technical aspects of OLT vary widely among European centers. The extent to which center-specific variation of techniques affect transplant outcomes in Europe should be elucidated further in prospective multicenter trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal drain; Liver transplantation; Piggy-back; Reperfusion; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30097968     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3915-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

1.  Hepato-venous reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the recipients' inferior vena cava and veno-venous bypass.

Authors:  U J Hesse; F Berrevoet; R Troisi; P Pattyn; E Mortier; J Decruyenaere; B de Hemptinne
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  A new technique of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic hepatic transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion.

Authors:  J Belghiti; Y Panis; A Sauvanet; B Gayet; F Fékété
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-09

Review 3.  Themes of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; John J Fung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Henrik Petrowsky; Nicolas Demartines; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The sequence of revascularization in liver transplantation: it does make a difference.

Authors:  Wojciech G Polak; Robert J Porte
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 6.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Retrograde reperfusion via vena cava lowers the risk of initial nonfunction but increases the risk of ischemic-type biliary lesions in liver transplantation--a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Christoph Heidenhain; Michael Heise; Sven Jonas; Manuela Ben-Asseur; Gero Puhl; Jens Mittler; Armin Thelen; Sven Schmidt; Jan Langrehr; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Venous outflow reconstructions with the piggyback technique in liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 431 cases.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Gian Luca Grazi; Giovanni Varotti; Matteo Ravaioli; Giorgio Ercolani; Andrea Gardini; Antonino Cavallari
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  A single-center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti.

Authors:  Arianeb Mehrabi; Zhoobin A Mood; Hamidreza Fonouni; Arash Kashfi; Norbert Hillebrand; Sascha A Müller; Jens Encke; Markus W Büchler; Jan Schmidt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  A survey of CMV prevention strategies after liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Levitsky; N Singh; M M Wagener; V Stosor; M Abecassis; M G Ison
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The technical aspects of ex vivo hepatectomy with autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Baimas-George; Kyle J Thompson; Michael D Watson; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; David Levi; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Joerg Boecker; Zoltan Czigany; Jan Bednarsch; Iakovos Amygdalos; Franziska Meister; Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Wen-Jia Liu; Pavel Strnad; Ulf Peter Neumann; Georg Lurje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Dual Protective Effect of Intestinal Remote Ischemic Conditioning in a Rat Model of Total Hepatic Ischemia.

Authors:  Zoltan Czigany; Koichiro Hata; Wei Lai; Timo Schwandt; Yuzo Yamamoto; Shinji Uemoto; Rene H Tolba
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Adenosine A2a Receptor Stimulation Attenuates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Improves Survival in A Porcine Model of DCD Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Zoltan Czigany; Eve Christiana Craigie; Georg Lurje; Shaowei Song; Kei Yonezawa; Yuzo Yamamoto; Thomas Minor; René Hany Tolba
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  An Italian survey on the use of T-tube in liver transplantation: old habits die hard!

Authors:  Riccardo Pravisani; Paolo De Simone; Damiano Patrono; Andrea Lauterio; Matteo Cescon; Enrico Gringeri; Michele Colledan; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Fabrizio di Francesco; Barbara Antonelli; Tommaso Maria Manzia; Amedeo Carraro; Marco Vivarelli; Enrico Regalia; Giovanni Vennarecci; Nicola Guglielmo; Manuela Cesaretti; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio; Maria Filippa Valentini; Quirino Lai; Umberto Baccarani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.