Literature DB >> 30097230

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vincenzo Di Nunno1, Emmanuele De Luca2, Consuelo Buttigliero3, Marcello Tucci3, Francesca Vignani2, Lidia Gatto1, Clizia Zichi2, Andrea Ardizzoni1, Massimo Di Maio2, Francesco Massari4.   

Abstract

Immunotherapy represents a new hope for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, to date, only one of two randomized studies showed a clear survival advantage with these treatments. Aimed to investigate the role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with platinum progressed metastatic UC we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and activity, in terms of Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR). Immune checkpoint inhibitors have showed to improve OS compared to chemotherapy in unselected patients (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93, p = 0.003), while the difference was not significant in patients selected for PD-L1 expression (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.09, p = 0.12). Pooled probability of response was 0.18 (95% CI 0.16-0.20) in unselected patients and 0.27 (95% CI 0.25-0.32) in PD-L1 selected patients. Immunotherapy results in a significant survival advantage in PD-L1 unselected patients suggesting that PD-L1 expression may not be a reliable marker in previously platinum treated patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune-checkpoint inhibitors; Meta-analysis; Metastatic urothelial carcinoma; PD-1; PD-L1; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30097230     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  8 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association/Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada consensus statement: Management of unresectable locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Mark Warren; Michael Kolinsky; Christina M Canil; Piotr Czaykowski; Srikala S Sridhar; Peter C Black; Christopher M Booth; Wassim Kassouf; Libni Eapen; Som D Mukherjee; Normand Blais; Bernhard J Eigl; Eric Winquist; Naveen S Basappa; Scott A North
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Clinicopathological and prognostic value of PD-L1 in urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiangli Ding; Qiaochao Chen; Zhao Yang; Jun Li; Hui Zhan; Nihong Lu; Min Chen; Yanlong Yang; Jiansong Wang; Delin Yang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Regimens in Advanced or Metastatic Bladder and Urothelial Carcinomas: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Chen Qu; Yan Huang; Zhong-Yi Mu; Hang Lv; Qing-Peng Xie; Kai Wang; Bin Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in PD-L1 selected or unselected patients vs. control group in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Lifang Guo; Xin Wang; Shihui Wang; Linbin Hua; Nan Song; Bin Hu; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Safety and Activity of Programmed Cell Death 1 Versus Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors for Platinum-Resistant Urothelial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Zaishang Li; Xueying Li; Wayne Lam; Yabing Cao; Hui Han; Xueqi Zhang; Jiequn Fang; Kefeng Xiao; Fangjian Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Programmed Death 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Advanced and Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Single-Agent Studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Tafuri; David D Smith; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Sarah Cole; Aliasger Shakir; Sarmad Sadeghi; Nicholas J Vogelzang; David Quinn; Parkash S Gill; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.121

7.  Second-line treatment strategy for urothelial cancer patients who progress or are unfit for cisplatin therapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huitao Wang; Jianhe Liu; Kewei Fang; Changxing Ke; Yongming Jiang; Guang Wang; Tongxin Yang; Tao Chen; Xin Shi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Treatment Sequencing Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Treated in the Community Practice Setting in the United States: SPEAR-Bladder (Study informing treatment Pathway dEcision in bladder cAnceR).

Authors:  Gurjyot K Doshi; Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; Mairead Kearney; Murtuza Bharmal; Paul Cislo; Ruth Kim; Marley Boyd; Kathleen M Aguilar; Hemant Phatak
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-11-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.