| Literature DB >> 30096917 |
Feng Li1, Xiaosong Jiang2, Zhenyi Shao3, Degui Zhu4, Zhiping Luo5.
Abstract
Titanium alloy/Entities:
Keywords: Ti/HA; biocompatibility; interface characteristic; mechanical properties; strengthening mechanism
Year: 2018 PMID: 30096917 PMCID: PMC6120013 DOI: 10.3390/ma11081391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Comparison of the mechanical properties of Titanium and Titanium/HA biomaterials.
| Process | Materials | Young’s Modulus | Vicker Hardness | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | cp-Ti | 100 GPa | - | [ |
| Hot-pressing | Ti-20% HA | 102.6 GPa | 3.41 GPa | [ |
| Hot-pressing | HA-20% Ti | 75.91 GPa | 3.13 GPa | [ |
| Hot-pressing | cp-Ti | - | 217 ± 1.19 | [ |
| Hot-pressing | Ti-30% nHA | - | 383.8 ± 1.13 | [ |
| Plasma-sprayed coatings | HA/Ti | 57.4 ± 5.3 GPa | 3.9 ± 0.4 GPa | [ |
Figure 1Morphology and schematic view of PEO method [15].
Figure 2(a) TEM image showing dislocations within Titanium phase; (b) HRTEM image showing clean MLG-Ti interface (inset the selected area diffraction patterns of Titanium) of 0.5 wt. % MLG/Ti composite [34].
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the PEO coating to form the oxide film by plasmabubble implosion: (i) Plasma bubbles take place on surface; (ii) Micro-arcs, whichare generated through the narrow discharge channels, lead to the implosion; and (iii) This implosion makes micro-pores in the oxide film [61].
Figure 4Backscattered SEM images and EDS analysis of HA-Ti-33 wt. % Fe composites sintered in vacuum at 1000 °C; (a) image of HA/5% (Ti-33 wt. % Fe); (b) high-magnification image; (c) EDS line scan across a typical Ti-Fe particle and (d) image of HA/15% (Ti-33 wt. % Fe) [63].
Figure 5Schematic cross-sectional illustration of the modification of the outermost surfaces of Titanium specimens as a function of pretreatment time in the hydrothermal liquid [64].
Scheme 1Reaction of MWCNTs with TiO2 NFs (nanofibers) [36].
Figure 6Schematic view of bonding Hydroxyapatite on the Titanium surface [16].
Figure 7Schematic diagram of the microstructure evolution of SLM-processed Ti-nHA composites with different nHA addition [4].
Figure 8Restrained HA grain growth by GN(graphene nanosheet) and abnormal growth of the grain along the direction parallel to GN; (a) TEM image of the HA-GN composites showing that GN is predominantly located at the HA grain boundaries, forming a serial wall zones isolating individual HA grains, and abnormal HA grain growth is seen along the direction parallel to GN; and (b) schematic depiction of the composites illustrating evolvement of the HA grains during the SPS processing and following heat treatment [54].
Figure 9(a) Variation in fracture toughness and (b) work of fracture with wt. % Ti in HA. Data in (a) and (b) have been represented as mean ± standard error. Dunnett’s t-test (two-sided) was used to compare the HA with HA-Ti samples (marked with *), while Dunnett’s C-test was used to find the most significant difference among all samples (marked with #). Statistical analysis shows the most significant difference at 0.05 level for n = 5 [31].
Figure 10Representative secondary electron SEM micrographs of chemically etched HA (a), showing the indent (500 g load) region and crack path (marked with a white arrow); (b,c) represent the backscattered electron SEM images of HA-10 Ti, showing the indent (at 1000 g load) region and crack path. The crack bridging (marked on (b,c)) by lath-shaped/elongated Ti particles and crack wake debonding (marked on (c)) are visible. The crack wake debonding at the HA/Ti interface with spherical and lath-shaped particles is clearly visible and marked with white arrow on (d,e), respectively [31].
Figure 11Schematic illustration of the local current distribution and the neck growth between particles of Ti-HA biocomposites. The yellow arrows indicate the effect of mechanism I (Spark plasma discharge mechanism), and the red arrows indicate the effect of mechanism II (Heat-transfer mechanism). (a) Since the electrical conductivity of HA was much lower than Ti, the current preferentially flowed to Ti particles and the die body; (b) High temperature plasma (spark plasma) generated in the gaps between Ti powder particles through Mechanism I, contributing to vaporization and themelting of the particle-contacting zones. Then, lots of joule heating of HA particles got from the surrounding Ti particles and die form through Mechanism II [30].
Figure 12Fracture surface of the tensile samples (a,b) overview and magnification image of Ti-2%HA sample [4].
Figure 13Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of bone-like apatite layer on the surface of porous NiTi-HA composites [6].