Ken Johkura1, Yosuke Kudo2, Eriko Sugawara2, Kosuke Watanabe2, Tomoki Nakamizo2, Masahiro Yamamoto2, Kazumitsu Amari3, Koji Takahashi4, Osamu Tanaka4. 1. Department of Neurology, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, Yokohama, Japan. Electronic address: ke00-johkura@city.yokohama.jp. 2. Department of Neurology, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, Yokohama, Japan. 3. Department of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, Yokohama, Japan. 4. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lateral medullary infarction (LMI) sometimes causes long-lasting dizziness. Although the precise mechanism of chronic post-LMI dizziness is unknown, a cerebellar control disorder of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) has been reported in such patients. We conducted a proof-of-principle cohort study to assess the potential efficacy of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as treatment for chronic post-LMI dizziness. METHODS: We first applied cerebellar rTMS in healthy volunteers (n = 11) and showed that cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) affected vestibulocerebellar neural activity. Then, between September and December 2015, we enrolled six patients (aged≥20 years) with chronic post-LMI dizziness (duration≥6 months), applied cerebellar rTMS (iTBS for 5 days), and followed these patients up for up to 25 months for clinical symptoms (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI]), signs (nystagmus), and VOR gain. RESULTS: Four of the six patients completed the study without complications. After rTMS, DHI scores were reduced (mean pre-rTMS DHI score minus post-rTMS DHI score was 13.0 [P = 0.036]) with disappearance of the ipsilesional nystagmus characteristic of the post-LMI dizziness. Reduction in the absolute VOR gain (mean pre- rTMS gain minus post-rTMS gain in the ipsilesional direction was 0.135 [P = 0.036] and that in the contralesional direction was 0.137 [P = 0.031]) were also associated with reduced DHI scores. Relative cerebellar blood flow to the brainstem was increased in four of five patients. The effects of cerebellar rTMS did not always persist, and three of four patients elected to undergo more than one rTMS series. The repeat cerebellar rTMS treatments had same beneficial effects. CONCLUSION: Our study showed, for the first time, the potential efficacy of cerebellar rTMS for treatment of chronic post-LMI dizziness. The short duration of the cerebellar rTMS effects can be compensated for by repeating the rTMS treatment every few months. Further large-scale randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lateral medullary infarction (LMI) sometimes causes long-lasting dizziness. Although the precise mechanism of chronic post-LMI dizziness is unknown, a cerebellar control disorder of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) has been reported in such patients. We conducted a proof-of-principle cohort study to assess the potential efficacy of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as treatment for chronic post-LMI dizziness. METHODS: We first applied cerebellar rTMS in healthy volunteers (n = 11) and showed that cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) affected vestibulocerebellar neural activity. Then, between September and December 2015, we enrolled six patients (aged≥20 years) with chronic post-LMI dizziness (duration≥6 months), applied cerebellar rTMS (iTBS for 5 days), and followed these patients up for up to 25 months for clinical symptoms (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI]), signs (nystagmus), and VOR gain. RESULTS: Four of the six patients completed the study without complications. After rTMS, DHI scores were reduced (mean pre-rTMS DHI score minus post-rTMS DHI score was 13.0 [P = 0.036]) with disappearance of the ipsilesional nystagmus characteristic of the post-LMI dizziness. Reduction in the absolute VOR gain (mean pre- rTMS gain minus post-rTMS gain in the ipsilesional direction was 0.135 [P = 0.036] and that in the contralesional direction was 0.137 [P = 0.031]) were also associated with reduced DHI scores. Relative cerebellar blood flow to the brainstem was increased in four of five patients. The effects of cerebellar rTMS did not always persist, and three of four patients elected to undergo more than one rTMS series. The repeat cerebellar rTMS treatments had same beneficial effects. CONCLUSION: Our study showed, for the first time, the potential efficacy of cerebellar rTMS for treatment of chronic post-LMI dizziness. The short duration of the cerebellar rTMS effects can be compensated for by repeating the rTMS treatment every few months. Further large-scale randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.