Zoltan Czigany1, Marcus N Scherer2, Johann Pratschke3, Markus Guba4, Silvio Nadalin5, Arianeb Mehrabi6, Gabriela Berlakovich7, Xavier Rogiers8, Jacques Pirenne9, Jan Lerut10, Zoltan Mathe11, Philipp Dutkowski12, Bo-Göran Ericzon13, Massimo Malagó14, Nigel Heaton15, Wenzel Schöning1, Jan Bednarsch1, Ulf Peter Neumann1, Georg Lurje16. 1. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany. 2. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Berlin - Charité, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. 6. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 8. Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Gent, Ghent, Belgium. 9. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 10. Unit of Liver Transplantation and General Surgery, University Hospitals St.-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 11. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 12. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 13. Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Stockholm - Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 14. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK. 15. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, King's College Hospital, London, UK. 16. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany. glurje@ukaachen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has emerged as the mainstay of treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, technical aspects of OLT are still subject of ongoing debate and are widely based on personal experience and local institutional protocols. METHODS: An international online survey was sent out to all liver transplant centers (n = 52) within the Eurotransplant, Swisstransplant, Scandiatransplant, and British Transplant Society networks. The survey sought information on center-specific OLT caseload, vascular and biliary reconstruction, graft reperfusion, intraoperative control of hemodynamics, and drain policies. RESULTS: Forty-two centers gave a valid response (81%). Out of these, 50% reported piggy-back and 40.5% total caval replacement as their standard technique. While 48% of all centers generally do not apply veno-venous bypass (vvBP) or temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) during OLT, vvBP/PCS are routinely used in six centers (14%). Portal vein first reperfusion is used in 64%, followed by simultaneous (17%), and retrograde reperfusion (12%). End-to-end duct-to-duct anastomosis without biliary drain (67%) is the most frequently performed method of biliary reconstruction. No significant associations were found between the center caseload and the surgical approach used. The predominant part of the centers (88%) stated that techniques of OLT are not evidence-based and 98% would participate in multicenter clinical trials on these topics. CONCLUSION: Technical aspects of OLT vary widely among European centers. The extent to which center-specific variation of techniques affect transplant outcomes in Europe should be elucidated further in prospective multicenter trials.
BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has emerged as the mainstay of treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, technical aspects of OLT are still subject of ongoing debate and are widely based on personal experience and local institutional protocols. METHODS: An international online survey was sent out to all liver transplant centers (n = 52) within the Eurotransplant, Swisstransplant, Scandiatransplant, and British Transplant Society networks. The survey sought information on center-specific OLT caseload, vascular and biliary reconstruction, graft reperfusion, intraoperative control of hemodynamics, and drain policies. RESULTS: Forty-two centers gave a valid response (81%). Out of these, 50% reported piggy-back and 40.5% total caval replacement as their standard technique. While 48% of all centers generally do not apply veno-venous bypass (vvBP) or temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) during OLT, vvBP/PCS are routinely used in six centers (14%). Portal vein first reperfusion is used in 64%, followed by simultaneous (17%), and retrograde reperfusion (12%). End-to-end duct-to-duct anastomosis without biliary drain (67%) is the most frequently performed method of biliary reconstruction. No significant associations were found between the center caseload and the surgical approach used. The predominant part of the centers (88%) stated that techniques of OLT are not evidence-based and 98% would participate in multicenter clinical trials on these topics. CONCLUSION: Technical aspects of OLT vary widely among European centers. The extent to which center-specific variation of techniques affect transplant outcomes in Europe should be elucidated further in prospective multicenter trials.
Authors: U J Hesse; F Berrevoet; R Troisi; P Pattyn; E Mortier; J Decruyenaere; B de Hemptinne Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Christoph Heidenhain; Michael Heise; Sven Jonas; Manuela Ben-Asseur; Gero Puhl; Jens Mittler; Armin Thelen; Sven Schmidt; Jan Langrehr; Peter Neuhaus Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Matteo Cescon; Gian Luca Grazi; Giovanni Varotti; Matteo Ravaioli; Giorgio Ercolani; Andrea Gardini; Antonino Cavallari Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Maria Baimas-George; Kyle J Thompson; Michael D Watson; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; David Levi; Dionisios Vrochides Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Joerg Boecker; Zoltan Czigany; Jan Bednarsch; Iakovos Amygdalos; Franziska Meister; Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Wen-Jia Liu; Pavel Strnad; Ulf Peter Neumann; Georg Lurje Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zoltan Czigany; Eve Christiana Craigie; Georg Lurje; Shaowei Song; Kei Yonezawa; Yuzo Yamamoto; Thomas Minor; René Hany Tolba Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Riccardo Pravisani; Paolo De Simone; Damiano Patrono; Andrea Lauterio; Matteo Cescon; Enrico Gringeri; Michele Colledan; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Fabrizio di Francesco; Barbara Antonelli; Tommaso Maria Manzia; Amedeo Carraro; Marco Vivarelli; Enrico Regalia; Giovanni Vennarecci; Nicola Guglielmo; Manuela Cesaretti; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio; Maria Filippa Valentini; Quirino Lai; Umberto Baccarani Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2021-04-01